Anaconda is an enterprise Python platform that provides access to open-source Python and R packages used in AI, data science, and machine learning. These enterprise-grade solutions are used by corporate, research, and academic institutions for competitive advantage and research.
$0
per month
GoodData.AI
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
GoodData is an analytics platform used by organizations to deliver real-time, governed insights, embedded into products, customized for users, and integrated into any data environment.
N/A
Pricing
Anaconda
GoodData.AI
Editions & Modules
Free Tier
$0
per month
Starter Tier
$15
per month per user
Business
$50
per month per user
Custom
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Anaconda
GoodData.AI
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
Users within organizations with 200+ employees/contractors (including Affiliates) require a paid Business license. Academic and non-profit research institutions may qualify for exemptions.
I am using both; when it comes to application deployment on the server, I use Docker, and sometimes, I use Docker with conda image for deployment when it comes to ML/DL apps.
There are several reasons why Anaconda is better to use for me including that it is much easier to use than Baycharm. Also, the user interface is not as complicated as that of Baycharm. Even Anaconda does not slow down my device, using PaySharm slowed down my device in an …
It provides several IDEs like Spyder and Jupiter that would be enough for me to write my Python script. You can easily install it on a Windows or Linux computer and supports many libraries.
In Anaconda, [it is easy] to find and install the required libraries. Here, we can work on multiple projects with different sets of the environment. [It is] easy to create the notebook for developing the ML model and deployment. Right now, it is the best data science version …
One of the main competitors to Anaconda can be Google products such as Colab. Colab gives you the flexibility to handle large datasets gives it an edge over Anaconda. But again, the ease of access and usability of Anaconda stacks up against Colab. Besides, Anaconda relies more …
It is almost dishonest to compare Anaconda with PyCharm as they do different things in their basic forms unless you spend a lot of time configuring plugins on your PyCharm environment. Anaconda has a lot of things ready and you just need to install your libs and dependencies.
Anaconda has features which overpowers it over the other analytical tools I have used. Also it provides multiple ways to reach to the solution, depending on the developers expertise. When I was a beginner at using Anaconda, since it is open source and the community using …
On top of all the software that I have used, Anaconda is the best because in Anaconda we have built-in packages that provide no headache to install packages and we can design a separate environment for different projects. Anaconda has versions made for special use cases. …
Some analyzed tools, such as Pycharm and Spyder, are simpler to use but still do not have all the libraries needed for those starting out in data science--or in institutions that need to grow in that direction. Anaconda is more robust but stable, more complete, and the …
If the project is not large scale then Jupiter notebooks or Visual Studio Code serve well. If you don't have any dependency on Python versions, these IDEs can be well suited for fast development and deployment.
Anaconda includes many standard data science packages where as the regular python installation does not. Depending on use case, some may feel Anaconda may be "bloated" For ease Anaconda is better, for minimizing extraneous package installation, the regular python installer is …
I know that Pycharm is a IDE and Anaconda is a distribution. However I use Anaconda largely due to Jupyter Notebook, which more or less does the same job as Pycharm. 1 year ago I decided to use Anaconda (Jupiyer Notebook) as it is easier to use it as a beginner(at least my …
MATLAB is more of a pay-as-you-go alternative, which not only does not use Python but is also more bloated and costly. MATLAB takes longer to install, setup, and configure for new users who may require specific packages - such as the Classification Learner (machine learning), …
Compare Anaconda to Unix coding system. You can use PIP to install and create requirement.txt to replace environment.yml to avoid using Anaconda. However, Anaconda is such an excellent tool to maintain your environment and check the version of your package and update the …
Anaconda is very strong in the environment and version control that make data science work much easier. The only thing that might be comparable to Anaconda would be using Kubernetes to control Docker. Another potential improvement would be replacing spyder with PyCharm and Atom …
Anaconda gives freedom to do anything with its packages, compared to other non-programming language-based softwares. It is almost possible to do anything with Anaconda. Anaconda brings ease of integrity because it is possible to integrate anything with a Python Py script, …
