The Swiss Army Knife of Databases
Overall Satisfaction with RavenDB
RavenDB has been a central component of our application architecture for a long time. More we find it to be the appropriate database of use for numerous use cases and across industries. We believe it to be a well-rounded product that doesn't deliver features that it cannot deliver well, is very performant, and is friendly to projects small or big. Going forward we will do our best to promote it as the excellent software product that it is.
Pros
- Reduces the amount of code you need to achieve common tasks.
- Protects you against common traps.
- Provides features to develop mostly anything!
Cons
- Creating awareness around the developer community and establish a partner program.
- Projects where we worked with RavenDB went to market faster and cheaper because of the reduced cost of development.
- MongoDB, Apache CouchDB, Azure Cosmos DB, Amazon DocumentDB (with MongoDB compatibility), Neo4j and Microsoft SQL Server
Out of the many variants of document and SQL databases out there that we have used, RavenDB is our no 1 choice for anything but the smallest projects which can be served with a very small SQL instance. Other than that, RavenDB packs more features and is easier to work with than any of these.
Do you think RavenDB delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with RavenDB's feature set?
Yes
Did RavenDB live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of RavenDB go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy RavenDB again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation