Amazon API Gateway vs. SAP Integration Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon API Gateway
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
AWS offers the Amazon API Gateway supports the creation and publication of an API for web applications, as well as its monitoring and maintenance. The Amazon API Gateway is able to support thousands of API calls concurrently and provides traffic management, as well as monitoring and access control.
$0.90
Per Million
SAP Integration Suite
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Integration Suite is a modern, secure integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that connects applications, data, processes, and AI agents across SAP and non‑SAP environments.
$11,199
per year
Pricing
Amazon API GatewaySAP Integration Suite
Editions & Modules
Past 300 Million
$0.90
Per Million
First 300 Million
$1.00
Per Million
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon API GatewaySAP Integration Suite
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAccess to free tier services does not expire while there is an active Pay-As-You-Go or CPEA account with SAP. Once a free tier service limit has been reached users have the option to update from a free to a paid service plan in the same account.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon API GatewaySAP Integration Suite
Considered Both Products
Amazon API Gateway

No answer on this topic

SAP Integration Suite
Chose SAP Integration Suite
Great services and integrating features that make it easy to use and implement. Given the risk of cyber attacks in order to protect customer data SAP cloud platform is better respective to other competitors. It helps in reducing the cost of duplicating the hardware, and …
Chose SAP Integration Suite
We selected SAP just because we have everything in SAP and we did have a good sales team from SAP to convince us to use it. No doubt it's good.
Features
Amazon API GatewaySAP Integration Suite
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon API Gateway
9.1
14 Ratings
8% above category average
SAP Integration Suite
-
Ratings
API access control9.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies10.013 Ratings00 Ratings
API usage data8.013 Ratings00 Ratings
API user onboarding8.013 Ratings00 Ratings
API versioning9.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Usage billing and payments10.012 Ratings00 Ratings
API monitoring and logging10.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Amazon API Gateway
-
Ratings
SAP Integration Suite
7.9
269 Ratings
1% below category average
Pre-built connectors00 Ratings8.3254 Ratings
Connector modification00 Ratings7.8217 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration00 Ratings8.2248 Ratings
Data quality services00 Ratings8.0225 Ratings
Data security features00 Ratings8.2238 Ratings
Monitoring console00 Ratings7.1246 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon API GatewaySAP Integration Suite
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon API GatewaySAP Integration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(14 ratings)
8.4
(355 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(12 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
5.2
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.3
(7 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon API GatewaySAP Integration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
Experienced a lack of available programming languages while working on a minor project. I had to halt the project and wait for it to be added later. It took ages and had a hit on our productivity. It has a centralized management system which helps and an easy interface which helps to manage multiple tasks in case of large-scale operations and projects.
Read full review
SAP
Good at: 1. Integrations with in SAP applications, especially with event based triggers 2. Can be integrated very well with other BTP services to attain Batch processing and store credentials 3. Supports many authentication models Improvements: 1. No version history available compared to as it is available in S4HANA 2. Need a lot of improvement in git hub connections
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • API Gateway integrates well with AWS Lambda. This allows us to build a web server in the language and framework of our choice, deploy it as a Lambda function, and expose it through API Gateway.
  • API Gateway manages API keys. Building rate limiting and request quota features are not trivial (or interesting).
  • API Gateway's pricing can be very attractive for services that are accessed infrequently.
Read full review
SAP
  • The extensive catalog of pre package integrations that have in the discovery center. That allows developers to find solutions that can fit the needs.
  • Monitor of the integrations and api deployed.
  • API management has been for us a very usefull tool inside integration suite, to be able to have the API Hub with the documentation of our apis.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Client certificates are troublesome when trying to attach them to API GW stages.
  • Debugging across several services can be difficult when API GW is integrated with Route 53 and another service like Lambda or EC2/ELB.
  • Creating internal/private APIs, particularly with custom domains, can be unintuitive.
Read full review
SAP
  • Provide more pre-built integrations to use within SuccessFactors or other modules instead of everything having to be custom built
  • Support is unable to provide advice on custom builds so you often have to engage a 3rd party partner
  • Works best when you have the functional and technical teams working together. Otherwise, the system is too technical for a functional user to create integration and a technical user not always understand the functional perspective
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
SAP
It is in place, our system integrators are familiar with it, and it fits into the ecosystem. A better user interface, flow build and debugging experience would see it grow, many technical staff do not enjoy using it for this reason, however it is quite capable and powerful behind this one shortcoming.
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
It is a great product very reliable and stable for connecting various aws services like we connected with lambda function and it is working very well, never faced any issue after the setup. It also saves out lots of money as well as time after we implemented the automatic ec2 server recovery system
Read full review
SAP
The user interface is messy and not intuitive. It has a steep learning curve, and flows developed around are easy to make a mess with layout and can be difficult to follow. The debugging is also quite difficult, it takes some time to figure out how to follow the flow and examine data. Error handling is also difficult and not intuitive, it is better to let some errors leak and monitor through ALM.
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
We always had a great experience with the AWS support team. They were always on time and very dependable. It was a good partnership while we worked to resolve our issues.
Read full review
SAP
The support for SAP Integration Suite is satisfactory. We leverage SAP support through our manage services partner. So far, we have not had many major issues. One concern, to make our rating a ten, would be turnaround time on high priority incidents. SAP Integration Suite drives our key business functions forward. Without a reasonable service level agreement on turnaround, we sometimes find us running into issues running pay, etc.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
SAP
Work with an SAP implementation partner, if possible.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
When we tested Azure API Management at the time, it had serious connectivity issues, it was very unstable, and it needed to do a lot using the command line. Comparing with the AWS solution, which was more mature, and the fact that we have services in use on AWS, we ended up choosing to continue using AWS products. This so as not to run the risk of increasing latency in accesses, and of some functionality not working, due to being developed yet.
Read full review
SAP
Before deploying SAP Integration Suite, we assessed Oracle Financial Services Analytics and IBM Risk Analytics. While Oracle had proved its mettle in the exceptional database support and IBM in presenting risk model tools, SAP Integration Suite overwhelmed others by being effortlessly integrated with our existing banking framework.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • ROI is negative, you need either to hire them to work with you or spend days/weeks to figure out issues.
  • For some of the projects in the end it is not worth it, it is just a "buzz" to use serverless but not practical.
  • Service is easy to set up authorization and it is easy to manage.
Read full review
SAP
  • Positive impact would be availability of pre-defined integration content via templates.
  • One can re-use a template as a starting point to modify and adopt to client-specific integration flow.
  • Availability of adaptors and connectors, making it easier to piece together the integration flow.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Integration Suite Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of