Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Agile Hive
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
The world of work is constantly changing. Agile work processes in particular are becoming increasingly popular. Even large companies are trying to introduce agile working methods. For many, the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is the right solution for their agile teams. However, implementing SAFe with all its features such as providing reports, visualizing dependencies and automated documentation is not always easy in reality. Many companies spend a lot of time and money searching for the right…N/A
Aurea Process
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Aurea Process (formerly CX Process) from Aurea Software in Austin is a business process management offering, based on Savvion BPM.
$200,000
per year
ibi iProcess (discontinued)
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
ibi iProcess (or TIBCO iProcess) was a BPM product used to handle human-centric and integration-centric processes. The product is no longer available for sale.N/A
Pricing
Agile HiveAurea Processibi iProcess (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
License
$200,000
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Agile HiveAurea Processibi iProcess (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Agile HiveAurea Processibi iProcess (discontinued)
Features
Agile HiveAurea Processibi iProcess (discontinued)
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive
7.8
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
ibi iProcess (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Task Management7.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools8.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive
10.0
1 Ratings
24% above category average
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
ibi iProcess (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Velocity Calculation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
5.3
1 Ratings
38% below category average
ibi iProcess (discontinued)
7.7
1 Ratings
1% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings6.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings6.01 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings4.01 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
5.8
1 Ratings
36% below category average
ibi iProcess (discontinued)
8.4
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Process designer00 Ratings6.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings7.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings5.01 Ratings8.01 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings5.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings7.01 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings5.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Support for modeling languages00 Ratings00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
4.0
1 Ratings
70% below category average
ibi iProcess (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools00 Ratings4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Agile Hive
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
4.0
1 Ratings
68% below category average
ibi iProcess (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Content management00 Ratings4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Agile HiveAurea Processibi iProcess (discontinued)
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.4 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.4 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.3 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Agile HiveAurea Processibi iProcess (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(4 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Agile HiveAurea Processibi iProcess (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Seibert Group GmbH
Agile Hive is used for our value train
within a SAFe setup. Every quarter we organize a so-called Product Increment
(PI) Planning, where we plan all Features and Enablers in Agile Hive.
Based on the priority of the Product Manager all teams plan their Features and
Enablers accordingly to the sprints that are determined by the Release Train
Engineer and set up in Agile Hive. The teams then create User Stories and
estimate them and based on their sprint velocity (defined in Agile Hive)
Product Owners can see how many Features and Enablers are realistic in one
quarter (Product Increment). Further, dependencies across teams can be defined
and made visible in Agile Hive, so that the plan is feasible. Without Agile
Hive it would be hard or impossible to plan across several teams within a value
train and to manage all dependencies. Additionally, with Agile Hive the plan is
more realistic, so what can be achieved within one quarter in product
development.
Read full review
Aurea
The tool has potential. Its capabilities and visual aspects could be considered rather basic but this might improve, particularly if the business intelligence/analytics aspect is leveraged. Once running well, it could allow (perhaps smaller) companies to successfully improve their customers' experiences through digitalizing customer journey - and we all know that customer loyalty goes a long way. However, whether or not the tool is comprehensive enough to deliver this for larger companies with more complex, multi- and omni-channel interactions is yet to be seen...
Read full review
Discontinued Products
iProcess is a perfect BPM tool that has been able to solve complex business problems and situations, but with time newer and easier to use tools have also been developed by competing companies and thus this tool needs to evolve with the competition. Newer and more easy to use tools are also available from TIBCO as well such as AMX BPM.
Read full review
Pros
Seibert Group GmbH
  • Roadmapping in terms of defining epics and planning them across a timeline and across teams.
  • Showing dependencies within teams and across teams and over time horizon.
  • Create transparency throughout the product organization and teams about what is planned.
Read full review
Aurea
  • Face-lifted platforms: CX Messenger (formerly Sonic), CX Monitor (formerly Actional), CX Process (formerly Savvion)
  • User-friendly UI
  • Relatively painless implementation
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Performance. TIBCO iProcess is the most performant BPM I've even seen.
  • Manage large workloads. It can handle tens of thousands users and groups, hundreds of thousand or million live cases.
  • It can also manage very large and complex process definitions.
  • Very stable, once you get your business process up and running it is very stable.
Read full review
Cons
Seibert Group GmbH
  • I believe the training and support could be more hands on and easier.
  • The Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira product can be a bit robust to understand.
  • Having Knowledge transfer videos can help more than documentations.
Read full review
Aurea
  • Standard edition is significantly lighter touch than the (pricier) Enterprise version
  • There are similar solutions on the market that are competitively prices and offer positive user experience
  • Data migration can be tricky at times
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • It is complex to use.
  • The official support for the tool is not available anymore through TIBCO.
Read full review
Usability
Seibert Group GmbH
It has in general a good usability, but there are some downsides, the big picture view of the entire product increment is too static, so there is no zoom in or zoom out. Mostly throughout planning it is necessary to zoom in to a sprint level and manage the user stories there. Also, the pig picture view has some limitations, because you cannot read the entire user story name (boxes are too small).
Read full review
Aurea
No answers on this topic
Discontinued Products
It integrates all the BPM principles along with the great user interface and independent modules and engines. All the modules are separate and stand alone and thus provides easier understanding and ease of support.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Seibert Group GmbH
With Jira Software alone it is also possible to plan a SAFe product increment planning, but it would be nearly impossible to see the overall big picture of all product teams involved in a release train. So, the planning on sprint level for one team would be more efficient, but the planning for a whole quarter with all dependencies across teams would be not feasible to present. Therefore, Agile SAFe enables value trains an efficient way to plan a product increment.
Read full review
Aurea
No answers on this topic
Discontinued Products
iProcess is a previous generation product, it lacks OSGi and cloud so it is seen as "old". Due to this, it is difficult to choose new installations. All other options seem shiny in comparison. But regarding performance and stability, it is still unsurpassed.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Seibert Group GmbH
  • More transparency.
  • Better product decisions.
  • Saving time and resources.
  • Less critical dependencies.
Read full review
Aurea
  • As our customers vary in size and maturity, the ROI ranges accordingly.
  • For younger, smaller businesses this is a useful tool. Digitalization of he customer journey has certainly helped save time and efforts in many cases.
  • For more mature market players the tool is not always comprehensive enough. Dashboard and report personalization take time and efforts, and sometimes it feels that a dedicated BI tool would be a more suitable solution.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Numbers are difficult to crunch, the best impact is that you always know the status of a single business case and the system runs fast and smoothly; your users will forget what waiting is.
  • Case tracking is perfectly accurate, having that you can extract statistical data and predict and optimize your business very accurately.
  • TIBCO iProcess administrators must be quite skilled; that increases your overall costs so the ROI will be delayed a bit.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Aurea Process Screenshots

Screenshot of CX Platform enables leading companies to modernize, automate, and monitor their back office by bridging legacy SOA solutions to modern micro-service and container-based architectures.