TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM Targetprocess

Score8.5 out of 10

87 Reviews and Ratings

What is IBM Targetprocess?

IBM Targetprocess is a Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) SaaS that connects strategy, funding, and execution. It helps enterprises prioritize work, dynamically allocate resources, and continuously adapt plans. With real-time visibility and financial insights, organizations can deliver faster, clearer business outcomes.

Read more details.

Media

Screenshot of Resource Management: Reduces risk by dynamically managing resources, capacity, and demand
Screenshot of Program Management: To deliver value throughout a strategic portfolio
Screenshot of Portfolio Budgeting: Shifting from project to product funding
Screenshot of Strategic Planning: Continuously links work, labor, and investments to business strategy
Screenshot of Workforce Management
Screenshot of Work
Screenshot of Corporate Goals
Screenshot of SPM Priorities
Screenshot of SPMCC Finance
Screenshot of SPMCC Funding Request
Screenshot of SPM CC Home

1 / 11

Screenshot of Resource Management: Reduces risk by dynamically managing resources, capacity, and demand

Top Performing Features

  • Support for Agile Methodology

    Agile is a time boxed, iterative approach to development that builds software incrementally instead of trying to deliver it all at once near the end.

    Category average: 8.3

  • Timesheet Tracking

    Timesheet tracking is the ability to track all billable and non-billable hours for each project.

    Category average: 7.7

  • Resource Management

    Resource management is workload planning to maximize resources.

    Category average: 8.3

Areas for Improvement

  • Support for Waterfall Methodology

    Waterfall methodology is a tradition development method that is linear and sequential.

    Category average: 5.5

  • Search

    Users can search for related materials across files, discussions threads, schedules, etc. using project keywords or tags.

    Category average: 6

  • Velocity Calculation

    Product uses historical data to calculate team velocity and help understand how much time future work will take.

    Category average: 5.9

Who Buys & Uses IBM Targetprocess

Pros

  • Extensive customization options to align with organizational needs
  • Robust dashboards and reporting with clean, useful visualizations
  • Seamless integration capabilities with other SaaS solutions like Jira and Apptio

Cons

  • Complex and difficult User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX)
  • Performance issues, particularly with large datasets causing lags
  • Challenges with flexible role-based access control (RBAC) customization

Optimizing Workflows and Visibility Using IBM Targetprocess

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We widely use IBM Targetprocess tool for PI planning before starting the next quarter, OKR's planning, Working assignment to the engineers and cross team collaboration. This will help us to prioritize the tasks, track the dependencies, sprint planning , backlog grooming and delivery tracking. this will reduce the time and improve the productivity

Pros

  • PI planning, On Every quarter the identified taks have been tracked with it
  • This works well for backlog grooming
  • This will help us to manage the cross team deliverables

Cons

  • The UI is bit complex for new users who never used it. i think this can be sorted out by providing the steps to access?
  • dashboards with large datasets can cause performance lags or timeouts
  • Introduce more flexible, template-based RBAC configurations.

Return on Investment

  • Faster PI planning and backlog grooming
  • Unified views across teams and portfolios
  • Improved capacity planning and forecasting

Alternatives Considered

IBM Cloudability

Other Software Used

Atlassian Jira, Trello, Corporate Planner

Amazing experience with IBM Targetprocess

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

IBM Targetprocess is something we are trying to implement to improve the agile process in our team to improve efficiency and productivity. The advantage of IBM Targetprocess is the visual boards and it helps us in visualizing details in a better manner and hence improve collaboration among the team. The other advantage is integration with other tools.

Pros

  • Integration with JIRA
  • Visual Boards
  • Integration with AI

Cons

  • Learning Curve was the biggest challenge

Usability

Return on Investment

  • It has improved productivity of our resources.
  • It has improved tracking for our resources.

Other Software Used

Atlassian Jira

Overall a good product as part of IBM Apptio suite

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use IBM Targetprocess across the organization for our Jira ticket managements and track the projects via different sprints using kanban dashboards, hierarchical lists, etc

Pros

  • Integration with other tooling
  • Agile scaling
  • We can create custom workflows

Cons

  • User On-boarding can be improved - as whenever we add a new user through Apptio administration - we need to assign separate permissions within IBM Targetprocess for the basic/read-only permissions as well. User only sees an error message that does not point out the issue why he/she is not able to sign in.
  • User sync from Apptio administration to IBM Targetprocess can be added. Example - If I am deleting the user itself from Apptio administration. It should delete the user along with permissions from IBM Targetprocess and the license should get freed immediately, rather we have to manually delete it inside IBM Targetprocess separately

Usability

Return on Investment

  • Improved Quarterly planning
  • Enhanced Project management
  • Simplified for Scrum Masters to collaborate with different teams

Alternatives Considered

Atlassian Jira and Planview AgilePlace

Other Software Used

Atlassian Jira

Operational transformation and ROI with IBM target process.

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use IBM Targetprocess for high-level strategic goals with everyday team execution across Software development units. Planning failed because demand constantly exceeded the actual workforce capacity, leading to burnout and delayed deliverables.

Pros

  • Visualization and Dynamic boards.
  • Domain customization.
  • Capacity and Demand planning.

Cons

  • Overwhelming initial setup.
  • Advanced Reporting limitations.

Usability

Return on Investment

  • 40% decrease in planning time.
  • 15% cross team efficiency.

A review as a relatively new adopter of IBM Targetprocess

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We've recently adopted IBM Targetprocess as our Enterprise Portfolio Management solution to help us with our view of strategy to execution. As an Organisation we recently moved away from one tooling supplier so hopefully can provide some objectivity to this review. We were keen to give visibility and transparency of our Change portfolio to become more data driven and facilitate the right conversations.

Pros

  • The UI is more intuitive than other suppliers and that is consistent feedback from our user population
  • We've really focused in on and leveraged the power of the integrations with our other SaaS solutions to create that version of the truth and avoidance of unnecessary and wasteful duplication of effort.
  • Dashboards are useful and spinning up new reports is relatively straightforward with basic knowledge of the tooling.
  • Being able to share the view to non users within the Organisation is a useful benefit.
  • I like the ability to be able assess data points within many of the visuals to simply validate and interrogate the data.

Cons

  • Having the ability to only open 3 windows at a time is an unnecessary constraint and hope IBM will get this on the change road map.
  • Excited to see what AI capabilities will be developed over time to create further Portfolio management efficiencies.
  • We're currently navigating support options which appear to differ by Apptio product so maybe room to create some consistency there as it's a little confusing.
  • If you use an implementation partner be sure to focus on knowledge transfer. It was important to us to be in control of the keys however you may have to drive this.

Return on Investment

  • Reduced waste via maximising integrations
  • Allowed us to move away from manual RAIDD management and tracking
  • Enabled greater visibility to portfolio change management
  • Enabled us to become more data driven
  • Transparency of change data so we can regularly inspect and adapt
  • Reduced cost in comparison to previous supplier.