Thomson Reuters Westlaw is unrivaled.
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
I rely on Thomson Reuters Westlaw for the vast majority of my legal research needs. The Thomson Reuters Westlaw product helps me identify cases and secondary sources in preparation for litigation, while drafting briefs, and in developing oral argument strategy. While I mostly rely on the tradition search features, I've enjoyed the Quick Cite feature to quickly pull cited authorities and like playing around with new tech innovations that Thomson Reuters Westlaw offers.
Pros
- User interface
- Chat support
- Plain language searches
Cons
- The AI search function is good for identify some key cases that address a given topic, but is not always on point or precise in analyzing case outcomes.
- More pre-programmed questions (e.g., What is the rule under Nebraska law for X) rather than having search for key words would improve efficiency.
- Not logging me out when I have a bunch of tabs open but have gone ideal.
Likelihood to Recommend
I rely almost exclusively on Thomson Reuters Westlaw for my legal research needs. I can find cases faster, use citing references, and examine authorities most efficiently on Thomson Reuters Westlaw. My colleagues all use Thomson Reuters Westlaw as well because it is the best legal research tool that we have available. In my opinion, there is no true rival.
