Pantheon Pricing

“Expensive, but it's worth what you pay.”

“Subscription seems to be a bit uneconomical.Budget is a concern after implementing Pantheon.”

“We have the opportunity to create and run websites on an affordable budget that does not affect our company growth.”

“As a freelancer, I feel it's too expensive to do this alone with a smaller budget.”

“When you compare the cost of the product to the value it provides and time to launch - Pantheon wins the race. … By integrating tools like Redis, Solr, NewRelic reporting, and now free HTTPS using Let's Encrypt and their global CDN - it's a tool worth it's weight for clients whose core business is built around...”

“It has saved us having to hire/pay a full time dev ops engineer The use of the free instance spinning up helps save costs on deploying test sites We can pay a fee based on expected traffic for each...”

“A custom webapp would be better suited but might be more expensive.”

“Pantheon has stable and powerful features and they offer a free trial for initial functionalities testing the data management and integration with multiple data sources is fantastic.”

“Ever since Pantheon changed its pricing structure to calculate based on monthly users than say daily users, it is no longer cost-effective for sites that rely on organic search traffic for their... … Expensive for those who are not consistently developing on the platform, there are other options out there at better price points.”

“Pantheon helps World Literature Today deliver online content to the magazine's online readers and hosts the full digital edition of the magazine that offers a monthly or annual subscription. … The recent increases in monthly costs with Pantheon [have] taken a large chunk out of their ROI, however.”

“The price point that Pantheon offers may be prohibitive to some clients that are used to cheaper hosting.”