Good traditional type Scheduler
September 24, 2024

Good traditional type Scheduler

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with JAMS

Systems automation like downloading files, moving them kicking off scripts that do other processing. End user automation like sending reports via emails, downloading files to file shares

Pros

  • Workload Processing
  • Error Alerts
  • Job Scheduling

Cons

  • Can not search for jobs or objects.
  • Cannot do version control of code
  • not easy to test changes. Need to make a code change, deploy, then submit job, then open monitor, then check job. if fails, come back to job definition and restart process. I think this is very cumbersome
  • Positive: JAMS helps us quickly automate manual tasks and so can reduce operational risks
  • This in turn saves costs when we have a large number of manual tasks that dont scale well.
  • From the negative perspective, JAMS is not lending itself naturally to a modern tech platform where newer tools like Airflow are gaining an edge.
It can be deployed to multiple servers via agents and still be monitored via a central console. However, doing this manual deployment and setup and maintenance is turning out to be a hassle for us. We would prefer a managed service without having to worry about this maintenance and management on our end.
In my opinion, they are the best in customer support. Simply using the help icon on the website connects to a live support personnel who will ensure you get your questions answers or problems solved. They dont ask for premium support packages - they simply want to help and have the customer solve their problems.
In my opinion, while JAMS is useful for point and click like developers, Astro is more useful for software developers, whole like to see "scheduling as code". in the long run, I think Astro might overtake JAMS in terms of usage and use cases that it satisfies across the tech and financial domains and with data developers.

Do you think JAMS delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with JAMS's feature set?

Yes

Did JAMS live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of JAMS go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy JAMS again?

No

Well suited: Easy to use with point and click based setup. Monitoring of jobs are easy
Less appropriate: In my experience, does not fit well into a modern toolset and technology stack

JAMS Feature Ratings

Multi-platform scheduling
9
Central monitoring
9
Logging
8
Alerts and notifications
6
Analysis and visualization
1
Application integration
6

Comments

  • Peter Hegland | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Hi - Thank you so much for leaving JAMS a review and being a customer. I am the Managing Director/General Manager for JAMS. I'd love to chat with you and learn more about how we stay relevant for data developers. My email is peter.hegland@fortra.com. Thanks again! Best, Peter Hegland

More Reviews of JAMS