Adobe Acrobat DC is the current version of the well-established document / PDF management solution, part of the Adobe Document Cloud (the other part being Adobe's eSign services based on technology acquired with EchoSign in 2011).
I use Dropbox Business, however, primarily to save shared files. I'm aware it has other functions, but our office doesn't really use them, such as the signature feature.
The various free options available from Adobe Acrobat provide a much better option than any of the other free options available on the website where you cannot trust the security, providing a more robust and secure option. Many of the competitors are also much more difficult to …
We used PDFTK for some command line PDF exports when we need to do things very quickly. This is very specific so we understand why Adobe Acrobat would not support this. In terms of PDF processing and editing we have not even found an alternative to replace all the features. I …
Adobe Acrobat has large functionality and is extremely easy to use. It was the platform that catered to all of our business use-cases. Other products that I have experienced only had one aspect such as the merging or the editing, where Adobe Acrobat has many capabilities that …
Adobe is the preferred software for document editing. However, for drawings and other mockups, Bluebeam appears to be better suited. It may also have something to do with users that deal with drawings and other mockups on a regular basis are already familiar with Bluebeam and …
I used iLovePDF when I was having trouble with converting a PDF to a jpg file in Adobe Acrobat. The jpg file kept coming out pixelated and low quality, but when I used iLovePDF, the jpg file came out high resolution and so I will sometimes use that program if I'm having issues …
PandaDoc did not offer a time and date stamp with the signature, which is why we had to stop using their services, as it is a requirement with Social Security. Our office was using Adobe Acrobat for separate uses, and we also used DocuSign specifically for retainer documents, …
It has a better competitive price and provides more options than DocuSign or Canva when it comes to editing text documents. Have the ability to Edit not only text but reorder pages on a document makes it easier. Also, you can integrate the design option such as photoshop by …
Adobe Acrobat is far more visual than any other document editor/viewer. As a veteran in the market, it understands its customers' needs well and has managed to stay relevant and keep its tools up-to-date. Furthermore, it maintains a good balance between the number of tools it …
Adobe Acrobat is great for organizations to use, while the other tools are mostly targeted to individual users. We have tried other software, Adobe products with their ecosystem and different products with the same subscription, ended up being more useful than buying different …
I am sure it works fine but I do not have any reason to ever use it instead of or in addition to acrobat. If the software is working fine, has the features you need and is already well known by the staff, it would be foolish to switch to a different software.
I don't know if it's the many years of experience I have using Adobe Acrobat or that they just seem to evolve along with the industry, the other programs I have tried (not by choice) just don't seem to have the abilities I have found and used with Adobe Acrobat.
Adobe Acrobat runs in a parallel way to these other products. Only Illustrator has a function that you can save files as PDF and read them in acrobat Reader. And you can open PDF files and edit them. The thing is that for simple things and simple modifications Adobe Acrobat has …
Adobe Acrobat is far superior to Microsoft Edge's PDF reader. It is far more robust in the features that are offered without sacrificing any user friendliness.
Bluebeam offers more detailed editing features, specifically for things like construction documents. However, …
Adobe Acrobat is better for a few reasons: it has more powerful capabilities like editing, it's stable, it's exported files are universally compatible. The two I named above are ok in a pinch, but definitely not something we use if we can avoid it.
Adobe Acrobat is the best tool to be able to view and amend documents especially for accessibility. While some other products might be better for editing the documents Adobe Acrobat will allow you to do a full accessibility report and ensure that the content of the document is …
I have used eCopy Pro before. This, when I used it, was very limited on what I can do with whole pages or electronic signatures. It did not at the time have the function to get an electronic signature directly. It would allow me to erase meta data, but I am not sure that is …
For what we need the application for, Acrobat is the right software. Yes, it is the right tool for the job and for our organization to complete the projects we need it to do and succeed with.
Acrobat is well suited when sharing information with different parts/levels of my company where access to specific software is unavailable to all employees who need to see the information. For example, my tradesmen do not have access to MS Excel in the field, so a PDF creates that accessibility. As for a scenario where it is less appropriate, I cannot think of one.
Adobe Acrobat works seamlessly with the other Adobe products we use that are industry-standard. We will certainly continue to use Adobe InDesign, Photoshop, and Illustrator, meaning it will always be convenient to work seamlessly with Adobe Acrobat for our organization. We are happy with the performance of Acrobat and it's meets our expectations.
I am able to rely on the software. I am aware that I barely scratch the surface of what it can do outside of the basics on a pc, but it is reassuring to know whatever I need it to do and whatever platform, it will work well.
We have not had availability issues with Adobe Acrobat, or at least none that I am personally aware of. Some may encounter crashes of the software during outages of electricity in their city or neighborhood, which no one can plan for, but with generators in our organization, we have been lucky not to have outages
One of the best features of Adobe Acrobat is its speed and stability. When dealing with massive multi-page files, having to reload a crashed program over and over again would slow down progress unnecessarily. And expanding on that, having the table of contents generated allows me to skip to different pages with ease, a necessary feature with exceptionally long files. word searches are even more helpful with text recognition.
For a while, Acrobat DC crashed pretty frequently. I contacted Adobe Acrobat support about the problem. At first support was unable to provide a solution. After about a month Adobe's software engineers provided a fix. I just wish it had taken less than a month to solve the problem.
I was not involved with the implementation process, so I cannot answer this question. However, when it was installed on my computer system, they did so virtually. I just sat there while they took control of my computer over the network and watch them install it, lickety split
I don't know if it's the many years of experience I have using Adobe Acrobat or that they just seem to evolve along with the industry, the other programs I have tried (not by choice) just don't seem to have the abilities I have found and used with Adobe Acrobat.
I find that many users aren't aware of many features of the software they use, nor may they be comfortable with learning multiple-step processes. For the simplest of PDF purposes (scanning, downloading, exporting), it gets a thumbs-up. For anything involving electronic signatures, meh--causes eyes to glaze over, or forgetting what all is involved.