TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    JMeter

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AJMeter, from Apache, is a load and performance testing tool.

    $0

    Postman

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/APostman, headquartered in San Francisco, offers their flagship API development and management free to small teams and independent developers. Higher tiers (Postman Pro and Postman Enterprise) support API management, as well as team collaboration, extended support and other advanced features.

    $0

    ReadyAPI

    Score6.1 out of 10
    N/AReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro) is a REST and SOAP API functional testing tool that enables software developers, QA engineers, and manual testers to work together to create, maintain, and execute complex end-to-end API tests in their CI/CD pipelines without needing to code.N/A
    Pricing
    JMeterPostmanReadyAPI
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Postman Free Plan
    $0.00 US Dollars
    Postman Basic Plan
    $12 US Dollars
    per month per user
    Postman Professional Plan
    $29 US Dollars
    per month per user
    Postman Enterprise Plan
    $99 US Dollars
    per month per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    JMeterPostmanReadyAPI
    Free Trial
    NoNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—1. Postman Free plan: Start designing, developing, and testing APIs at no cost for teams of up to three people. 2. Postman Basic plan: Collaborate with your team to design, develop, and test APIs faster; $12/month per user, billed annually 3. Postman Professional plan: Centrally manage the entire API workflow; $29/month per user, billed annually 4. Postman Enterprise plan: Securely manage, organize, and accelerate API-first development at scale; $99/month per user, billed annually—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    JMeterPostmanReadyAPI
    Considered Multiple Products
    Apache
    Chose JMeter
    Postman is really more about API testing, and was never aimed at performance/monitoring the way Apache JMeter does. If you find someone trying to use Postman this way... show them the way!
    Incentivized
    Chose JMeter
    Best open-source performance testing tool. JMeter has no alternative for performance testing. It is really easy to record and enhance scripts using this tool. It provides lots of free plugins which gives us much flexibility. It can be executed using GUI or non-GUI. Good tool …
    Incentivized
    Chose JMeter
    It's very easy GUI helps the tester to perform various testing scenarios. Easy to configure test cases and modules which has proper and well-maintained documentation. Its an excellent tool for performance testing and running a variety of load tests, stress tests, and longevity …
    Incentivized
    Chose JMeter
    The recorder provided by JMeter is ok and if your team has no idea about programming you can use it to test your web apps without writing any code.
    Incentivized
    Chose JMeter
    SOAP UI and LoadRunner
    Incentivized
    Chose JMeter
    Both tools are great, but JMeter allows for better performance/load testing, scalability, and is free.
    Postman
    Chose Postman
    Postman stands out for its ease of use, collaboration features, automation support, and rich ecosystem, making it more powerful and user friendly interface . It has modern tools which perform the functions quilckly while Apache JMeter has old UI tools which is good for loading …
    Incentivized
    Chose Postman
    There isn't much between them, really we just picked Postman as it was slightly better but the others are still good. We also had a few people that had a good experience of using Postman join the team when we were looking at what tools to use and with them using Postman before …
    Incentivized
    Chose Postman
    Sharing across teams is very robust in Postman than SoapUI.
    Adding APIs/ managing collections is very user friendly in Postman.
    Incentivized
    Chose Postman
    ReadyAPI is a nightmare for source control integration but gives you a huge plethora more tools to create automated tests for APIs. With Visual Studio you can use a unit test framework to create test cases that can instantiate a WebClient class and make API calls. It takes …
    Incentivized
    Chose Postman
    I did not use SoapUI and can't compare them. But, Postman gave results my team needed, that's why we did not test any other software. Runs simple, gives instant and exact results.
    Incentivized
    Chose Postman
    Postman is a great out-of-the-box tool for API testing. SwaggerHub is also good but requires a bit more configuration to integrate with the API you're going to test (if the API isn't set up for it, you probably won't get much out of SwaggerHub).
    Incentivized
    Chose Postman
    Postman has pros and cons both and keeping them in mind we are using multiple tools to leverage our Services, integration, automation, and testing needs.
    Some of the above mentioned tools have better automation or complete framework implementation capabilities. Having all the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Postman
    Postman is lightweight, easy to use and uses fewer computer resources. It has all the functionalities that our organization needs.
    Incentivized
    Chose Postman
    Postman has a very easy interface to build your requests, it is better than others in every aspect of API development.
    Incentivized
    Chose Postman
    Postman is a much easier UI/tool to use than some of the heavyweight tools out there. It provides a simple and elegant solution to quickly build and develop projects for testing and development. While other tools have more features, those features are not used from day to day …
    Incentivized
    Chose Postman
    Non listed products to compare against include Insomnia, Paw, HTTPie, and ARC. We selected Postman because of its tech support, ease-of-use, and popularity. We wanted an API testing software that we could easily set up and integrate with tools like Jenkins for our build …
    Incentivized
    Chose Postman
    I also use SoapUI for testing and debugging but SoapUI uses lots of memory and processor space. That's why I mostly use Postman and for WDSL services I use SoapUI. If in the future we going to purchase any one of them we would recommend Postman because Postman is cheaper than So…
    Incentivized
    SmartBear
    Chose ReadyAPI
    ReadyAPI manages DataSources, Endpoints, and Environments much better than Postman. Postman is a little simpler implementation but has a Team Workspace that is powerful for Development handoffs and manual testing.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    Postman is simpler and super less expensive than ReadyAPI. In addition, the product continues to work even after the license has expired in comparison to ReadyAPI which requires you to purchase a new license every time. Is a turnoff.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    Postman didn't have the flexibility of detailed assertions that we needed, although it was easy to use. Also their integration points weren't as straightforward.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    Postman!
    ReadyAPI's data generator feature is the reason behind choosing it against other products.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    The main competitor for ReadyAPI was Postman. It is much more lightweight, but that means you also get fewer features.
    ReadyAPI also provides an ecosystem in which you can have an entire lifecycle for your API, if that is what you want - and are willing to put in the work to …
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    I didn't have much experience with automation in Postman, but ReadyAPI seems more robust and in my opinion is able to cover many use cases. For me it was also easier to write the tests in SoapUI as many times it is matter of clicking and copying existing things.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    Automating test cases is not functional in Postman, but in ReadyAPI you can do everything, even keyword driven development.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    ReadyAPI provides intuitive GUI capabilities compared to their own open source product.

