Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Airtable
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Airtable is a project management and collaboration platform designed to enable content pipelines, product management, events planning, user research, and more. It combines spreadsheet,database, calendar, and kanban functionality within one platform.
$24
per month per seat
Claris FileMaker
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Claris' FileMaker is presented as a Workplace Innovation Platform, and is used to create a custom app. Manual processes can be automated with Claris FileMaker Pro, and apps can be created to manage contacts, track inventory, organize projects, etc.
$21
per month per user
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
SAP IQ (formerly SAP Sybase IQ) is a columnar relational database management system (RDBMS) optimized for Big Data analytics.N/A
Pricing
AirtableClaris FileMakerSAP IQ
Editions & Modules
Team
$24
per month per user
Business
$54
per month per user
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Platform Subscription
$21
per month per user
Individual desktop license
$594
one-time fee
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AirtableClaris FileMakerSAP IQ
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AirtableClaris FileMakerSAP IQ
Considered Multiple Products
Airtable
Chose Airtable
I am very familiar with FileMaker Pro. I grew up on FMP. But unless you "grew up" with FMP, the learning curve for newbies is really steep. Also, we are a very small, start-up nonprofit and Airtable not only fits our immediate needs but it also will allow us to grow into the …
Chose Airtable
Our existing database was created for us several years ago in Filemaker. It is incredibly sophisticated but often times is proving to be challenging to operate or update for current uses. Airtable has provided a level of flexibility to create a number of workarounds outside of …
Chose Airtable
Airtable offers fewer features when it comes to HTML/web forms and user management, but has great plugins, and its straight-forward, intuitive UI offers a solution for users looking for an immediate answer on cloud-based relational database challenges.
Chose Airtable
Airtable is much more intuitive to a naive user than Filemaker. Development time is also greatly reduced.
Chose Airtable
Intuitive, easy to use, fast, great for attachments (uploading in behind other processes - the app actually really works while it finishes uploads)
Chose Airtable
I've stated this in earlier sections but to put it simply, Airtable provides a way to create a customizable database with standardized metadata across archival collections without being overly complex or costly. This has supported our description of paper materials. The pro–a …
Chose Airtable
Airtable was a more affordable, more mobile, and more versatile platform. The options for future integration were greater for us with Airtable; the mobile opportunities give our Foundation flexibility; and since our team is based in several locations, the sharing and cloud …
Claris FileMaker
Chose Claris FileMaker
Easy to get started and Includes starter solutions for every situation by Anyone with access can edit the program by using many plugins available to extend functionality such as Changing field/database/script names after the fact is free specially For the most part, drag and …
SAP IQ

No answer on this topic

Features
AirtableClaris FileMakerSAP IQ
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Airtable
7.8
235 Ratings
1% above category average
Claris FileMaker
-
Ratings
SAP IQ
-
Ratings
Task Management8.9199 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management8.0193 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.489 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling7.4165 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation8.0143 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Team Collaboration8.0218 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.3108 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology8.580 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management7.5170 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration7.1115 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access5.8191 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking7.693 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management8.0102 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management7.2127 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Airtable
-
Ratings
Claris FileMaker
8.1
4 Ratings
4% below category average
SAP IQ
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling00 Ratings8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces00 Ratings4.63 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security00 Ratings9.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management00 Ratings8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability00 Ratings8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability00 Ratings9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AirtableClaris FileMakerSAP IQ
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 9.5 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.8 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 9.5 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AirtableClaris FileMakerSAP IQ
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(239 ratings)
7.5
(51 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.5
(5 ratings)
5.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(36 ratings)
8.8
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(30 ratings)
1.0
(6 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(2 ratings)
5.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(2 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(2 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AirtableClaris FileMakerSAP IQ
Likelihood to Recommend
Airtable
Airtable is an ideal platform for small and growing businesses to keep track of just about EVERYTHING they need to keep things running smoothly. It's a great way to keep tasks organized, and keep everyone on the same page with progress on all things. Our company finds the kanban particularly useful, as products go through a lifecycle from ideation to retirement, it's good to keep a database of what is in production, what's working, and what we've tried before. I can see the platform being challenging with much larger businesses, but for the small to medium businesses I've used the platform with, it is ideal.
