Amicus Attorney by CARET vs. Thomson Reuters Firm Central

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amicus Attorney by CARET
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Amicus Attorney is a legal practice management platform which focuses on growth and business development, from AbacusNext in San Diego.
$49
Per User Per Month
Firm Central
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Thomson Reuters offers Firm Central, a law practice management, time management platform, and legal billing solution touting integration with Westlaw.N/A
Pricing
Amicus Attorney by CARETThomson Reuters Firm Central
Editions & Modules
Amicus Cloud
$49.00
Per User Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amicus Attorney by CARETFirm Central
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amicus Attorney by CARETThomson Reuters Firm Central
Top Pros
Top Cons
User Ratings
Amicus Attorney by CARETThomson Reuters Firm Central
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(3 ratings)
5.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amicus Attorney by CARETThomson Reuters Firm Central
Likelihood to Recommend
CARET (Abacus Data Systems, Inc. )
Amicus Attorney can probably be deployed very well in a law office that has a manager specifically dedicated to making it run smoothly, and who can keep track of the contacts, etc. In our firm, no one can spend the time to do this, so the information stored by Amicus gets a little disorganized, which has the effect of slowing us down
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
ease of use is a plus but client secure portal alerts need to be made more clearly so that communication flows both ways without delay
Read full review
Pros
CARET (Abacus Data Systems, Inc. )
  • Very efficient calendaring with sync to Outlook calendar (option of Exchange or Outlook level synchronization).
  • Case management including contacts, emails, documents, etc. to keep everything in one consolidated place.
  • Document automation including Word merging or HotDocs (third party). Take case data including custom pages and fields and instantly create documents based on templates with ease.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Time tracking.
  • Billing.
  • Easy access to Westlaw.
Read full review
Cons
CARET (Abacus Data Systems, Inc. )
  • Partner channel doesn't really exist anymore
  • Support of the product is extremely poor
  • License agreement states you can only run it in their data center (not Azure or AWS, really Amicus?)
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • ease of portal access
  • form bank being easier to modify
  • integrations with other programs
Read full review
Support Rating
CARET (Abacus Data Systems, Inc. )
No answers on this topic
Thomson Reuters
I have not had to use support
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CARET (Abacus Data Systems, Inc. )
In the time that I have been with my firm, we have not used any other comparable software. As a result I can't compare it to anything else that is out there
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
we actually switched to Clio for better document management and overall billing and accounting features which have worked out very well
Read full review
Return on Investment
CARET (Abacus Data Systems, Inc. )
  • Large software investment, if not properly configured and utilized this can be a time and money vacuum.
  • If law firm does not have a consistent personality among employees, buy-in may be difficult as it's a significant workflow change for users.
  • Can greatly benefit law firm if used properly and across board for all employees. Uniform data organization for cases and custom pages add to personalizing software for firm.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Tracking time was positive.
  • Cost us money to switch document management systems.
  • Loss of time/work product with document management functions.
Read full review
ScreenShots