    When compared to Postman, ReadyAPI also supports SOAP based services, which is a saver especially when integrating with legacy or other third party systems.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    ReadyAPI vs Postman: ReadyAPI makes testing WSDL, SOAP, etc. much easier and quicker. Postman would require you to manually construct the SOAP envelopes and metadata XML, which is a lot of work for something that is meant to be a quick test.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    We have considered only Postman as an alternate option and ended up with Ready PI for its in built features like reporting and easy maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    Our team did an extensive analysis of the products that were available to carry out API Testing. There were 3 products that were finalized, SoapUI Pro, Postman, and Katalon Studio, out of these 3 SoapUI was the clear winner. I can't stress enough about the SoapUI's UI …
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    ReadyAPI stands out among all these tools except for the fact that it is a paid tool.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    Each product has a different specialty. With ReadyAPI, it combines multiple specialties into one product and also allows a combination of other products within the Smartbear suite. With other products integration of multiple test, products are far more difficult and require …
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    I have used a couple of products mentioned above. But the best thing about ReadyAPI is, it's a complete [package] for API testing. Not all software offers load testing, assertion, and reporting features. Also, lots of plugins, like Azure API Management, AWS API plugin features …
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    ReadyAPI beats all other alternatives because of its support of all kinds of API types. Also, users can specify every flow and every step for every second to replicate every test case with ease. It also has GIT support with is a big plus.

    ReadyAPI is must have tool for API …
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    1. Less coding.
    2. Easy to use.
    3. Even people with less experience in coding can use it.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    I am using ReadyAPI tools for more than two years helped us to evaluate the quality of our API. For all API Automation testing, load testing, and security testing ReadyAPI bring us the best result and quality. It has many useful features in automation that we use to do more …
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    I have not used other API testing products but I am completely satisfied with the functionality and performance of ReadyAPI. It covers all required API protocols and database connections that are used in our organization. It also allows extending the functionality by adding …
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    It has many features including functional security testing. And it's known to be widely used.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    We selected SoapUI because it generates tests easily using drag and drop, and point-and-click. It gives powerful data-driven testing with data from files and databases. Scripts can be reused easily.
    We had an extra option to integrate it directly with our build tool, Jenkins, …
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    It is robust and automated. It is a club of all the tools that are quite useful in every phase of the development life cycle.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    Great premium features. Community support. Support for groovy script for extending the existing SoapUI functionality. Load testing support.
    Incentivized
    Chose ReadyAPI
    SoapUI is more complete in every way, it facilitates the user's work and allows managing all the SOAP and REST requests that are needed in a more organized way.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    97%
    Would buy again
    29 Answers
    93%
    Would buy again
    28 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    29 Answers
    89%
    Delivers good value for the price
    24 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    30 Answers
    97%
    Happy with the feature set
    29 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    91%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    20 Answers
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    26 Answers
    92%
    Implementation went as expected
    22 Answers
    Features
    JMeterPostmanReadyAPI
    Load Testing
    Comparison of Load Testing features of Apache JMeter and Postman and ReadyAPI
    Feature
    Apache JMeter
    7.2
    24 Ratings
    17% below category average
    Postman
    -
    Ratings
    ReadyAPI
    -
    Ratings
    End to end performance management9.021 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrated performance data8.522 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility7.521 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Real time monitoring6.521 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated anomaly detection4.417 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    API Management
    Comparison of API Management features of Apache JMeter and Postman and ReadyAPI
    Feature
    Apache JMeter
    -
    Ratings
    Postman
    8.2
    40 Ratings
    3% below category average
    ReadyAPI
    -
    Ratings
    API access control00 Ratings9.337 Ratings00 Ratings
    Rate limits and usage policies00 Ratings7.118 Ratings00 Ratings
    API usage data00 Ratings8.117 Ratings00 Ratings
    API user onboarding00 Ratings8.321 Ratings00 Ratings
    API versioning00 Ratings8.229 Ratings00 Ratings
    Usage billing and payments00 Ratings7.816 Ratings00 Ratings
    API monitoring and logging00 Ratings8.136 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    JMeterPostmanReadyAPI
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon API Gateway
    Score7.3 out of 10
    TestComplete
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Azure API Management
    Score9.1 out of 10
    OpenText UFT One
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    LoadRunner Professional
    Score8.5 out of 10
    OCI API Management
    Score7.9 out of 10
    SoapUI Open Source
    Score8.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    JMeterPostmanReadyAPI
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (39 ratings)
    8.5
    (44 ratings)
    7.0
    (65 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.6
    (12 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (18 ratings)
    Usability
    6.5
    (3 ratings)
    8.6
    (8 ratings)
    9.9
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.1
    (11 ratings)
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    Online Training
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    JMeterPostmanReadyAPI
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    JMeter is well suited for Java applications where the user can script the scenario once and make changes to accommodate for as many numbers of users for load test execution. The image and selection of any files or exporting files scenario is handled well.
    It is less appropriate to test Ajax applications where it is required to script click per use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Postman
