NoSQL and Cloudant are a great match, specially for starters.
Updated April 07, 2020

NoSQL and Cloudant are a great match, specially for starters.

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with IBM Cloudant

I'm using Cloudant as a persistent backend to a web app that leverages PouchDB. It is easy to query and seamlessly synchronizes the app data to the cloud.

Pros

  • Easy to configure and operate through the GUI.
  • Seamless replication to CouchDB (like PouchDB).
  • The multi-tentant option is free for low utilization (HTTP requests and storage).

Cons

  • Instant database compaction on multi-tenant.
Easier to use, install and configure.
Cloudant is easy to use and has a high adherence to CouchDB-like databases, which is awesome for those moving into the NoSQL space.

IBM Cloud Support and Implementation

Nice interface, easy to use, easy to interact through API.

IBM Cloudant Reliability

It was built to be scalable, so it couldn't get any better on this.

Comments

More Reviews of IBM Cloudant