Load Balancing Survey
February 28, 2025

Load Balancing Survey

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with F5 BIG-IP

LTM, GTM, ASM, APM. Application delivery and visibility.

Pros

  • Ease of configuration management.
  • GUI and CLI options as well as multiple automation options.
  • Software upgrade and roll backs.

Cons

  • Management plane saturation.
  • Config bloat causes slowness.
  • Visibility into historical data.
  • Deployed thousands of load balanced apps.
  • Multiple features like DNS, WAF, and of in-line traffic load balancing necessary for any productions applications.
  • We've been running multiple F5 BIG-IP devices for years and they are a foundational part of our network infrastructure.
Great, but room for improvement. My complaints are mostly around management plane and visibility. I look forward to new products which address these concerns. Otherwise, F5 BIG-IP offering is best in class load balancing.

Do you think F5 BIG-IP delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with F5 BIG-IP's feature set?

Yes

Did F5 BIG-IP live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of F5 BIG-IP go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy F5 BIG-IP again?

Yes

Application delivery for critical business applications. Even when deployed with a single server, it provides a hook for GTM/DNS and a platform for WAF and there protections.

F5 BIG-IP Feature Ratings

Comments

More Reviews of F5 BIG-IP