    Postman is good for organising your API credentials, vendor settings, environments etc. It's also a good way of getting stared with APIs as you get to use a GUI which can help you understand what we mean by a 'body' or 'bearer token'. I think people generally gravitate towards GUI tools for getting started in a new technology area.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    As stated, we do a LOT of API testing, the swaggerhub import makes it easy to add APIs. This is very well-suited, as well as easy management of the steps/cases/suites inside of ReadyAPI. The one thing I do wish ReadyAPI was better suited for is changes to data, we have a lot of test cases in ReadyAPI and if we make a change to how the backend data is structured, one-by-one adjustments need to be made to the steps. Less appropriate, UI testing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • Easy of use - in generate load like HTTP requests, and processing/analyzing the responses. No coding is necessary at the basic level, just need to understand load testing and the infrastructure being tested.
    • Automatic management of things like cookies to help with session state support - so you don't specifically have to worry about it or handle it
    • Lots of testing/configuration options to suit your needs in making the right load generation (sampling requests), and analyzing the results, including any pre and post processing of the results first. Things like the Beanshell/BSF pre/post processors, response assertion, regular expression extractor, XPath extractor, CSV data set config
    • There is a JMeter cloud service called BlazeMeter that I think would be useful for those that need to scale up high load without provisioning their own systems. I've not personally tried it though, but I recently attended a meetup presentation that highlighted nice useful features that BlazeMeter provides. One should evaluate the service if they are considering JMeter and need to expand beyond existing hardware resources.
    Read full review
    Postman
    • It has opened a door for me to explore more out of it, as it is associated with so many APIs that I never felt any difficulty in finding the right API template, which are well organized and easily available.
    • It is very secure to use and provides great services which are user-friendly.
    • Due to this software I have got rid of the excessive emails and the slack channels, Now I am using my own private API and even it give me an option to produce my personal Postman’s API Builder from its Private API Network and this features has shared my excessive workload.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Ease of use (ability to automatically import API definitions, Jenkins integration for running in the pipeline).
    • Detailed test reports (allow to easily identify weak spots during both functional and performance testing).
    • One platform for all tests (allows to closely couple and reuse existent tests).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • Jmeter requires many tweaks with respect to its configuration file and thread properties. users need to edit theses files themselves. There could be some interface where we can edit this fields.
    • Jmeter cannot handle more threads and hangs up when we increase the number of threads. This causes lot of inconvenience. In these situations, user can be notified that such change would be lead to slow performance so that user can do as required. The same appears when we try to view huge files on graph listener.
    • Jmeter should optimize the read and write access to output csv since it acts as overhead to the I/O performance. This affects our test results for the application which we are testing.
    Read full review
    Postman
    • Wherever you need to automate tests that involve database verification or rely on data from databases, Postman is less suitable.
    • Postman's disc usage is extremely high, and it occasionally causes the computer to fade.
    • It doesn't have the ability to generate random data. To achieve randomness in my tests, I've been working around scripts.
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Needs good documentation
    • Need to improve the performance of the tool
    • Setup is very complex and for such [a] commercial tool, it should easy and straightforward
    • Tool says it supports security testing but in reality, it is not at an extensive level.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Apache
    Price, Wiki and user sharing. Having access to the information provided by the developers and other open source providers is key for me. The ability to share information and get answers directly is very important to success in software testing. And the price of this product currently is amazing. Too many companies charge way too much money for products that are far behind in their value and pertinence
    Read full review
    Postman
    No answers on this topic
    SmartBear
    The only reason this isn't a '10' is because of the cost. This product is definitely meant for organizations who are serious about making sure they invest in the full ecosystem of API design, development, maintenance. But there is a significant cost associated with this investment. and because of this cost (and the non-tangible output for executives), it is a difficult line-item to justify in this post-pandemic environment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Apache
    The purpose related to performance and load testing through Apache JMeter works fine but the usability of the tool should be improved quite a lot. If someone starts with the Jmeter fresh without prior experience, they need to put more efforts in understanding the tool. The UI is not that great which is the main reason not to give high rating on usability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Postman
    1. Friendly user friendly - when I started using Postman, I was a beginner to the API world, and it gave me a friendly view to begin its usage 2. Postman offers many features, including API testing, monitoring, documentation, and mock servers 3. Environment variables simplify testing across multiple environments (dev, prod) without repetitive configuration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    SoapUI allows us to combine multiple tests and adhere
    to the sequence that they need to run in order to complete successfully.
    It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
    good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    Postman
    No answers on this topic
    SmartBear
    Soap UI has managed to continuously build on it's solid foundation and keep improving by each release. It is by far the most dependable and accurate testing tool out there of its kind. Available via connecting to VM's created as SoapUI test machines give access to it anytime, anywhere practically.
    Read full review
    Performance
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    Postman
    No answers on this topic
    SmartBear
    It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
    good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Apache
    I have been using JMeter for the last year. By using this tool, you can make sure the system will work under varied loads. It helps us to simulate real time scenarios by creating required virtual users and make sure the application will work under load. Perform load, stress, and stability testing using JMeter.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Postman
    There is a lot of in-depth documentation for Postman available online, including detailed guides with screenshots and videos. They provide example APIs for new users to explore while learning how to use the tool. Generally, bugs in the client are quickly addressed through frequent free updates. Community and professional support options are available - most of the time, the free/community level support is adequate
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    To be honest, we didnt had much issues with the support, as there is already plenty of online communities available for help. But if ever there were some minor issues with the membership or the certificates, the tech support was always quick and efficient enough to resolve the issue ASAP
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    Postman
    No answers on this topic
    SmartBear
    no very easy but lacks documentation
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    I have used LoadRunner and Silkperformer, and so far Jmeter turns out be the easiest to use of all these. While each of them have their own ROI, Jmeter can be picked by anyone in hours and start testing within a day. While with other tools, we need to get license, install them (takes a while) and setup tests and firewalls, etc.
    Read full review
    Postman
    Previous to using Postman, I would either use browser tools directly, or write an in-house tool to send requests. Postman eliminates that need while providing a much better experience and more features. At the base level, Postman is as simple as typing in the address as you would in a browser. Authentication can be provided simply as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    ReadyAPI provides intuitive GUI capabilities compared to their own open source product. When compared to Postman, ReadyAPI also supports SOAP based services, which is a saver especially when integrating with legacy or other third party systems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    Postman
    No answers on this topic
    SmartBear
    It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
    good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing. However, I have read that added monitoring tools have been added, which if so the 7 could possibly go to a 8 or 9.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • Good ROI on improving the performance of the application.
    • Finding issues in the performance.
    • Benchmark the performance results.
    • CON: Need skillset to create and maintain the scripts in Java.
    • Scripts are reusable and it is executed by any user.
    • Need Client and Server setup to execute the scripts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Postman
    • Postman is free (although there's a paid tier that offers more features) so using it for testing APIs comes with little to no risk (besides learning curve).
    • The learning curve is a little steep for non-developer users, but developers should find it easy to pick up and use right out of the box, so to speak.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SmartBear
    • Very quick regression testing, hence having the testing results very soon, even the same day of deployment
    • for same above reason, it can save money for corporation (so no tedious, costly and erroneous manual testings)
    • The test reports are compatible with TestNG, so the corporation can integrate the reports in our Autamation frameworks such as Allure or Jira Zephyr
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Postman Screenshots

    Screenshot of API design - You can design your API specifications in Postman using OpenAPI, RAML, GraphQL, or SOAP formats. Postman’s schema editor makes it easy to work with specification files of any size, & it validates specifications with a built-in linting engine.Screenshot of API documentation - Postman automatically generates documentation & supports markdown-enabled and machine-readable documentation. Docs automatically include request details & sample code. Share the docs with your team, in a public workspace, or in a dedicated portal.Screenshot of API testing - Build and run functional, integration, & regression tests directly in Postman or as part of your CI/CD pipeline with Newman (Postman’s a command-line Collection Runner that enables you to run & test a collection from the command line).Screenshot of Public workspaces - Public workspaces allow you to share your APIs publicly with anyone. You can use public workspaces to gather feedback on your APIs, onboard developers quickly, or just showcase your work.Screenshot of Reporting - Postman generates reports that enable you to visualize data for team metrics and usage, & for API activities such as creation, collection execution, and test runs. Use reports to get insights on performance, troubleshooting, & SLA adherence.