Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AlgoSec
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
AlgoSec, from the company of the same name in Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, is a firewall security management option. The service now includes the CMDB capabilities of Prevasio, which was acquired by AlgoSec.N/A
FireMon
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
FireMon is a real-time security policy management solution built for today’s complex multi-vendor, enterprise environments. Supporting the latest firewall and policy enforcement technologies spanning on-premises networks to the cloud, FireMon delivers visibility and control across the entire IT landscape to automate policy changes, meet compliance standards, to minimize policy-related risk. Since creating their policy management solution in 2004, FireMon states they've helped…N/A
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Vulnerability management specialist Tenable offers their cloud application and container security platform Tenable Web App Scanning (formerly Tenable.io), a vulnerability management tool that emphasizes visibility of web applications, automatic scanning, and a unified view of cloud infrastructure and possible inconsistencies indicating a vulnerability.N/A
Pricing
AlgoSecFireMonTenable Vulnerability Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AlgoSecFireMonTenable Vulnerability Management
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AlgoSecFireMonTenable Vulnerability Management
Considered Multiple Products
AlgoSec
Chose AlgoSec
Algosec has multi vendor support including cisco aci, nsx, aws and azure security groups. While most other vendors are lacking in the spectrum of the vendors. The ROI is best on this product.
Chose AlgoSec
Algosec is user-friendly and easy to implement and manage. The best part is it can be installed on-premises as well as on the cloud. It visualizes the complex networks and creates a dynamic network topology map. Using Firewall Analyzer, security and operations teams can …
FireMon
Chose FireMon
Technically speaking FireMon Security Manager scored higher than the AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer. It is also less expensive than other solutions.
Chose FireMon
I already had experience with the Tufin and AlgoSec products, and the customization that FireMon provides is just not available with the other products. The licensing of FireMon over AlgoSec is another winner for us.
Chose FireMon
We performed a head-to-head PoC between FireMon and AlgoSec several years ago. Both platforms were well developed, but FireMon had the upper hand in three areas:
  1. Its UI was more unified and intuitive across the different components and products
  2. The reporting was better suited …
Chose FireMon
AlgoSec and Tufin both have initial issues during the POC stage, and FireMon even though with the changes they have made still works better and is more user friendly.
Chose FireMon
AlgoSec is a great tool, lower in cost as well.

FireMon has alot of capabilites, but our organization is not ready or have a use case yet for those features.
Chose FireMon
I has worked with AlgoSec and while they are very similar product, I find the FireMon is easier to understand and get rolling with. While both require some learning, FireMon is by far the easier one. Once you have an understanding of how things are arranged and labeled you can …
Chose FireMon
To be blunt, at the time of purchase most of these products appeared to do the same things in the same ways. What really brought us to the table with FireMon six years ago was their willingness to earn our business, and to this day they remain just as committed to keeping our …
Chose FireMon
AlgoSec and Tufin both are good tools but the cost involved for what they offer as services led us to go with Firemon.
Chose FireMon
FireMon has the most supported devices.
The UI is easy to use and intuitive.
There is a comprehensive list of built in compliance controls that are missing in the competition.
Chose FireMon
They are two very well done tools, FireMon is better suited for firewall rules evaluation, configuration and review, Tenable.io is better suited for CIS benchmarking. We ended up using both of them in the end, it really depends of your needs and what you are looking for, the …
Chose FireMon
We were impressed with FireMon's native cloud support and compliance reporting, in looking at other vendors we were not too impressed by their ability to support cloud-native technologies and their reporting was less than stellar. We did not want a solution that would last only …
Chose FireMon
For our use case, only FireMon met our needs with the systems we use.
Tenable Vulnerability Management

No answer on this topic

Features
AlgoSecFireMonTenable Vulnerability Management
Firewall Security Management
Comparison of Firewall Security Management features of Product A and Product B
AlgoSec
6.3
3 Ratings
23% below category average
FireMon
-
Ratings
Tenable Vulnerability Management
-
Ratings
Policy planning and rule management6.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Policy Orchestration5.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Device Discovery7.32 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Policy Compliance Auditing5.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Attack Path Simulation Testing7.12 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Scans8.92 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Firewall Rule Cleanup5.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
AlgoSec
-
Ratings
FireMon
-
Ratings
Tenable Vulnerability Management
8.4
2 Ratings
4% above category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings4.02 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
AlgoSec
-
Ratings
FireMon
-
Ratings
Tenable Vulnerability Management
8.8
2 Ratings
6% above category average
IT Asset Realization00 Ratings00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Authentication00 Ratings00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Web Scanning00 Ratings00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AlgoSecFireMonTenable Vulnerability Management
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.1 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.7 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
Score 8.6 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AlgoSecFireMonTenable Vulnerability Management
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(4 ratings)
7.9
(69 ratings)
10.0
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(7 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.3
(3 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(17 ratings)
8.8
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(48 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AlgoSecFireMonTenable Vulnerability Management
Likelihood to Recommend
AlgoSec
It works okay for auditing existing network systems but seems to have trouble with cloud configurations.
Read full review
FireMon
FireMon is best used in a large environment (for example, I have >100
firewalls in my environment). It's best used when trying to improve
security posture and showing changes in firewall security over time. It
might not be the best choice for smaller environments or those that aren't concerned about security management.
Read full review
Tenable
I've been using this product since it began as an open source product, I really like it and for the money, I think it's probably the best choice for most companies who need a product like this. Over the years I've seen the interface change quite a bit and sometimes I think it's a bit unclear how to do certain things and the different packages can be confusing, these are the only reasons I'm giving it a 9 instead of a 10.
Read full review
Pros
AlgoSec
  • Firewall policy overview and optimisation by rule reordering and suggestions to delete unused rules
  • Network map overview and implement topology changes based on source destination and port
  • Pci audit results and recommendations for a better score
  • Discover application based flows through auto-discovery and make changes to those flow.
Read full review
FireMon
  • Give good real time reporting for anyone making a change to any of our firewalls
  • Provides good reporting tools that are out of box
  • Provide good customization tools that is specific to our needs
  • Upgrades are a simple process and support does relatively well with assisting us.
Read full review
Tenable
  • Setup of the internal scanner was fairly simple and straight forward.
  • An update came out for the internal scanner that allows you to add an Internal Certificate Authority for lookup.
  • Has automated reporting to keep executives and compliance departments informed.
  • Internal scanner can be configured to auto-update itself.
  • "Recast Rules" allows your organization to redefine a vulnerabilities' classification, if it is not applicable or your disagree.
  • External PCI scans allow you to remediate before submitting to Tenable.io for review.
  • Tenable.io staff was very patient and helpful. They provided some limited guidance with remediation.
  • Internal and External scans can be automated. schedule for the automated scans is very granular.
Read full review
Cons
AlgoSec
  • AlgoSec need to work on their support in India.
  • Insufficient documentation.
  • It should support other platforms like GCP, Alibaba, etc.
Read full review
FireMon
  • Some features could be added to the existing functionality which include NAT rules usage
  • Rule expiration normalization from firewalls rather than entering them in rule documentation
  • .csv exports of the files from the firewall pane only gives usage for 30 days by default and that should be increased
Read full review
Tenable
  • Expensive - You do pay a slight premium for the best product in the space.
  • Asset management is difficult to work with if you have a lot of asset turnover, the license can be ''held'' for 3-6 months after the asset is gone from your environment.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
AlgoSec
No answers on this topic
FireMon
The shell is locked out and we can't run any general centos commands. The implementation and maintainence of the arch is very complex. Even with the right identifiers on log messages the log collection keeps failing. The warning messages on the device are ambiguous. The log messages on firemon are a bit confusing and don't show the exact issue.
Read full review
Tenable
We like to renew tenable each year we have had it so far.
Read full review
Usability
AlgoSec
It worked great for on-site systems but does not scale effectively.
Read full review
FireMon
It save me time and I'm able to have the review - review the rule independently with using my time.
Read full review
Tenable
Overall it is good, it took a little while to understand it and figure things out but once you have a good grasp on it then, it is very good.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
AlgoSec
No answers on this topic
FireMon
FireMon has been relatively stable overall. However, there have been a handful of times where we had issues with the console. For example, we couldn't update which devices to include in a security assessment. The initial suggestion from support was to just reboot it. It seems like there weren't many other options available such as to restart services before going to the extreme of a complete reboot.
Read full review
Tenable
No answers on this topic
Performance
AlgoSec
No answers on this topic
FireMon
I'm not sure we have the largest implementation of FireMon out there but we do have a few 1000 devices being probed by FireMon. Overall, the system's performance has been rock solid. The console refreshes quickly and reports are generated within an expected timeframe.
Read full review
Tenable
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
AlgoSec
No answers on this topic
FireMon
FireMon technical support is awesome! They respond quickly to our requests and they are well trained and very knowledgeable about the tool. Some issues have to be referred to the development team, but technical support largely provides solutions for any issues that we may have.
Read full review
Tenable
Support is usually really great at walking you through any steps you need to take when you get stuck on something. There are a few false positives and errors that have come up over the years that required their help to get through. Unfortunately, the steps required to diagnose some problems are more tedious than I think should be necessary. (IE: SQL instances can throw errors that clog up your logs because one plugin affects it in a certain way. The process to diagnose this is to watch timestamps of plugins in a log while monitoring the SQL logs at the same time and using your best guess as to what is causing it.)
Read full review
Implementation Rating
AlgoSec
No answers on this topic
FireMon
Implementation is fairly simple. Most issues can be resolved by referencing manuals.
Read full review
Tenable
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
AlgoSec
User friendliness of Algosec is great!
Read full review
FireMon
I has worked with AlgoSec and while they are very similar product, I find the FireMon is easier to understand and get rolling with. While both require some learning, FireMon is by far the easier one. Once you have an understanding of how things are arranged and labeled you can easily import firewalls and begin to work on them to improve them
Read full review
Tenable
Tenable.io has a comparable set of features, with excellent support and a competitive price. After less than desirable experiences with another company, we moved to Tenable and haven't looked back since.
Read full review
Scalability
AlgoSec
No answers on this topic
FireMon
Firemon Is easily scalable and maintainable with any size team. Although it requires some tech debt, it is well worth the time to invest to ensure compliance is visible and reports are accurate. Although our environment is very large we do not fully utilize the scalability of the Firemon product.
Read full review
Tenable
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
AlgoSec
  • Algosec has helped customers across the globe optimize their firewall policies and bring the best performance off their devices
  • AlgoSec supports a wide range of devices and is constantly working to include support for many others
  • The support and professional services team at AlgoSec is very knowledgeable and supportive.
Read full review
FireMon
  • FireMon's Compliance Reporting provided an immediate and tangible benefit
  • FireMon helps identify egregious or erroneous rules quickly across multiple platforms
  • FireMon took our audit process from an Excel spreadsheet into a far more advanced process with readily available context for reviewers
Read full review
Tenable
  • Since this is a requirement for our PCI compliance and the cost is relatively low, the ROI isn't really something we need to think too much about, Tenable's pricing is fair and affordable.
Read full review
ScreenShots