Good traditional type Scheduler
September 24, 2024
Good traditional type Scheduler

Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with JAMS
Systems automation like downloading files, moving them kicking off scripts that do other processing. End user automation like sending reports via emails, downloading files to file shares
Pros
- Workload Processing
- Error Alerts
- Job Scheduling
Cons
- Can not search for jobs or objects.
- Cannot do version control of code
- not easy to test changes. Need to make a code change, deploy, then submit job, then open monitor, then check job. if fails, come back to job definition and restart process. I think this is very cumbersome
- Positive: JAMS helps us quickly automate manual tasks and so can reduce operational risks
- This in turn saves costs when we have a large number of manual tasks that dont scale well.
- From the negative perspective, JAMS is not lending itself naturally to a modern tech platform where newer tools like Airflow are gaining an edge.
In my opinion, while JAMS is useful for point and click like developers, Astro is more useful for software developers, whole like to see "scheduling as code". in the long run, I think Astro might overtake JAMS in terms of usage and use cases that it satisfies across the tech and financial domains and with data developers.
Do you think JAMS delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with JAMS's feature set?
Yes
Did JAMS live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of JAMS go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy JAMS again?
No

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation