Oracle PeopleSoft HCM Pricing

organization. In my opinion, the generic help from Oracle is of little to no value for most organizations. Be prepared to hire people to support you - or, at

components, and recruiting tools. It has a lot of capabilities that deliver value to our teams at an individual level as well as from a management standpoint … The UI is a little antiquated Somewhat expensive leveraging the app Security concerns with recent vulnerabilities…

smaller companies due to the infrastructure requirements. Also, it has larger cost to maintain the software when accounting for patches, PUM, updates, etc.

on what benefits us from the cloud improvements...not drilling us on the price or nickel and diming.

the 'data field' vs. the common name of the group. This was cumbersome and cost time. This process could be made more efficient. When using the product to

for Android or iOS--only browser, which does not render very well. Quite expensive and implementation is challenging.

suitable for small and medium sized to even large sized companies and is very cost effective. Oracle is heavily invested into the success of this product to

all the colleges which help in conducting business easily and reduce the cost immensely in maintaining the employees.

Price Product Features Product Usability

met that need for more than 15 years. We were able to avoid purchasing expensive time clock hardware and associated software for the campus by making use … plus ongoing maintenance and replacements. PC HCM annual maintenance is expensive and increases every year. Most of the…

to set up queries and save them for other users. PeopleSoft HCM is very expensive and implementation is complex and challenging. PeopleSoft HCM is not very

appropriate for small organizations (less than 300 employees) because the cost of support is high.

enrollment and maintain student success. That in itself has been a great value.

faculty are able to spend money on personnel for grants they earn. We can't afford glitches where the grant gets overspent, or someone doesn't get paid on

regards to 9.2 over older versions, I would say this upgrade would be of value if a cloud move is 5+ years out. PS HCM is not a system that I hear is often

comprehensive and best suited for a 1000+ employee organization both due to cost and services. While there have been hiccups over the years of utilizing PeopleSoft … impressive. With such emphasis on less paper trail, this has certainly been a cost-effective means to make information available electronically. … comprehensive and best suited for a 1000+ employee organizati…

reduces the HR Data maintenance and security cost when it was handled in other legacy environments. The training cost involved is quite minimal, as most of the … tool since it used by employees across organization, there should be minimum cost involved in training about the tool. Oracle Peoplesoft HCM is such a tool … explanatory in nature and easy to navigate and use, thus r…

Includes most required HCM and payroll business capabilities with good ratio cost versus functionality. Easy access to knowledge and availability of consultants

HCM falls down is with smaller organizations due to the higher licensing cost and more of a standard set of employment rules. … Expensive - PeopleSoft license fees are not trivial. High maintenance - due to…

information and raw data. It offers great archiving and recovery of information costing less in physical storage and printing and allowing universal access to necessary

position management.Not very well suited for smaller organizations due to the cost involved.

who work from the same location. Smaller businesses will likely find the cost structure and less than stellar mobility support less attractive. … help reduce the HR staff requirements, which reduces cost for the company even after the signficant cost of the software. If used properly Oracle PeopleSoft … who work from the same location. Smaller businesses will lik…

Payables Receivables Project Costing General Ledger Procurement Treasury / Cash Management Billing Asset

Cost comparison