Simple but extremely useful testing platform
July 13, 2022
Simple but extremely useful testing platform
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with UsabilityHub
We use UsabilityHub for quick remote unmoderated testing of eCommerce feature designs before they get implemented by developers. Our department is responsible for rolling out designs for desktop, mobile web, Android, IOS, and iPad. Usabilityhub allows us to test ideas for these platforms rapidly and cheaply at a wireframing level and also at a visual design level. We have our own tester database and that allows us to gather responses cheaply and timely.
- Covers the most common unmoderated testing abilities.
- Allows testing with an external source of users.
- Well presented results and ability to download raw response data.
- Improving the ability of switching off the collection of responses.
- Different layout of the dashboard to find tests easier.
- Date filter for tests.
- Highlighting the template library when onboarding.
- Shareable testing link for external testers
- Unlimited number of tests
- Variation testing that simulates A/B
- Increase in testing frequency per quarter.
- Increase in approved projects for developments.
- Few reverts per project.
Maze has a more comprehensive reporting presentation compared to Usabilityhub. Maze's interface is clean and modern but it lacks a simple intuitive testing set found in UsabilityHub. The terminology of a Maze is slightly confusing, flow tests are integrated with only Figma, Xd, Invision, Sketch, and Marvel prototypes. The final test interface shown to users is confusing and could have been simpler like UsabilityHub.
Do you think Lyssna delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Lyssna's feature set?
Yes
Did Lyssna live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Lyssna go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Lyssna again?
Yes