Parasoft SOAtest Appraisal
November 02, 2015
Parasoft SOAtest Appraisal
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
Version 5 and up
Modules Used
- Web Services, Soap, Client, Browser Recording, Test Suite,
Overall Satisfaction with Parasoft SOAtest
I used Parasoft SOAtest at my previous company. Parasoft SOAtest was used in the information technology team. This tool assisted quality assurance engineers by minimizing the time and quantity of test cases used for manual testing. Parasoft SOAtest was for web services and browser recorded test cases. Quality engineers were able to organize their test cases in a test suite and execute them automatically.
Pros
- Organized test suites.
- Fast and efficient execution of automated testing.
- Built in Javascript that can be used to run test cases with a repository tool such as HP Quality Center. This will show the test results and allow the QA engineer to pass, fail, or set a test case to N/A.
Cons
- Enhance the performance of the browser recording.
- Make compatible with all repository tools. For example: Microsoft Team Foundation Server (TFS).
- Provide an option for a agile environment.
- Parasoft SOAtest has helped QA reduce their time of testing.
- Soap UI, Sahi Test Pro, Quick Test Pro and Selenium
Parasoft SOAtest does not freeze up like other tools. I have never had any issues with Parasoft SOAtest shutting down or any slow performance.
Parasoft SOAtest Feature Ratings
Using Parasoft SOAtest
Create and analyze samples.
QA engineers (manual and automation), system engineers, and software engineers (developers). The skills required are: analytical, familiarity of programming languages and code, and automation testing.
- Automation Testing
- The ability to have automation test cases linked to Microsoft TFS. And should show the execution status.
- Web Services functionaity
- N/A. We are currently not using the tool. However, I see areas in QA Testing that would be beneficial.
- N/A. We are currently not using the tool. However, I see areas in QA Testing that would be beneficial.
- N/A. We are currently not using the tool. However, I see areas in QA Testing that would be beneficial.
- N/A. We are currently and never have used the tool here. However, I have used it and I know ways that we could use it here.
- N/A. We are currently and never have used the tool here. However, I have used it and I know ways that we could use it here.
- N/A. We are currently and never have used the tool here. However, I have used it and I know ways that we could use it here.
Evaluating Parasoft SOAtest and Competitors
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Analyst Reports
My previous company was impressed with the functionality that was beneficial to QA Testing.
I would not change my evaluation. I continue to use Parasoft Soatest.
Parasoft SOAtest Implementation
- At my previous company, No.
Parasoft SOAtest Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Knowledgeable team Kept well informed Immediate help available Support cares about my success | Poor followup Problems left unsolved Escalation required Need to explain problems multiple times Slow Initial Response |
I had a question related to using the script with HP Quality Center. I was informed there was a script already built in Parasoft SOAtest that I could use to configure with HP Quality Center to show my automation test results.
Using Parasoft SOAtest
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Feel confident using | Unnecessarily complex Cumbersome Lots to learn |
- Web Services feature. And the Test Suites.
- Browser recording. However, after reading about it, I was able to use it better.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation