TrustRadius: an HG Insights company
Survicate Logo

Survicate Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 8.7 out of 10
Score
8.7 out of 10

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for Survicate are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Pros

User-Friendly Interface: Many users have praised Survicate for its incredibly user-friendly interface, with some describing it as intuitive and easy to navigate. The majority of reviewers found the design to be clean and not overwhelming, making it simple for both basic and advanced users to create, customize, and analyze surveys.

Helpful Customer Support: The customer support provided by Survicate has received high praise from users. They appreciate the customer-oriented approach and the ability to consistently communicate with the same support representative. Reviewers describe the support team as helpful, pleasant, informative, responsive, knowledgeable, and willing to take feature requests.

Versatile Survey Creation: Users value the diversity of survey forms and ease of use provided by Survicate. Many reviewers find it useful not only for gathering feedback from customers but also for improving internal processes and gathering ideas from their teams. They particularly enjoy the balance between pre-built templates and customization options available in Survicate's survey builder.

Reviews

6 Reviews

Survicate review

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Survicate to understand needs and pains of users', who go through our funnel and how they perform depending on the answers in the app by integrating analytical tools.

Pros

  • Clear and simple integration process
  • It's a great tool in terms of speed of hypothesis validation. You can set up a survey and get responses for one hour. The only limit is your traffic.
  • Almost immediate support response
  • Easy to use. You have opportunity to set-up your audience and survey placement in various ways

Cons

  • Minor usability issues on the step of audience setting (no drop-down menu for attribute values )
  • There is no option to make "other" answer required

Likelihood to Recommend

When you need to validate your hypothesis fast on specific app placements and to show questions to a particular audience

Vetted Review
Survicate
1 year of experience

Great UX and robust functionalities

Rating: 9 out of 10

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Survicate for Customer satisfaction (CSAT), Net Promoter Score (NPS) and other Surveys - whenever we need to deepen our understanding of our clients needs.

Pros

  • Easy to set-up
  • Seemless integration with MailChimp
  • Nice reporting

Cons

  • Working well for what we need

Likelihood to Recommend

Sruveys with more complex flows/logis - especially when you want to link results back to specific users to be able to do more-in-depth analysis of results

Comprehensive tool to create and embed surveys

Rating: 8 out of 10

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Survicate provides the NPS survey within our landing page builder app. The process of creating the survey is super easy and intuitive; it allows us to create different scenarios and paths depending on different survey answers. It's also extremely helpful that Survicate integrates with systems we are using within the organization such as Hubspot and it works well. Lastly my words of appreciation to the support team, always positive, brilliant, and responding really fast to any queries.

Pros

  • Intuitive survey builder
  • Many integrations
  • Fast and effective support
  • Easy embed options

Cons

  • Not all embed options goes in line with survey features (like excluding certain emails while using _sva.showSurvey('tosurveyId') embed option.

Likelihood to Recommend

If you wish to create a survey and embed it in your app or email communication - Survicate is for you.

Best in-app survey tool, integrated with all top MarTech tools

Rating: 10 out of 10

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We are using Survicate for in-app surveys targeting specific segments of customers to gather product feedback and measure NPS on a quarterly basis. We are also using link surveys and email-embedded surveys that help us to understand churn reasons, understand user acquisition channels better, as well as to improve our product features. We are using website surveys also on specific marketing websites and blog, where we are targeting engaged visitors and are able to help them navigate better through the pages.

Pros

  • Integrations
  • User targeting
  • Great UI & UX
  • Dedicated onboarding, and support
  • Automated analysis of open text responses
  • Survey distribution methods: web, mobile, email & link

Cons

  • More complex questions types

Likelihood to Recommend

Here's what worked especially well for us:

- Collecting in-product feedback with targeted surveys. It allowed us to better understand perception of features we were launching with the product team. One-time, quick installation (for all surveys), was especially useful for us, as we didn't have to involve the Development Team in launching our surveys.

- Running targeted website surveys to better understand audience, improve messaging, and content. We used Survicate on our feature pages, blog posts, etc. It allowed us to better understand what visitors are looking for on our pages, adjust the way we do messaging.

For both use-cases the recently introduced feature that automatically groups open-text responses into relevant topics was a game changer for us. It reduced significantly the amount of manual work to analyze collected data.

Functional, but very basic

Rating: 4 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Survicate to collect in-app NPS and cSAT scores from end users throughout their journeys.

Pros

  • Limiting survey visibility via feature flags
  • In-app/intercept surveying
  • Real-time NPS and cSAT scoring

Cons

  • In my opinion, inconsistent and visually unappealing survey visuals (e.g., NPS and cSAT questions look completely different from each other, creating a disjointed visual experience)
  • Poor customer service (in my experience, issue resolution can take weeks)
  • Lack of clarity around API & other technical capabilities requiring engineering assistance
  • Very limited maximum response limit per month

Likelihood to Recommend

Survicate is well suited for very basic intercept polls and is less suited for more complex surveying tasks (e.g., anything more than basic skip-logic or surveying niche cohorts) and longitudinal surveying (e.g., comparing responses from the same or similar cohorts year over year).

Simple and easy, great for simple needs.

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use this widget on our knowledge base site, where documentation and support articles reside. The widget is the main channel for customers to submit feedback, comments and questions regarding the content of our knowledge base. The comments are then assigned for review and any action that might be needed, to different teams in the company, depending on the page (subject) where the feedback was submitted.

Pros

  • IMO, the strengths of feedback lite is what it is called for - 'lite"... it is basic, simple, and easy to set up and use.
  • Especially should be mention that it is easy to set up, and you can have it working in less than a few hours.
  • Reliable - I don't remember even one "problem" or an issue we experienced with it.

Cons

  • So the other side of the simplicity, is the lack of options... options of feedback forms, design, and reporting. It should be said that all the mentioned (feedback forms, customization of the design etc.) ARE available, but you maybe feeling their limitation, at some point.
  • Especially what we are missing, is better integration with CRM or at least, common ticketing systems. Feedback Lite IS NOT a ticketing system nor task management system , so integration with such (Salesforce, in our case) would be great. At the moment we are using the CSV export, and manually loading the file to SF.
  • We had a case of feedback mistakenly deleted - before copied to other system - and by that, they got lost. we asked support for help, and their final answer was that it is impossible to restore the deleted answers. so we were idiots, but it turned that the tool isn't idiot friendly, at that point.

Likelihood to Recommend

<u>Scenarios where Feedback Lite is well suited: </u>

<ul><li>when one needs to set up a tool rapidly, without going into too much customization, configuration and such. </li><li>if you don't need to much processing and analyzing of the data, but only a basic level. </li></ul><u>Scenarios where it is less appropriate:

</u><ul><li>where feedback collected requires individual followup (e.g. you collect free text feedback, which are actually questions, complaints and such).</li></ul><u>

</u>

Vetted Review
Survicate
2 years of experience