Apache Kafka vs. Microsoft Power BI

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Kafka
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Apache Kafka is an open-source stream processing platform developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala and Java. The Kafka event streaming platform is used by thousands of companies for high-performance data pipelines, streaming analytics, data integration, and mission-critical applications.N/A
Microsoft Power BI
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Power BI is a visualization and data discovery tool from Microsoft. It allows users to convert data into visuals and graphics, visually explore and analyze data, collaborate on interactive dashboards and reports, and scale across their organization with built-in governance and security.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Apache KafkaMicrosoft Power BI
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache KafkaMicrosoft Power BI
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache KafkaMicrosoft Power BI
Features
Apache KafkaMicrosoft Power BI
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Apache Kafka
-
Ratings
Microsoft Power BI
8.4
193 Ratings
3% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.3164 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.8192 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings8.0175 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Apache Kafka
-
Ratings
Microsoft Power BI
7.9
191 Ratings
2% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.2188 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings7.7188 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.3140 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.5186 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Apache Kafka
-
Ratings
Microsoft Power BI
8.1
184 Ratings
2% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings8.3174 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.2169 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings7.7141 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.3144 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings7.9107 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Apache Kafka
-
Ratings
Microsoft Power BI
7.8
184 Ratings
2% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings8.2178 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.1163 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings7.4133 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings7.434 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Apache Kafka
-
Ratings
Microsoft Power BI
8.6
175 Ratings
1% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.8165 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.5143 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.4155 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.444 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.7137 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Apache Kafka
-
Ratings
Microsoft Power BI
8.0
157 Ratings
2% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings7.8147 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings7.7128 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings8.0150 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
Apache Kafka
-
Ratings
Microsoft Power BI
7.8
113 Ratings
1% above category average
REST API00 Ratings8.2101 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings7.682 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings8.055 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings6.967 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings7.588 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings8.444 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache KafkaMicrosoft Power BI
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Score 9.2 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Score 9.2 out of 10
Kyvos Insights
Kyvos Insights
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache KafkaMicrosoft Power BI
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(19 ratings)
8.5
(195 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(2 ratings)
9.5
(3 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(2 ratings)
8.3
(111 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(4 ratings)
9.8
(52 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache KafkaMicrosoft Power BI
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Apache Kafka is well-suited for most data-streaming use cases. Amazon Kinesis and Azure EventHubs, unless you have a specific use case where using those cloud PaAS for your data lakes, once set up well, Apache Kafka will take care of everything else in the background. Azure EventHubs, is good for cross-cloud use cases, and Amazon Kinesis - I have no real-world experience. But I believe it is the same.
Read full review
Microsoft
Has significantly improved collation of data and visualisation especially with business across Europe. Has given me the ability to see the Site availability at the click of a button to see which Site is in the "money" and seize opportunities based on Market data
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Really easy to configure. I've used other message brokers such as RabbitMQ and compared to them, Kafka's configurations are very easy to understand and tweak.
  • Very scalable: easily configured to run on multiple nodes allowing for ease of parallelism (assuming your queues/topics don't have to be consumed in the exact same order the messages were delivered)
  • Not exactly a feature, but I trust Kafka will be around for at least another decade because active development has continued to be strong and there's a lot of financial backing from Confluent and LinkedIn, and probably many other companies who are using it (which, anecdotally, is many).
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Options for data source connections are immense. Not just which sources, but your options for *how* the data is brought in.
  • Constant updates (this is both good and bad at times).
  • User friendliness. I can get the data connections set up and draft some quick visuals, then release to the target audience and let them expand on it how they want to.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • Sometimes it becomes difficult to monitor our Kafka deployments. We've been able to overcome it largely using AWS MSK, a managed service for Apache Kafka, but a separate monitoring dashboard would have been great.
  • Simplify the process for local deployment of Kafka and provide a user interface to get visibility into the different topics and the messages being processed.
  • Learning curve around creation of broker and topics could be simplified
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It would be easier for users could Microsoft Power BI and Excel used the same programming languages.
  • Would like to see the online version of Microsoft Power BI be as powerful as the desktop version.
  • Publishing a Microsoft Power BI file online and then having to save the file is somewhat redundant.
  • Would like to export each page or chart as an image.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apache
Kafka is quickly becoming core product of the organization, indeed it is replacing older messaging systems. No better alternatives found yet
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Power BI is an excellent and scalable tool. It has a learning curve, but once you get past that, the sky is the limit and you can build from the most simple to the most complex dashboards. I have built everything from simple reports with only a few data points to complex reports with many pages and advanced filtering.
Read full review
Usability
Apache
Apache Kafka is highly recommended to develop loosely coupled, real-time processing applications. Also, Apache Kafka provides property based configuration. Producer, Consumer and broker contain their own separate property file
Read full review
Microsoft
Automating reporting has reduced manual data processing by 50-70%, freeing up analysts for higher-value tasks. A finance team that previously spent 20+ hours per week on Excel-based reports now does it in minutes with Microsoft Power BI's automated Real-time dashboards have shortened decision cycles by 30-40%, enabling leadership to react quickly to sales trends, operational bottlenecks, and customer behavior.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
Support for Apache Kafka (if willing to pay) is available from Confluent that includes the same time that created Kafka at Linkedin so they know this software in and out. Moreover, Apache Kafka is well known and best practices documents and deployment scenarios are easily available for download. For example, from eBay, Linkedin, Uber, and NYTimes.
Read full review
Microsoft
It is a fantastic tool, you can do almost everything related with data and reports, it is a perfect substitutive of Power Point and Excel with a high evolution and flexibility, and also it is very friendly and easy to share. I think all companies should have Power BI (or other BI tool) in their software package and if they are in the MS Suite, for sure Power BI should be the one due to all the benefits of the MS ecosystem.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
It was integrated with our erp easily and was accessible on cloud.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
I used other messaging/queue solutions that are a lot more basic than Confluent Kafka, as well as another solution that is no longer in the market called Xively, which was bought and "buried" by Google. In comparison, these solutions offer way fewer functionalities and respond to other needs.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Power BI is free. If I didn't want to create a custom platform (i.e. my organization insisted on an existing platform that I *had* to use), I'd use Microsoft Power BI. For any start-up or SMB, I'd just use Claude & Grok to build it quickly, also for free. Would not pay for Tableau or Sigma anymore. Not worth it at all.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Positive: Get a quick and reliable pub/sub model implemented - data across components flows easily.
  • Positive: it's scalable so we can develop small and scale for real-world scenarios
  • Negative: it's easy to get into a confusing situation if you are not experienced yet or something strange has happened (rare, but it does). Troubleshooting such situations can take time and effort.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Power BI usage reduced the effort of analytical reports creation by about 80%
  • Empowered all the level of employee to be more vigilant of the data and business insights, gained the profit of 8% overall.
  • AI-powered predictive analytics improved forecasting accuracy by 17%, that topped the overall sales.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Microsoft Power BI Screenshots

Screenshot of Microsoft Power BI - Turns insights into impact for business usersScreenshot of Power BI integrates easily with Microsoft 365Screenshot of Microsoft Power BI - AI-Powered CapabilitiesScreenshot of Microsoft Power BI - Copilot can be used to create reportsScreenshot of Microsoft Power BI - Data HubScreenshot of Microsoft Power BI - Scales as organizational needs grow