M-files and a small laboratory company
Overall Satisfaction with M‑Files
We use M-files across the whole organization. We manage literally everything with it—quotes, purchases, orders, workflow, tasks, etc. We have also tailored it to work as a laboratory information management system in our laboratory, where we manage the samples, analysis data, and quality control.
Pros
- Document management
- Workflows
- Easy access and intuitive to use
Cons
- More features without coding (for example more options for automatic naming of documents, more functions when changing workflow state, etc.).
- Customizable front page (work example: different kind of page depending the user's task or department).
- Editing notification settings by admin (not only by user).
Do you think M‑Files delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with M‑Files's feature set?
Yes
Did M‑Files live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of M‑Files go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy M‑Files again?
Yes
- Work efficiency
- Easier quality control
- Better control of workflows
- Microsoft Office
Microsoft Office integration was easy.
M‑Files Feature Ratings
Using M‑Files
50 - Every person in our company uses M-files. From entry level trainee to CEO.
1 - People with good analytical and logical thinking skills. Comprehension of document management. Basic computers skills.
- Production / laboratory management
- Sales
- Human resources management
- Document management
- Laboratory management
- Equipment and chemical management
M‑Files Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Kept well informed No escalation required Support understands my problem | None |
Using M‑Files
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using | None |
- Document management
Yes - Mobile interface is not good. Very limited and inconsistent compared to desktop version.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation