Overall Satisfaction with Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
We are using Amazon RDS at our company as a primary database service for one of our major product lines. Using RDS proved to be easy and straightforward both to deploy and to manage. Deployment of new RDS services is simple and requires no special knowledge, but you should plan ahead with proper capacity planning. The built-in optimization features allowed us to quickly identify slow and expensive queries so we could optimize them and improve overall system performance while reducing system size. Having integrated backup solutions in RDS was also very useful and being able to run multiple databases on the same RDS server, allowed us to optimize for cost as well. All in all, I recommend using RDS both for development and production workloads.
- Managed MySQL Server
- Automated Backups
- Simple Vertical Scaling
- Downsizing storage size is a complex process
- Horizontal scaling is complex
- Lowered maintenance effort
- Servers elasticity
- Increased security
- MySQL and MongoDB Atlas
Running MySQL RDS was a simpler solution than running standalone MySQL servers as the semi-managed nature of RDS saved us the need to install, maintain, secure, and backup our database servers.
Using MySQL RDS was in addition to running MongoDB Atlas workloads and allowed us to use both relational and non-relational databases as needed.
Using MySQL RDS was in addition to running MongoDB Atlas workloads and allowed us to use both relational and non-relational databases as needed.
Do you think Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)'s feature set?
Yes
Did Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) again?
Yes