Basic HPQC review focussed on test documentation/report capabilities
December 15, 2015

Basic HPQC review focussed on test documentation/report capabilities

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Quality Center (formerly HP Quality Center)

HP Quality Center was used to document test cases, track what versions of SW/HW test cases were run on, and to create test reports for both internal and external entities.
  • Easily create database for test cases.
  • Easily breaks down large tests into steps for better documentation and to easily reproduce tests from team member to team member.
  • Look/feel of tool was old - not sure what version was used in company, however, it had what seemed to be older Windows 98 type panels, icons, etc.
  • Test reports difficult to create.
  • Difficult to sort database by tester, owner, etc., - would be beneficial for scheduling/planning purposes.
  • Positive: central place to document well thought out test plans/suites.
  • Negative: Difficulty in planning/customizing test strategy to particular FW/HW combination.
HP Quality Center has an older interface compared to the JIRA system. Bugzilla system seems to have similar older interface as HP Quality Center.
HP Quality Center is well suited for documentation. It is less appropriate for test reports and planning test strategy for some products/releases.

Micro Focus ALM / Quality Center Feature Ratings