Proofpoint Email ProtectionPricing

thus saving us time (and money). It is hard to measure specific cost/ROI but perceived value is substantial. … The cost associated with some threats (such as successful fraudulent wire transfers)

365 ATP for a year before switching to Proofpoint. The product is more expensive but it does a much better job than ATP in filtering the emails. Quarantine … for users to get used to Quarantine Digest - releasing, blocking senders Expensive compared to Office 365

the on-premises service and do not know anything about the cloud offering. Cost is high with some of the options.

The pricing is high and there are many licenses for things I feel should be part of

you really can't put a price on the value of keeping spam away from the desktop and out of people's Inbox! With

We used Barracuda at one point but the price was going up and the performance and features went down or went away all

There are several examples of imposter email campaigns that nearly cost us thousands of dollars before we implemented Proofpoint's imposter email

Protected critical business information. Expensive for what it is (need to pay for extra functionality). Helped with user

and Trend Micro Email Security. We selected Trend's product due to the price, but it failed miserably at clustering and overall email delivery. Proofpoint … second as it checked off a lot of the boxes that we required in our RFP. The price was significantly higher. Personally,…

small organization, I don't think they require any complex filtering and cost is a big factor.

supportable core system. The cost alignment on the 'bells and whistles' we haven't purchased licenses for, moves this into a less affordable range per seat cost

did not make it through to the intended person that could have potentially cost the organization a lot of money.

Features such as TAP and others are separate packages from a price point (not bundled). Email quarantines are not always 100% accurate. Some … Proofpoint cloud protection without the on-premise hardware is a no-brainer! The cost per user is relatively low given the potential high negative impact if business … evaluated a competitor (Mimecast) a few…

through logs that have a short word-wrap threshold like that is painful. The cost of Proofpoint is higher than any other product I've piloted.

who call to report spam and malicious messages. It has reduced the material cost of machines being infected with malware. It has reduced the financial impact

organization's network infrastructure. The tools like TAP, TRAP are great value adds for the product. There are some issues that the Proofpoint support or

The cost is significantly higher than other similar products on the market. The administrative

selected Proofpoint based on a number of factors, including online reviews, pricing, maturity of solution, depth of features, as well as the significantly better

the protection could be better. Though Proofpoint Email Protection is not cheap, it does the job so much better. Though the basic core functionality is just

amount of message traffic as you would in a large business to justify the cost. However for med/large business it's a no brainer as it's helped a lot.

suite meets many enterprise needs. The challenge is the over all-suite cost/pricing and comparisons with competitors like Microsoft O365. … Feature-wise, identical. Mimecast was very affordable compared to Proofpoint. We were able to get annual costs with Proofpoint … (d…

filter spam. We aren’t using it for much more really and aren’t getting much value beyond that. … It costs us a lot of money for a medium amount of value. We probably won’t be renewing once we move to O365 as we have a terrible

attack or malware linked email to justify the purchase of Proofpoint. Instant Value creator!

Certainly a value for money. Lot of features to take advantages of like malware, spam and bulk