Planning Analytics Design Future Proof
Overall Satisfaction with IBM Planning Analytics
From the use of this platform, it is evident that this has changed the way product design strategy is approached. Its workspace enables the optimization of the models with respect to desired design parameters and key performance indicators. It employs historical data along with forecasts, making the design decision sensitive.
Pros
- It stands out by the multidimensional model, where one can perform modeling across several dimensions to get a holistic look into the impact.
- Its planning analytics engine is based on analyzing the tendencies for client usage.
- Integration of dynamic workflows makes it possible for various teams to work together immediately in efforts to decide on the strategies that have to be implemented.
Cons
- Spending much time and effort to set the right dimensions and structures.
- Despite the inclusion of many features, the interface provides too much information to the user.
- Some components of the visualization can be not customized enough, and in some cases, they must be exported to other tools in order to be presented.
- The application of this platform has served to achieve several business goals.
- The system has been able to analyze and ensure that it has met the requirements of users during the period before the point of conversion.
- Business development has improved by means of comprehensive and focused features of a product.
These are its ability to model certain scenarios and given designs across the different users and the different seasons. The alternative analysis tools allow modeling changes to be made in order to foresee the effect of such changes. Dynamic dimension modeling tracks evolving user preferences. Learning how to use the software has been useful, in particular in the aspect of being able to develop sandboxed scenarios for testing new designs.
The availability of this platform has made it possible to have capabilities that could not be done by the former tools. Today, forecasting the needs in designs depending on the season takes only several hours. By applying design decisions in fashion designing, the amount of return on investment can be estimated with less variability.
Other options, namely Anaplan, Oracle ePm Cloud, and SAP Analytics Cloud, were also considered. Anaplan's interface lacked analytical depth. For product design metrics, flexibility was not as good in Oracle ePm Cloud. The final choice was moved by the fact that it was driven by analysis of business needs through multidimensional modelling of the platform.
Do you think IBM Planning Analytics delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with IBM Planning Analytics's feature set?
Yes
Did IBM Planning Analytics live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of IBM Planning Analytics go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy IBM Planning Analytics again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation