Premium Load and Performace Testing with NeoLoad
November 30, 2022

Premium Load and Performace Testing with NeoLoad

Wolfgang Gaida | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Tricentis NeoLoad

We like to
have easy-to-maintain test cases. That’s why we shifted load and performance
tests from JMeter to Neoload. Currently, we are testing web applications automated. SAP is in the queue.
But there are several learnings: In preparing the tests, we need
a storybook or a TOSCA automated end-to-end test case to minimize the effort
during scripting. This also contains login information and test data. No try
and error during scripting!

The execution phase is an online meeting that acts as a war room where all
necessary stakeholders are invited. They are responsible for monitoring the
systems and collecting traces. In the analysis phase, all collected
information is consolidated into a report. The results are discussed in the result meeting. Here we decide on measures and next steps. We learned that load
testing is a team sport.

Pros

  • Recording of test cases
  • Reporting the results
  • Maintaining the scripts

Cons

  • Usability of the GUI
  • Licence polica
  • 95% cheaper maintenance effort in comparison to JMeter
  • Faster performance testing
We use NeoLoad, Neoload Web, Jira, Xray, and Jenkins. NeoLoad is used for performance testing, and NeoLoad Web shows the results in the intranet. We are not only running manual performance tests. We have also implemented automated performance tests using Jenkins. The results of the automated performance tests are replicated in Jira and Xray. Each team member of the development teams and test team has access to the tools Jira and Neoload Web.
At the beginning of performance testing in our organization, we used Jmeter with high efforts of script maintenance. With NeoLoad, we increased the test coverage from 10% to 90% with 7 times greater system coverage. In addition, we implemented load and performance tests with NeoLoad, which are triggered automatically by Jenkins. They are executed as regression daily.
We used Jenkins for manual performance testing and had big efforts to script and evaluate the test results. Furthermore, the effort of maintaining and editing the scripts was very high. To generate a report, many tables must be analyzed. The efforts of these tasks are minimized since we used the great tool NeoLoad.

Do you think Tricentis NeoLoad delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Tricentis NeoLoad's feature set?

Yes

Did Tricentis NeoLoad live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Tricentis NeoLoad go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Tricentis NeoLoad again?

Yes

Well suited: Web applications in intranet or internet - The results are reported in a well-organized report which can be the basis for further and deep analysis, which is the basis for defects and corrections resp. maintenance and some tuning measured by development. Less appropriate: We also tested SAP apps, but we have less experience here.

Comments

More Reviews of Tricentis NeoLoad