Next-Generation Firewalls - PA SeriesPricing

multiple Appliances in remote sites maybe you'll have an issue with the price: it's not cheap.

High cost. Some of the features may not in use. Require to subscribe more features

[that] are easy to find and deploy. However, this device being on the expensive side makes it difficult to implement for small offices, which is, in my

few optional features of white listing a specific file by its name or hash value or some other detail. Compared to other vendors, this is costly, but again

CLI configuration is tough Cost is too high. TAC support response.

Heavy budget small level company can't afford. Only pro level security engineer can handle or work on it. To remember

Some organizations can't afford this firewall because this is very expensive but you will … Alto is really expensive firewall. Complicated command line. 9 … Easy to configure through GUI. Good technical support. Very expensive but you will get all the advanced security…

for the beginners Expensive as compare to other available solutions Less documentation available … Palo Alto firewall only affords by Large level infrastructure … is highly improved so we don't need to worry about attacks & data breach Cost is justified according to…

Hard to configure through CLI. Very expensive. … I don't thin[k] small organization can afford this. This is best for big budget organization

area that is not so useful is on a tight budget. Palo Alto firewall is not cheap and you will need to purchase two to have a redundant core.

well suited. It's security end to end in a box. The only challenge is cost. And if you size it appropriately for a medium business in a single location … you get peace of mind. That's a small price for a busine…

Expensive. Palo Alto offerings are usually more expensive than products of competing companies (Cisco ASA, FortiGate, SonicWall, … subscription packages are needed, and licensing can be confusing and/or expensive. … series of devices by Fo…

Price License … Great product if you can afford it. PA … PA firewall provide best in class NextGen protection Price are too high - depends on what subscription you deployed

Cloud features Value Support … Virtual platform has allowed for great hardware cost decrease Multi tenancy options have been great

the extra cost. … PA was cheaper than the

Cost, these firewalls are awesome, but not cheap.

devices are not rugged and are not well suited for industrial environments. The cost of products is higher than other vendors, but you are also getting a lot … Units are far more expensive than competitors. It's worth it, but the price point can scare potential clients off. … devices are not rugged and are not well suited for i…

deployment. Their cost is sometimes prohibitive making other technologies better suited for those concerned about cost - but the cost is worth the technology

Great up-time and reliability. May cost a little more but is worth it. Between our PA firewalls and our Juniper switching

The endpoint protection price is not competitive The Ldap integration and user mapping could be more intuitive

live with. Netgear is very limited and cheaply made. Checkpoint, while having a large feature set is VERY expensive. … products, Netgear business class, Checkpoint and none of these come to the cost/performance/ease of management/feature set/support of the PA NGFW's. We'

of service long-term, so we were able to work with Palo Alto to design a price point program based on a 5 year Lifecycle! We are very pleased with their

devices are not cheap, and can be especially expensive with all of the licenses added on. … Overall, even though the device is very expensive (both hardware

very advanced models (more expensive) do this. It might bring smaller customers in by adding more advanced features to lower-priced models. … measured in the first few attacks you prevent. IT leaders rarely include the cost of clean-up and preventative scanning of computers…

These are cheaper (or at least were) than the Meraki firewalls and they allow you to integrate