Overall Satisfaction with Pexels
With Pexels I found a simple and pure way to obtain images, videos, and backgrounds that I need to keep my articles well illustrated. It offers a better experience than many other similar platforms. I usually use it while I am writing articles and when I am about to finish the text I go to the site to obtain the images that are related to the main text.
- Media download
- Large database
- Search accuracy
- Improved detailed search
- Search for tiny objects or landscapes
- Including new AI capabilities
- Quick way to match results
- Image databank
- Image reference
- Positive: the writing material when well illustrated gain more engagement.
- Positive: images can inspire better descriptions of scenarios and landscapes and therefore can make long texts more attractive.
- Positive: we saved a lot of time when writing.
- Negative: some images do not have enough quality for printing purposes.
Pexels is more simple. The alternative options give no good search/selection experience. For example, you are limited to searching just one characteristic or the results are not always accurate. For example, your search for A and get B. Finally, I also note that the user does not always get the results listed in a way that makes easier the image choice.
Do you think Pexels delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Pexels's feature set?
Yes
Did Pexels live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Pexels go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Pexels again?
Yes