Amazon Tensor Flow vs. Jupyter Notebook

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon Tensor Flow
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Amazon TensorFlow enables developers to quickly and easily get started with deep learning in the cloud.N/A
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Jupyter Notebook is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents containing live code, equations, visualizations and narrative text. Uses include: data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. It supports over 40 programming languages, and notebooks can be shared with others using email, Dropbox, GitHub and the Jupyter Notebook Viewer. It is used with JupyterLab, a web-based IDE for…N/A
Pricing
Amazon Tensor FlowJupyter Notebook
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon Tensor FlowJupyter Notebook
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Amazon Tensor FlowJupyter Notebook
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Tensor Flow
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
8.5
21 Ratings
1% above category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings9.021 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources00 Ratings9.220 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection00 Ratings8.514 Ratings
MDM Integration00 Ratings7.415 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Tensor Flow
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
9.6
21 Ratings
13% above category average
Visualization00 Ratings9.621 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis00 Ratings9.621 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Tensor Flow
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
9.0
21 Ratings
9% above category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment00 Ratings9.320 Ratings
Data Transformations00 Ratings8.921 Ratings
Data Encryption00 Ratings8.514 Ratings
Built-in Processors00 Ratings9.314 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Tensor Flow
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
8.9
21 Ratings
5% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools00 Ratings9.020 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning00 Ratings9.218 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development00 Ratings9.221 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Tensor Flow
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
8.8
19 Ratings
3% above category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options00 Ratings8.819 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls00 Ratings8.718 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon Tensor FlowJupyter Notebook
Small Businesses
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mathematica
Mathematica
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Tensor FlowJupyter Notebook
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.4
(22 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Tensor FlowJupyter Notebook
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
A well-suited scenario for using AWS Tensor Flow is when having a project with a geographically dispersed team, a client overseas and large data to use for training. AWS Tensor Flow is less appropriate when working for clients in regions where it hasn't been allowed yet for use. Since smaller clients are in regions where AWS Tensor Flow hasn't been allowed for use, and those clients traditionally don't have enough hardware, this situation deters a wider use of the tool.
Read full review
Open Source
I've created a number of daisy chain notebooks for different workflows, and every time, I create my workflows with other users in mind. Jupiter Notebook makes it very easy for me to outline my thought process in as granular a way as I want without using innumerable small. inline comments.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) allows resizable compute capacity in the cloud, providing the necessary elasticity to provide services for both, small and medium-sized businesses.
  • Tensor Flow allows us to train our models much faster than in our on-premise equipment.
  • Most of the pre-trained models are easy to adapt to our clients' needs.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Simple and elegant code writing ability. Easier to understand the code that way.
  • The ability to see the output after each step.
  • The ability to use ton of library functions in Python.
  • Easy-user friendly interface.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • SageMaker isn't available in all regions. This is complicated for some clients overseas.
  • For larger instances, when using a GPU, it takes a while to talk to a customer service representative to ask for a limit increase. Given this, it's recommendable to ask in advance for a limit increase in more expensive and larger cases; otherwise, SageMaker will set the limit to zero by default.
  • Since the data has to be stored in S3 and copied to training, it doesn't allow to test and debug locally. Therefore, we have to wait a lot to check everything after every trail.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
  • Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Open Source
Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Open Source
I haven't had a need to contact support. However, all required help is out there in public forums.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
Microsoft Azure is better than Amazon Tensor Flow because it provides easier and pre-built capabilities such as Anomaly Detection, Recommendation, and Ranking. AWS is better than IBM Watson ML Studio because it has direct and prebuilt clustering capabilities AWS, like IBM Watson ML Studio, has powerful built-in algorithms, providing a stronger platform when comparing it with MS Azure ML Services and Google ML Engine.
Read full review
Open Source
With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better business decisions and save cost to the company. It stacks up better as we know Python is more widely used than R in the industry and can be learnt easily. Unlike PyCharm jupyter notebooks can be used to make documentations and exported in a variety of formats.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Positive: It has allowed us to work with our overseas teams without any large hardware investing.
  • Positive: Pre-trained models significantly reduce the time to develop solutions for our clients.
  • Negative: Since it's a relatively new tool, you have to be careful about not paying for large errors while learning to use the tool.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Positive impact: flexible implementation on any OS, for many common software languages
  • Positive impact: straightforward duplication for adaptation of workflows for other projects
  • Negative impact: sometimes encourages pigeonholing of data science work into notebooks versus extending code capability into software integration
Read full review
ScreenShots