Read full review
Claris
If your company is really small, I can understand the need for a product like this. However, I would go for MS Access... FileMaker Pro can not be integrated with other systems (like MS Access can at least be handled by C# for instance, and can be integrated with MS Excel or even SQL server). I'm really not sure in what scenario one would choose for FileMaker Pro. If your application or company grows bigger, you're going to have a problem to move to another environment. Also, the fact that only one person can work with the backend at any given time is a problem in a somewhat larger company.
Read full review
SAP
Does data compression very well, produces query results very quickly, ability to scale up as data volume/size grow in an organization, row level versioning is in memory and hence the speed. It is a very stable product for large enterprises. More detailed documentation on how to use this product in the initial stages would be really welcome.
Read full review
Pros
Airtable
  • I can create tables, create and customize fields
  • Airtable has capabilities commonly found in spreadsheet applications, but also has some of the features found in databases.
  • The ability to filter fields. I set up a filter on the status field, so when a project is marked, complete, on hold, or canceled, that record is hidden from my current projects table view. If it is marked complete, the record is moved to the completed projects table view. In this way I can easily access a record of past projects
  • Being able to duplicate tables and create alternate views
  • Collapse and expand records. When I collapse the rows, I can easily scan current projects, next steps, project status, and due dates. When I expand the row, or field, I can see more detailed information about that field or record very easily. I can also expand or open the entire record. This is is helpful, when I am entering a lot of information to multiple fields in that record.
Read full review
Claris
  • The relational database management system makes the program highly customizable to fit the needs of any product. You can add a ton of information to each record and update your inventory on a regular basis with an Excel import or manually inside of the record. It has the capability to incorporate barcoding, which can manage your available inventory with ease.
  • The scripting language allows FileMaker to automatically calculate complex algorithms automatically or generate report outs with the click of a button. This allows for greater UI, especially with active users who are not familiar with writing code. Almost all of our internal data is linked to the FileMaker database
  • The server license allows many users to update the database in real time, which is handy if your inventory is constantly changing. We have users with Macs, PCs, iPhones and handheld tablets linked to our FileMaker database and they are updating the information constantly throughout the day.
  • If you invest some time into formatting and scripting the database, there is a high ease of use for users without knowledge of any programming or FileMaker itself.
Read full review
SAP
  • Inserting millions of rows of data takes seconds.
  • Aggregating billions of rows of data is insanely fast (compared to Oracle, Sybase, and SQL Server).
Read full review
Cons
Airtable
  • When records are deleted, there could be more options for what happens to associated records in other tables.
  • Multi-select fields should be sortable.
  • The per-user pricing model can be cumbersome when you need to share bases with third parties but can't use a publicly accessible URL.
Read full review
Claris
  • Developer features need to be beefed up - namely adding the ability to search code for a phrase or keyword and the ability to do the same in the "relationship graph" in the database.
  • Add ability for users to edit the same table record at the same time by version control.
  • Allow Filemaker Server to use more than 1 core; currently multi-processing is not supported and it can be tricky to find just the right server to support the application you've built to the fullest capacity.
Read full review
SAP
  • The pricing schedule is a bit expensive and cumbersome.
  • Licensing for a virtual machine is difficult to understand.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Airtable
We will 10/10 renew the use of Airtable because it has brought great value to our team. Not only is Airtable affordable, but it's also user-friendly and helps our team be efficient. We no longer need to rely on Excel spreadsheets being passed from person to person via email. Furthermore, we aren't dealing with corrupt Excel spreadsheets and the need to salvage data when a file is accidentally altered.
Read full review
Claris
It it not really up to me but my opinion does have some weight in the decision and the reason I would renew my use FileMaker Pro 8.5 is because I am finally getting used to it! Now that I have been working with the program, tasks have become quicker and projects are getting done faster. File Maker Pro 8.5 really is a versatile tool and I think we are just scratching the surface with it's abilities.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Usability
Airtable
IMO the usability of this product is its greatest asset. The UI is clean and the menus are intuitive to the point where I'd feel confident having a non-spreadsheety colleague take on building an Airtable for the first time with next to no training. I can't say that about every table-like software product that I've used such as Notion.
