Made QAs Life Easy
Overall Satisfaction with LambdaTest
We had execution environment issues for multi-environment on our Automation test framework that's where LT's Hyper-execute introduced to run regression on the different environments. As soon as our QA team commit the code, Hyper execute is automatically triggers and starts execution based on the Environment and Browsers and when the execution gets completed report is generated with result. It has the dashboard where quickly user can filter out the failed test and analyze for the fixes to be done
Pros
- Parallel Execution
- Reporting dashboard
- Huge Device support
- Platforms like Android, iOS versions
Cons
- Improve Support to resolve issues quickly
- ROI is around 65% when compared to the traditional automated execution in our org, drastically the time is saved due to parallel execution
One of the major reason was pricing, though it was decided by upper level management to get partnered with LambdaTest
Do you think LambdaTest delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with LambdaTest's feature set?
Yes
Did LambdaTest live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of LambdaTest go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy LambdaTest again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation