Likelihood to Recommend There's really no reason to ever use Mesos. We switched over to
Kubernetes and it's been a breath of fresh air - better CD support, easy CLI for browsing logs, no mysterious dangling redeploys. If you're looking for a tool to manage a fleet of Docker containers on VMs,
Kubernetes beats Mesos by a wide margin.
Read full review Strengths [Foglight] Monitoring, Alerting and Management of on-prem virtualization and physical servers Historical trending and baselining are excellent and being able to compare a problem period against the same sets of data for a period when there was no issue is especially helpful as part of troubleshooting. Ease of use for end users is appreciated Weaknesses [of Foglight]
Creation and management of custom monitors is a developer level activity requiring Groovy skillset Less useful for management of an environment where there is a large amount of custom implementations Commitment to longevity of cartridges/packs for specific subsystems Ability to create custom schedules/alerts/escalations is only available via a 3rd party product (from a former Quest developer) and is not particularly easy to manage/manipulate Lack of API accessibility for external integrations to other analytics (splunk, etc.) Read full review Pros Mesos may have many frameworks. If you have Mesos installed on your servers, you may use it for many kinds of tasks. Today we're running only web applications but the idea is to install a different framework for big data soon. There is a good community growing around it. Read full review Database monitoring Database management suite Customization (both monitors and dashboards) Read full review Cons Unreliable deployments that would fail for no good reason. Sometimes our Docker container would be "restarting" forever because Mesos thought it didn't have enough resources to start the container. Impossibly slow UI. Built in React under the hood with a lot of bloatware backed in, so loading the Mesos UI on a slow internet connection was painful. No real logging solution - it would stream "console.log()" output to the UI, but searching for logs wasn't really possible without downloading a huge file. No built-in support for redeploying containers from a CI. We had to create a service whose whole job was to expose an HTTP endpoint that restarted a container, and then made Circle CI ping the endpoint whenever we wanted to redeploy. Read full review There are not many problems with this product Limited ability to use Foglight itself to solve problems it identifies Read full review Support Rating No real support channel, the Mesos
GitHub issues list was the only one we found and it wasn't particularly helpful.
Read full review Alternatives Considered Kubernetes is really great and their community is growing really fast (Google influence). We evaluated it in the beginning and it would fit for our web applications workload. We decided to proceed with Mesos because it has more potential. You may use a different framework for different kinds of tasks on Mesos. There is a
Kubernetes framework for Mesos, by the way.
Read full review Read full review Return on Investment It's optimizing our resources. It's improving our process. This argument is not just for Mesos, but we needed a tool like this to start changing and it works like a charm. It's open source. Read full review Foglight has a positive impact on my company by being a complete monitoring platform that specializes in risk assessment, user diagnosis and management, and server monitoring ensuring a secure business infrastructure through predictive analytics, query analysis, anomaly detection, behavior tracking, troubleshooting, automated discovery, and more. Read full review ScreenShots