Read full review
Claris
It's almost what it should be after so may years and with Apple's longevity and strength behind it. For people who earn their living based on efficiency I think there are too many developer obstacles that waste time and therefore money.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Airtable
I have rarely experience downtime, compared to other tools, and given how much time we spend on the tool. Even if there were to be, their updates on it are very timely, and our support team are able to provide any questions regarding
Read full review
Claris
mostly never issues and if there are they are resolved fast
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Performance
Airtable
I never had any issues with load time, even with the integrations that we use today (google sheets) However, I'm curious if adding additional layers of integrations would slow down performance. We do carry quite a bit of data in Airtable, but, again, no impact on overall performance
Read full review
Claris
for the most part but lots of error messages if you type something h correctly
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Airtable
Airtable has great support. They have a variety of support features to answer any questions. They have great self teaching instructions for templates and product tours. They also have support for teams and project management. They also have a fantastic customer help line. They are able and willing to answer customer questions and never have customers waiting long
Read full review
Claris
The forums are great with lots of helpful experts and the staff monitor them to provide help where needed. There have been a couple of unique technical issues I've had to deal with that I haven't been able to get resolved so I chose to score this a 9 instead of a 10.
Read full review
SAP
SAP IQ support is top-notch. I prefer starting all my SAP IQ support tickets with their Instant Messenger, where the majority of our issues are resolved. If it makes it to their ticketing system, they are very prompt at responding and very knowledgeable in the platform.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Airtable
This training was done in-house, but the Airtable team provided resources and how to guides to ensure that we covered all components of the system
Read full review
Claris
easy to follow along and was able to jump in right away
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Airtable
Recorded trainings were provided by the Airtable team. Great as an evergreen resources to new team members and for anyone that wants to refresh their Airtable knowledge
Read full review
Claris
No answers on this topic
SAP
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Airtable
Training all users was an important part of the implementation, which did take considerable time and effort. At first glance without training, the content calendar can be overwhelming because of the amount of data. The features within Airtable seem to be endless but our team was able to identify the most important to be successful.
Read full review
Claris
Suggest you use an iterative R.A.D. or AGILE development approach. (i.e. rather than writing a gigantic spec for a system, then building it). FileMaker facilitates quick prototypes. Developing an example, then allowing users to "try it out" is a snap.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Airtable
Airtable was a really good fit for this specific use case as it provided a huge number of collaboration features in an intuitive and pleasant-to-use interface. The free tier worked initially with our work, and the upgrade pathway was fair and made sense for us.
Read full review
Claris
FileMaker is still the quickest way to go from zero to having a minimum viable working solution. Simple solutions can be built in as little as a afternoon of development. It is the only tool I am aware of which allows tech savy end users with domain knowledge to build bespoke apps for their businesses without undertaking professional software development training.
Read full review
SAP
SAP IQ is perhaps an under-marketed product in the sense that it is able to scale up very well and perform much faster and more efficiently than other products such as Oracle - when we ran multiple large queries on both Sybase IQ and Oracle, we found that that results were much faster in Sybase IQ and this gave the confidence to go for this product.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Airtable
I did not help purchase the product, but Airtable's per user pricing structure is inconvenient when some users only need occasional or read-only use.
Read full review
Claris
No answers on this topic
SAP
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Airtable
There are TONS of opportunity to scale, but I think it's a matter if you have the time and resources to do so because the initial setup can be fairly time consuming and prioritized dedication
Read full review
Claris
it's most definitely does as we are a unique business to use this for scholarship awarding
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Airtable
  • It gives us a real-time experience of working.
  • Through this platform, I always have the idea bout which of my team member is working on which particular part of the project, I can easily track their progress, and also I can easily correct them where it is required by adding sticky notes, by sending the attachments and URLs.
  • Quality services.
Read full review
Claris
  • We are a more agile company because of FileMaker. A few of us who are tech-savvy enough to manage the database (but are not professional developers) can make needed adjustments to our database without having to employ an in-house developer or contract with a 3rd party. As our business processes evolve and change, it's easy to update the database to accommodate those changes.
Read full review
SAP
  • The ROI over a number of years has been good. Seeing as how we use it for billing, it has an obvious ROI to us.
  • As they have been modifying their licensing structure, it's been difficult to keep up and understand how they work.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Airtable Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of