Salesforce for Dummies - NOT! Huge tool with huge setup and maintenance costs, not for small organizations.
Overall Satisfaction with Salesforce.com
SF is used across the organization in two orgs I am a part of. It was to attempt to replace the ordering, registration, invoicing, and other forms of course booking and management.
- If you can spend a huge amount of money with consultants tailoring the workflow, it is a good product. Plan on 2-10x the purchase price.
- If properly and simply configured, it is a good CRM with hooks to many other systems. Again, every hook is time consuming and can be fragile.
- Very flexible - to an extreme. So you can program it to do what you need, with either very expensive in-house expertise or consultants.
- Having worked off and on in software development for decades, it is just too complex. That said, integrating point solutions is no joke either. SF tries to automate so many processes it reminds me of a 6 sigma project - 500,000 repetitions is a good mark, you will save loads of time and money. For a small team it is a tremendous time suck. Both the organizations I am familiar with here probably spent way more money that they could possibly have saved. That said, they did not have good guidance in implementation.
- From a database perspective, it is difficult to pull all information. Providing a link to simple tools would save having to deal with the complex reporting system.
- Negative in almost all cases, way too much effort for such small businesses. Bad decisions both.
- At some of my other clients, who implemented a regimented inflexible set of rules, it works well. They are much bigger or have many thousands of repetitions.
- Microsoft Dynamics,Sugar,custom Access versions,several others.
Sugar is simple, able to be implemented and adapted by a decent developer, easy to teach, fast to implement.
Microsoft Dynamics is in the middle, all CRM functions, but not the workflow capabilities, need very good developer and configurator, must hire them in.
SF is hugely complex, see rest of review.
I would NOT implement SF or MS Dynamics in a small org, rather do Sugar or a custom other solution.
Microsoft Dynamics is in the middle, all CRM functions, but not the workflow capabilities, need very good developer and configurator, must hire them in.
SF is hugely complex, see rest of review.
I would NOT implement SF or MS Dynamics in a small org, rather do Sugar or a custom other solution.
Salesforce Feature Ratings
Using Salesforce.com
All. Most use if for CRM for all stages of custom courses (high level), open enrollment registration-payment, and invoicing.
Script genius, database admin, workflow analyst, report writer, business analyst for requirements, project management to handle the hundreds of moving pieces.
- CRM - contact, lead, opportunity, etc.
- Pricing, billing, invoicing, managing receivables.
- Marketing, list management, emails.
- Don't know of any.
- SIMPLIFY so current staff can maintain.
Salesforce Implementation
Change management was a major issue with the implementation - Training is more than information on how to do a task or workflow in Salesforce. It is also about *why* they should do their task that way using Salesforce. It disrupted every major process at the center, and so each should have been mapped, discussed, communicated, and prototyped, not just dropped on the staff. They clearly did not want to use Salesforce.