I prefer Anaconda due to the control I have at every level over the data and the visualizations. Power BI does a better job at guessing what graphics to use, but these usually aren't the most helpful. Anaconda and the slew of Python extensions that add incredible functionality, …
Other systems might be easier to set-up but Anaconda is a fairly flexible analytics toolkit. It can be configured in a way that truly matches the way in which your business or analytics department works. Built on top of lots of open source projects so things aren't siloed and …
We did our investigation years ago and I wasn't the one leading it but what I do remember was that GoodData had the best balance of price compared to infrastructure demand while not compromising on the power of available features around insight and dashboarding
GoodData is easier to understand and designed to detail critical data within a dashboard system. Visualization is essential, and the filters are quite varied. Metrics are also easy to use, so users only need to think a little more carefully about setting up the SQL required for …
Embedding flexibility was the main reason we chose GoodData. Interactivity, customization options, and programmatic ability were all very important to us and GoodData's embedding via React SDK offers exactly that. Implementation time was 50% shorter with GoodData than with …
GoodData seems less user friendly and doesn't provide that many visualization options so we are slowly moving to other solution in part of the company. There are still teams that plan to continue with GoodData and use React code in orther to supply missing functions.
I was not a part of the process to choose GoodData. From other teammates: the ability to really control the look of pixel perfect dashboards was important.
GoodData is much more customisable in our case so we choose this. Also when it comes to pricing part GoodData is the best economically as well and in terms of features and functionalities. As compared to others similar products I believe that GoodData is much more reliable with …
GoodData has been proven best for us as it has given the most accurate analytical insights on our data. I've used other tools too but no one has been this good in terms of reporting, handling data, decision making. Using GoodData for almost every organisational decision and …
GoodData comparing to other platform is very easy to use, customer support and on-boarding support. Set of features, speed of integration in our platform. Also great benefit for us was very competetive pricing.
All of the tools have their plusses and minuses. The one thing that stands out with Qlik is that it allows for two-way API integrations with Salesforce. This means that analytics reporting results can interact with the Salesforce application.
The primary reasons GoodData was selected was data modeling capability, ability to standardize complex metrics, quality of viaualization and multi-tenancy
GoodData cloud has been on an upward trend in terms of speed of improvements and new features. It is easier to maintain and mange than most other products in terms of the behind the scenes updates etc however the hosted nature of the dashboards does reduce the flexibility to …
GoodData provides the largest amount of OOB features that meet our end-user needs. It means a lot that we don't need to perform development on our own. At some point, it may make sense to take items in house, but its hte best current fit.
I have used all softwares in my past 10 years of experience. GoodData stands out with its seamless data integration, advanced predictive analytics, and collaborative features. Unlike Tableau and Power BI, GoodData offers scalable solutions with a user-friendly interface for …
Choosing between GoodData and other platforms was clear for me as the superiority of GoodData over others due to our needs. GoodData stands out for its awesome dashboards, robust predictive analytics, reports, and analysis. Data integration helps us for business intelligence …
Tableau is fantastic for visuals, and Zoho Analytics is user-friendly, but GoodData takes the cake with its seamless integration and powerful analytics. It stacks up well because it's not just about pretty graphs but it's about making data work for you. It's the perfect fit for …
GoodData is best among every other platform I used because it's a cloud based platform and way to easy to use. Its robust predictive analytics and unified data view set it way apart. While Power BI and Tableau excel in visualization, GoodData's focus on comprehensive business …
I have asked all my juniors to work with Anaconda and Pycharm only, as this is the best combination for now. Coming to use cases: 1. When you have multiple applications using multiple Python variants, it is a really good tool instead of Venv (I never like it). 2. If you have to work on multiple tools and you are someone who needs to work on data analytics, development, and machine learning, this is good. 3. If you have to work with both R and Python, then also this is a good tool, and it provides support for both.
If you have consistently formatted data, that you want regular reports on, plus flexibility to let end users build their own reports, GoodData is perfect. Especially if your end users are less technical. If you want to be able to embed your reporting into your app, GoodData excels, though the start up process can be involved. If your data structure varies, it could be more challenging to integrate. It may also not be worth the integration if you have people who can already run their own SQL queries.
Installing packages is very easy with Anaconda. Anaconda comes with 'anaconda navigator', a terminal-like utility from which you can easily install R packages and python libraries.
Launching R and python IDEs as well as Jupyter notebooks from anaconda navigator is simple, and Anaconda makes it very easy to keep these packages up-to-date.
I really like the fact that if you don't want to install the full version of Anaconda, you can opt to install a lightweight version (called Miniconda) that includes less python libraries and only core conda. I've installed it when I didn't want to take up as much disk space as Anaconda requires, but it works just the same.
GoodData helps in simplifying complex data into easy-to-understand visuals. We can create personalized dashboards & tailor them as per requirements. This data can be used from an executive level employee to a team lead employee in the business
GoodData is a very user friendly platform. The collaborative features simplify sharing and discussing reports among team members which promotes a culture of data-driven decision-making.
GoodData connects with various data sources and consolidate information from multiple platforms. This flexibility proves invaluable for businesses dealing with data spread across different systems as they can access large amount of data on a single platform.
It's really good at data processing, but needs to grow more in publishing in a way that a non-programmer can interact with. It also introduces confusion for programmers that are familiar with normal Python processes which are slightly different in Anaconda such as virtualenvs.
Because gooddata really helps us in processing data to make reports or dashboards. So we are very satisfied when we use it. What we like is the flexible use of charts. We change at will the use of charts to display in reports or dashboards. Thank you Gooddata for helping companies like us who need flexibility in usage
I am giving this rating because I have been using this tool since 2017, and I was in college at that time. Initially, I hesitated to use it as I was not very aware of the workings of Python and how difficult it is to manage its dependency from project to project. Anaconda really helped me with that. The first machine-learning model that I deployed on the Live server was with Anaconda only. It was so managed that I only installed libraries from the requirement.txt file, and it started working. There was no need to manually install cuda or tensor flow as it was a very difficult job at that time. Graphical data modeling also provides tools for it, and they can be easily saved to the system and used anywhere.
From my experience, overall usability of GoodData platform is great very easy to use, but there is still few features as GoodData platform and interface continuosly evolves, which are not yet available within user interface, but only available via API. For regular users all main and key features and tools are perfect, well defined and very easy to use.
Anaconda provides fast support, and a large number of users moderate its online community. This enables any questions you may have to be answered in a timely fashion, regardless of the topic. The fact that it is based in a Python environment only adds to the size of the online community.
The fast and comprehensive responses we got from GoodData regarding the doubts we had experienced while starting to use the products and metrics were of great help in ensuring the metrics we were obtaining were accurate to what we wanted to know about our customers' experience and our product areas of opportunity.
Implementations are hard and we had limited technical resources. We relied too heavily on GD care team. When we found technical gaps, they weren't simple to overcome
One of the main competitors to Anaconda can be Google products such as Colab. Colab gives you the flexibility to handle large datasets gives it an edge over Anaconda. But again, the ease of access and usability of Anaconda stacks up against Colab. Besides, Anaconda relies more on your machine which makes it safe to use.
We did our investigation years ago and I wasn't the one leading it but what I do remember was that GoodData had the best balance of price compared to infrastructure demand while not compromising on the power of available features around insight and dashboarding
Positive impact - Multiple options for data presenting , visualizing and sharing. (Eg: R-Markdown).
Positive impact - Ease of access to build complex machine learning models. (I work in NLP, it has multiple built in models to analyze the various contexts).
Positive impact - Conda package let's to deal with external packages which can be used in Jupyter.