Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Camel
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Apache Camel is an open source integration platform.N/A
Mule ESB
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Mule ESB, from Mulesoft, is an open source middleware solution.N/A
Pega Platform
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Pega Platform is a combined business process management and robotic process automation (RPA) platform with advanced workforce analytics from Pegasystems.
$35
per month per user* (or $0.45 per case**)
Pricing
Apache CamelMule ESBPega Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Low-code Factory Edition
$35
per month per user* (or $0.45 per case**)
Standard Edition
$90
per month per user* (or $0.80 per case**)
Enterprise Edition
Custom Quote
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache CamelMule ESBPega Platform
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details*500 named user minimum. Additional users available in blocks of 100. Billed annually. Based on a 3-year term. **350,000 cases / year minimum. Additional cases available in blocks of 150,000.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache CamelMule ESBPega Platform
Considered Multiple Products
Apache Camel

No answer on this topic

Mule ESB
Chose Mule ESB
It doesn't have API . We have to go for another API manager. But in Mule, it has both API manager and ESB
Pega Platform
Features
Apache CamelMule ESBPega Platform
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Apache Camel
-
Ratings
Mule ESB
-
Ratings
Pega Platform
5.3
63 Ratings
38% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings00 Ratings4.062 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings00 Ratings6.062 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings00 Ratings6.061 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Apache Camel
-
Ratings
Mule ESB
-
Ratings
Pega Platform
8.0
66 Ratings
4% below category average
Process designer00 Ratings00 Ratings8.965 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings00 Ratings7.757 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings00 Ratings9.965 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings00 Ratings7.351 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings00 Ratings7.048 Ratings
Support for modeling languages00 Ratings00 Ratings5.46 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings00 Ratings9.059 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings00 Ratings8.656 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Apache Camel
-
Ratings
Mule ESB
-
Ratings
Pega Platform
9.0
50 Ratings
7% above category average
Social collaboration tools00 Ratings00 Ratings9.050 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Apache Camel
-
Ratings
Mule ESB
-
Ratings
Pega Platform
4.4
9 Ratings
59% below category average
Content management00 Ratings00 Ratings4.49 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache CamelMule ESBPega Platform
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Boomi
Boomi
Score 7.9 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 7.8 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
Score 8.0 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 7.8 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache CamelMule ESBPega Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(11 ratings)
9.8
(5 ratings)
6.0
(73 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(7 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(7 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache CamelMule ESBPega Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Message brokering across different systems, with transactionality and the ability to have fine tuned control over what happens using Java (or other languages), instead of a heavy, proprietary languages. One situation that it doesn't fit very well (as far as I have experienced) is when your workflow requires significant data mapping. While possible when using Java tooling, some other visual data mapping tools in other integration frameworks are easier to work with.
Read full review
Salesforce
If you’re bringing anything into Salesforce you should just invest now into Mule, you will get your money’s worth and find a myriad of uses to build APIs between many other systems. Once you build a component you can easily reuse it as a building block to attach to another source/destination. This makes it easy to ramp up quickly and spread usage of Mule throughout your enterprise. A good value for medium to large companies, but probably cheaper to outsource your job to a consulting firm if you are smaller.
Read full review
Pegasystems
Pega Platform has introduced the low code feature, using app studio seasonal and professional developer can develop application easily and quickly. The initial application can be build by Business analyst and product owner who has less knowledge of Pega Platform, further application can be enhanced/extended by professional developer. We can develop end to end application and promote to higher environment. Easily we can perform parallel development using branch.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Camel has an easy learning curve. It is fairly well documented and there are about 5-6 books on Camel.
  • There is a large user group and blogs devoted to all things Camel and the developers of Camel provide quick answers and have also been very quick to patch Camel, when bugs are reported.
  • Camel integrates well with well known frameworks like Spring, and other middleware products like Apache Karaf and Servicemix.
  • There are over 150 components for the Camel framework that help integrate with diverse software platforms.
  • Camel is also good for creating microservices.
Read full review
Salesforce
  • It is best suited for Rest API development. Mule ESB uses RAML as an API descriptor which is less complex and easy to understand. RAML is an open standard majorly supported by Mulesoft. Once RAML is developed, it is very easy (a few clicks)to create flows corresponding to the resources defined in the RAML. One can also include JSON schema validation in RAML, and with the use of APIkit router, Mule ESB makes the request validation very easy (it's automatic basically.)
  • Mule ESB comes with a large spectrum of community and enterprise connectors. We have connectors for all the major platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Salesforce, SAP, etc. This enables Mule ESB to integrate with the other systems in a faster and more robust way. Mule ESB has many components to fulfill the requirements of each integration (for example batch processing, parallel processing, choice, etc.)
  • Mule API gateway is one of the best tools (modules) of Mulesoft's offering. It supports API governance and management very well. One can easily enforce policies on their APIs with API gateway. It enables some of the must-have features in an API solution (i.e. throttling, oAuth, access levels, etc.)
  • Implementing a CI/CD (DevOps) environment for Mule ESB is a very easy task. Mule majorly uses MAVEN as its build tool, which in turn makes it best suitable for CI/CD approach. Mule also provides MAVEN plugins for auto deployments to the servers. Mule also has a best Unit testing module which is MUnit. MUnit can be used for both Unit and Functional testing, and it is easy to write and generates coverage reports in various formats.
Read full review
Pegasystems
  • Quick development time. Much of the Pega "rules" are easy to configure and implement.
  • Visually friendly and modern. Much of the UI/UX elements in the system are continuously supported and updated, giving a nice feel to the apps.
  • Many of the configurations and rules Pega gives to the developers can also be delegated to business users. The organization and structure of the client's business can easily be adapted in the Pega platform.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • didn't work well when our developers tried to transform heavy data sets
  • Apache Camel's whole logic is based on java so team needs to have a great skill set in java
  • if there are a handful of workflows then Apache Camel's full potential can't be realized
Read full review
Salesforce
  • Make sure to not over-engineer shared components. It can complicate development
  • Create a roadmap for where you are going - if not, you may miss components
  • I suggest getting support, otherwise it could be a difficult learning curve
Read full review
Pegasystems
  • Need more learning materials. For Beginners who have previous programming experience with another language takes more time to learn.
  • If the developer is met with an issue in pega platform , they have to rely on Pega supporting team to fix it.
  • Customization is available but is not encouraged. Pega does not support faults that occur in customized solutions.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apache
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
Pegasystems
Pegasystems has continued to demonstrate a strong partnership with our organization and investment in their product that aligns with our overall vision and need. Pegasystems has engaged us at every level, with the assistance of minor defects to the overall roadmap planning and alignment of our goals
Read full review
Usability
Apache
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
Pegasystems
Pega Platform is enhancing its product and launching new features day by day which help to achieve customers needs. If I talk about the earlier version of Pega Platform (i.e. pega v5 and 6.3) there were many numbers of limitations in Pega Platform and if we need to do some customization then needed to write custom java and jave scripts to achieve the functionally. Now I can say Pega Platform is running with market trends and demand. Pega Platform is giving all the options which support the current technologies like decisioning capabilities, real time processing, mashup, process fabrics etc..
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
Pegasystems
It’s very slow sometimes, but that may be our servers. Also the Knowledge Library needs some work - again, not sure if it’s our setup or what- but I’m unable to search the body of an article for content, so I have to be very intentional with tagging, but it’s not ideal.
Read full review
Online Training
Apache
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
Pegasystems
The online training is an excellent one, but still it is missing hands on development.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
Pegasystems
Implementation is totally depend up on the requirement
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
If you are looking for a Java-based open source low cost equivalent to webMethods or Azure Logic Apps, Apache Camel is an excellent choice as it is mature and widely deployed, and included in many vendored Java application servers too such as Redhat JBoss EAP. Apache Camel is lacking on the GUI tooling side compared to commercial products such as webMethods or Azure Logic Apps.
Read full review
Salesforce
It doesn't have API . We have to go for another API manager. But in Mule, it has both API manager and ESB
Read full review
Pegasystems
We did evaluate multiple products offerings with Pega Platform capabilities and observed that Pega PRPC rules engine and case management capabilities are better over so many BPM Tools. We also conducted a detailed study with developers to identify the best products out of Suite of BPM products. It's observed that Rules engines integration is very streamlined with forms in Pega whereas other tools multiple have powerful data model capabilities but lacks the ease of creating business rules.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Very fast time to market in that so many components are available to use immediately.
  • Error handling mechanisms and patterns of practice are robust and easy to use which in turn has made our application more robust from the start, so fewer bugs.
  • However, testing and debugging routes is more challenging than working is standard Java so that takes more time (less time than writing the components from scratch).
  • Most people don't know Camel coming in and many junior developers find it overwhelming and are not enthusiastic to learn it. So finding people that want to develop/maintain it is a challenge.
Read full review
Salesforce
  • Overall a great tool for complex integrations
Read full review
Pegasystems
  • For one of the applications we worked on, we were able to reduce the processing time on a case from 2 days to 20 minutes by utilizing Pega
  • We were able to resolve the issue of the routing of cases to users based on a specific algorithm by use of Pega
  • Pega case management feature was extensively used in one of the application to establish a parent-child relationship which was very helpful for all the business users
Read full review
ScreenShots