Google BigQuery Scalable Cost-Effective Analytics with Room for Governance Multi-Cloud Growth.
October 12, 2025
Google BigQuery Scalable Cost-Effective Analytics with Room for Governance Multi-Cloud Growth.

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Google BigQuery
We have activated the BigQuery export in GA360, and our data flows from GA360 into BigQuery. A Python script has been created to clean the data and store it in a new table within BigQuery. Power BI is connected to BigQuery, where a dashboard has been built. The dashboard updates automatically on a daily basis.
Pros
- Handling Huge Dataset.
- Seamless integration with GA.
- Cost effective.
- Machine Learning with BigQuery ML.
Cons
- BigQuery limits the number of concurrent queries per project and sometimes enforces quotas.
- The BigQuery UI (console) is functional but not as user-friendly as tools like Snowflake.
- While BQML is great for SQL-friendly ML, it doesn’t cover advanced deep learning.
- No infrastructure to manage, pay only for storage and queries.
- Analysts can run queries on billions of rows instantly without waiting for IT to provision resources.
- Business users get insights through dashboards (Looker Studio, Power BI) connected to BigQuery.
Fully serverless. We don’t manage clusters or warehouses. Requires us to manage virtual warehouses. BigQuery is cheaper for exploratory heavy queries; Snowflake is more predictable for sustained workloads. BigQuery is unbeatable if you’re deep in Google’s ecosystem; Snowflake is better for hybrid/multi-cloud. BigQuery gives you ML “for free” inside SQL.
Do you think Google BigQuery delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Google BigQuery's feature set?
Yes
Did Google BigQuery live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Google BigQuery go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Google BigQuery again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation