Lucidspark review
November 01, 2021

Lucidspark review

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Lucidspark

We use Lucidspark to structure async collaboration where solid templates and frameworks are required. Ramp-up is easy. And with the tools and templates, we can kick off collaboration as a group and then work independently. Changes are tracked and we can regroup at a later date to align and move forward.

Pros

  • Collaboration.
  • Sync and async work.
  • Tools and templates.

Cons

  • Integration w/ web conferencing tools.
  • Levels of security.
  • Different price points.
  • Reduced meeting time.
  • Increased meeting effectiveness.
  • Decreased documentation overhead.
Easy to dive in with samples, examples, and the tool boxes.
We do not use these features.
We have not had any issues with the accessibility or uptime of Lucidspark. Nor issues w/ "lag" or folks not seeing the same thing as we work together.
We have not used Lucidspark support.

Do you think Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite's feature set?

Yes

Did Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite again?

Yes

We liked the "Visio-like" interface and tools so that the diagrams were created as "smart" with respect to maintaining layout and relationships.
MURAL (formerly Mural.ly), Miro, Microsoft Visio
Lucidspark works well for process mapping, service mapping, activation plans, and current or future state maps.

Comments

More Reviews of Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite

  1. Home
  2. Visual Collaboration Software
  3. Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite Reviews
  4. User Review of Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite