Apache Camel is an open source integration platform.
N/A
OpenText MBPM
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired BPM solution Metastorm in 2011, and has rebranded the product as OpenText MBPM. It is an alternative BPM solution to OpenText's primary BPM offering called OpenText Cordys Business Process Management.
N/A
Pricing
Apache Camel
OpenText MBPM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache Camel
OpenText MBPM
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache Camel
OpenText MBPM
Features
Apache Camel
OpenText MBPM
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Apache Camel
-
Ratings
OpenText MBPM
7.0
3 Ratings
13% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
7.93 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
4.03 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Apache Camel
-
Ratings
OpenText MBPM
7.3
3 Ratings
13% below category average
Process designer
00 Ratings
8.13 Ratings
Process simulation
00 Ratings
7.13 Ratings
Business rules engine
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
SOA support
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Process player
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Support for modeling languages
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Form builder
00 Ratings
6.93 Ratings
Model execution
00 Ratings
6.13 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Apache Camel
-
Ratings
OpenText MBPM
7.6
3 Ratings
10% below category average
Social collaboration tools
00 Ratings
7.63 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Message brokering across different systems, with transactionality and the ability to have fine tuned control over what happens using Java (or other languages), instead of a heavy, proprietary languages. One situation that it doesn't fit very well (as far as I have experienced) is when your workflow requires significant data mapping. While possible when using Java tooling, some other visual data mapping tools in other integration frameworks are easier to work with.
Metastorm is well-suited for scenarios in which internal stress testing an application is needed in a hurry before showcasing it to potential customers. It supports different views of the process from Swimlane perspective, so different methodologies can be handled. It is an Enterprise level tool and handles both small and large projects quite well, although smaller companies may be stressed out by the amount of time it takes to properly maintain the application.
Camel has an easy learning curve. It is fairly well documented and there are about 5-6 books on Camel.
There is a large user group and blogs devoted to all things Camel and the developers of Camel provide quick answers and have also been very quick to patch Camel, when bugs are reported.
Camel integrates well with well known frameworks like Spring, and other middleware products like Apache Karaf and Servicemix.
There are over 150 components for the Camel framework that help integrate with diverse software platforms.
The Metastorm process engine is based on an older version of .NET. Updating to a newer version would resolve several known issues with .NET email functionality.
Metastorm builds web pages at run time. While the UI presented to the end user is fine, the Document Object Model is convoluted and subject to change with new releases. Providing a more simplified DOM or at very least a custom function to replace document.getElementById() would make client-side scripting a much more powerful tool.
One function that I've seen Metastorm competitors do well, is email wizards. Having a WYSIWYG email editor would be really nice.
If you are looking for a Java-based open source low cost equivalent to webMethods or Azure Logic Apps, Apache Camel is an excellent choice as it is mature and widely deployed, and included in many vendored Java application servers too such as Redhat JBoss EAP. Apache Camel is lacking on the GUI tooling side compared to commercial products such as webMethods or Azure Logic Apps.
We found that OpenText MBPM held its own quite well against IBM BPM. We ended up choosing OpenText MBPM due to the analytics, complex routing, and the ease of SOA service integration. Furthermore, the ability to quickly develop simple User interfaces make this tool a daily component of our most-used toolbox components.
Very fast time to market in that so many components are available to use immediately.
Error handling mechanisms and patterns of practice are robust and easy to use which in turn has made our application more robust from the start, so fewer bugs.
However, testing and debugging routes is more challenging than working is standard Java so that takes more time (less time than writing the components from scratch).
Most people don't know Camel coming in and many junior developers find it overwhelming and are not enthusiastic to learn it. So finding people that want to develop/maintain it is a challenge.