TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Adobe Send & Track vs. OpenText MBPM vs. SAP NetWeaver BPM

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Adobe Send & Track

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AAdobe Send & Track (formerly SendNow) is Adobe's managed file transfer system.N/A

    OpenText MBPM

    Score7.2 out of 10
    N/AOpenText acquired BPM solution Metastorm in 2011, and has rebranded the product as OpenText MBPM. It is an alternative BPM solution to OpenText's primary BPM offering called OpenText Cordys Business Process Management.N/A

    SAP BPM

    Score7 out of 10
    N/ASAP NetWeaver Business Process Management is a business process management offering and application infrastructure. It supports joint modeling of processes, central process execution via a Java-based engine, provision of interfaces for users, and integration of business rules into processes.N/A
    Pricing
    Adobe Send & TrackOpenText MBPMSAP BPM
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Adobe Send & TrackOpenText MBPMSAP BPM
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Adobe Send & TrackOpenText MBPMSAP BPM
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Adobe Send & Track and OpenText MBPM and SAP NetWeaver BPM
    Feature
    Adobe Send & Track
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText MBPM
    7.0
    3 Ratings
    10% below category average
    SAP NetWeaver BPM
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    26% above category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings7.93 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings9.02 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings4.03 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of Adobe Send & Track and OpenText MBPM and SAP NetWeaver BPM
    Feature
    Adobe Send & Track
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText MBPM
    7.3
    3 Ratings
    13% below category average
    SAP NetWeaver BPM
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Process designer00 Ratings8.13 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Process simulation00 Ratings7.13 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Business rules engine00 Ratings9.02 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    SOA support00 Ratings6.02 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Process player00 Ratings7.02 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Support for modeling languages00 Ratings8.02 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Form builder00 Ratings6.93 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Model execution00 Ratings6.13 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Collaboration
    Comparison of Collaboration features of Adobe Send & Track and OpenText MBPM and SAP NetWeaver BPM
    Feature
    Adobe Send & Track
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText MBPM
    7.6
    3 Ratings
    9% below category average
    SAP NetWeaver BPM
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Social collaboration tools00 Ratings7.63 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Content Management Capabilties
    Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Adobe Send & Track and OpenText MBPM and SAP NetWeaver BPM
    Feature
    Adobe Send & Track
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText MBPM
    6.0
    2 Ratings
    30% below category average
    SAP NetWeaver BPM
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Content management00 Ratings6.02 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Adobe Send & TrackOpenText MBPMSAP BPM
    Small Businesses
    FileZilla
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Process Street
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Process Street
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    FileZilla
    Score9.2 out of 10
    TIBCO® BPM Enterprise
    Score8 out of 10
    TIBCO® BPM Enterprise
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT
    Score7.6 out of 10
    IBM Business Automation Workflow
    Score10 out of 10
    IBM Business Automation Workflow
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Adobe Send & TrackOpenText MBPMSAP BPM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.1
    (5 ratings)
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Adobe Send & TrackOpenText MBPMSAP BPM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Adobe
    This software works amazingly good when I need to send large volume office files to multiple clients in very less time. I just need to upload all the documents from my cloud storage and add all the recipients. And in just one click they all my documents in real time. It also let me know when they open my documents. It also helps them to preview the documents before downloading.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Metastorm is well-suited for scenarios in which internal stress testing an application is needed in a hurry before showcasing it to potential customers. It supports different views of the process from Swimlane perspective, so different methodologies can be handled. It is an Enterprise level tool and handles both small and large projects quite well, although smaller companies may be stressed out by the amount of time it takes to properly maintain the application.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    It is well suited when we need to integrate business processes with SAP ERP and SAP CRM - the solution can be integrated with business rules/procedures defined in SAP ERP/CRM and NetWeaver can be used to monitor the rules and flag off exceptions. When there are multiple workflows running, it tends to slow down running of these processes. Also, it entirely depends on SAP portal for it to run efficiently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Adobe
    • Text edits, which allow for addendums
    • Quicker work flow
    • Confirmed recipients
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Complex routing of tasks based on calculated criteria
    • Linking between tasks and accessing relevant information
    • Organising, scheduling and prioritising
    • Different views for different people
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Virtual paper trail. Iterations of process and current documentation are all stored as "artifacts", leaving a great trail.
    • Configuration of users. BPM somewhat magically determines which users will be impacted and automates rules.
    • A pro (that is also a con) is the design interface. If you know what you are doing, it is incredibly powerful and malleable.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Adobe
    • Unavailability of Apple iCloud integration.
    • No other drawback found.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The Metastorm process engine is based on an older version of .NET. Updating to a newer version would resolve several known issues with .NET email functionality.
    • Metastorm builds web pages at run time. While the UI presented to the end user is fine, the Document Object Model is convoluted and subject to change with new releases. Providing a more simplified DOM or at very least a custom function to replace document.getElementById() would make client-side scripting a much more powerful tool.
    • One function that I've seen Metastorm competitors do well, is email wizards. Having a WYSIWYG email editor would be really nice.
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Live readings would be nice.
    • Easier to maneuver
    • Work with all systems with the press of one keystroke
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Adobe
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    There are other products that seem to be a better fit for future initiatives.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    As a big fan of SAP in general, the BPM solution fits right in with all the other things SAP does well, and does it with incredible efficiency
    Read full review
    Usability
    Adobe
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    Although it is intuitive to use it does require training
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Adobe
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    Great customer service for an API support related query
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    We have our own tech support for systems, I would say they probably could use more training on it, I don't really think it's anything regarding the SAP system, but more the knowledge they have on the system itself. It seems to take longer for them to fix any issues we may come across.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Adobe
    This is an amazing software for sending files very conveniently. So we did not use any other software for this purpose. I am extremely happy with its services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    We found that OpenText MBPM held its own quite well against IBM BPM. We ended up choosing OpenText MBPM due to the analytics, complex routing, and the ease of SOA service integration. Furthermore, the ability to quickly develop simple User interfaces make this tool a daily component of our most-used toolbox components.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    I found the initial setup of NetWeaver is much simpler than other products especially in an SAP environment where we have SAP ERP/HRM/CRM as it can be well integrated with other SAP products. The only drawback is the need/dependency on SAP Portal. It is better suited in an environment where SAP ERP is running.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Adobe
    • Quicker Workflow
    • Happy vendors/clients
    • Less mailbox clutter
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The development of the ticketing system has enabled us to greatly improve customer relationships
    • The scheduling and allocation of the tasks has reduced both the number of open tickets and the turnaround time to resolution
    • Management information from the system has improved decision making
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Helped us harness integrated benefit from having SAP ERP/CRM by leveraging NetWeaver to define business processes/rules and monitor exceptions
    • Did not have any negative experience except for the fact that at times when multiple rules run, it can be somewhat slow
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots