Collaborative Workflow Architecture
Overall Satisfaction with IBM Planning Analytics
The connection of operational metrics with financial metrics using the platform permits the creation of the highest visibility of network cost drivers. The organizational data structure is advantageous for comparing performance across different levels, from individual to the entire network. Though the initial setup required the cooperation of the finance and IT departments, the now efficient interfaces have made it possible for analysts to independently manage and update the models we need as we change.
Pros
- The platform's engine supports creating models with references numerous directions at once.
- Planning analytics allows continuous customization of preconceived concepts with immediate impacts based on the changing of the due date due to decisions during live planning sessions.
- The integrated additional workflow formalizes daily planning for all key workflow elements in terms of input from other divisions within the financial planning models.
Cons
- TM1 language is also quite different from Excel formula; therefore, it initially will take some time to adapt.
- While complex analytical functionalities are adequately supported, options for graphics conversion by base data are not quite as comprehensive as in other BI suites.
- The mobile version has even fewer features compared to the PC one, which is a problem when an executive has to analyze a complicated situation on the go.
- Better demand forecasting and pricing optimization have led to a net profit increase in spite of variable market circumstances.
- Now, the process of our annual budgeting requires less time, which allows us to focus on strategic analysis rather than data consolidation.
- Our use of aircraft much improved through the statistically determined fleet assignment; rates are down, and service levels are steady across the board on our routes, and the aircraft are cheaper.
The key points are the use of modeling for contingency planning around fuel prices and currency rates, hierarchical data structures helping facilitate various levels of analysis throughout the organization, and the contribution analysis capabilities offering insight into financial performance drivers across the network.
IBM Planning Analytics provides our company with the possibility to do integrated financial and operational planning, thus ensuring alignment between fleet strategies and financial projections. Instead of the static annual budgets, we now do incremental forecasts and update them every month, contributing to more flexible financial guidance. The most important thing is that we are now using planning models, which will automatically adjust the financials according to the operational metrics, smoothly reminding us of the change in market conditions.
It includes Oracle Cloud EPM Planning, Anaplan, and Adaptive Insight before deciding to choose IBM Planning Analytics. We selected Planning Analytics because of its work with complicated and many area models, the capability to work with big amounts of data, and compatibility with our IBM environment.
Do you think IBM Planning Analytics delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with IBM Planning Analytics's feature set?
Yes
Did IBM Planning Analytics live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of IBM Planning Analytics go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy IBM Planning Analytics again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation