Amazon Quick Sight is a cloud-based Business Intelligence (BI) service within Amazon Quick. It connects enterprise data sources to interactive dashboards, visualizations, natural-language analysis, and analytics workflows.
$24
per month per user
OpenText Magellan
Score9 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Magellan Analytics Suite leverages a comprehensive set of data analytics software to identify patterns, relationships and trends through data visualizations and interactive dashboards.
N/A
Pricing
Amazon Quick Sight
OpenText Magellan
Editions & Modules
Reader
$3
per month per user
Author
$24
per month per user
Reader Pro
$24
per month per user
Author Pro
$50
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon Quick Sight
OpenText Magellan
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Prospective buyers can also purchase a set number of sessions or questions in lieu of a monthly subscription.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Amazon Quick Sight
OpenText Magellan
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Amazon Quick Sight and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Amazon Quick Sight
10.0
6 Ratings
20% above category average
OpenText Magellan
7.0
2 Ratings
15% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
10.06 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
10.06 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Amazon Quick Sight and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Amazon Quick Sight
10.0
6 Ratings
22% above category average
OpenText Magellan
8.3
3 Ratings
4% above category average
Drill-down analysis
10.06 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
10.06 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
10.04 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
10.06 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Amazon Quick Sight and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Amazon Quick Sight
8.4
6 Ratings
2% above category average
OpenText Magellan
8.3
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web
8.03 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Publish to PDF
10.03 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Versioning
10.05 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
7.04 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Amazon Quick Sight and OpenText Magellan
Amazon Quicksight is a truly cloud-based solution so it works perfectly fine and saves a lot of expense in terms of hardware and maintenance. We can maintain it by ourselves by giving commands on UI. If you have connectivity issues then it can cause headaches because it's a cloud platform and it's a bit costly as compared to other services
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you do not have a large budget and are a large organization, I would steer clear of Actuate. If you are looking to do very complex washboarding, I would not use them. Your developers have to be very skilled to work with this. Plan to bring in consultants if necessary to help your process. Adhoc reporting is weak. If your pricing is user based and you expand, this could be very expensive.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I am no longer working for the company that was using Actuate but I believe they would continue to use it because the stitching costs would be to high. It would require a complete rewrite of the reports and the never version of Actuate (BIRT) even required an almost complete report rewrite
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It was helping us a lot as per our business needs. Reporting is way easy with QuickSight that helps us to understand the performance of campaigns effectively and so does the performance of sales individual. We can analyze the data and create a new strategies effectively. Setup and maintenance was way easy
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is quite intuitive to use. It is fit specifically for doing sentiment, emotion, and intention analysis as well as text classification and text summarization. I would have given 10 if it is fit for the purpose of doing image processing and analysis as well. There is a huge market to analyze video and image data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
All of the other reporting platforms my organization has used previously were within our CRM and not a standalone program. In that we were very limited in being able to slice and dice the data the way that we wanted to
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is vastly superior to these in many ways, for complex reporting it is a much more sophisticated solution. Visualizations are very good. Javascript extensibility is very powerful, others don't support this or as well. Pentaho and MS are both OLAP oriented. Pentaho is moving more toward big data, which was not our primary focus. Others are stuck in the Crystal Reports Band metaphor.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Actuate can handle 50 to 60 sub reports inside a report very well.
Dynamically creating the datasource, chart, graph, reports are the main advantages. We can do any level of drilling, and can create a performance matrix dashboard efficiently.