Appsmith is an open source framework to build admin panels, CRUD apps and workflows.
$250
per month
Azure DevOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Azure DevOps (formerly VSTS, Microsoft Visual Studio Team System) is an agile development product that is an extension of the Microsoft Visual Studio architecture. Azure DevOps includes software development, collaboration, and reporting capabilities.
$2
per GB (first 2GB free)
OpenText LiquidOffice
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText offers LiquidOffice as a solution for users to create, publish and process forms using with their forms automation solution to help capture and validate actionable customer data, automate line of business workflows and enhance existing application ecosystems.
N/A
Pricing
Appsmith
Azure DevOps
OpenText LiquidOffice
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Azure Artifacts
$2
per GB (first 2GB free)
Basic Plan
$6
per user per month (first 5 users free)
Azure Pipelines - Self-Hosted
$15
per extra parallel job (1 free parallel job with unlimited minutes)
Azure Pipelines - Microsoft Hosted
$40
per parallel job (1,800 minutes free with 1 free parallel job)
Basic + Test Plan
$52
per user per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Appsmith
Azure DevOps
OpenText LiquidOffice
Free Trial
Yes
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Appsmith
Azure DevOps
OpenText LiquidOffice
Features
Appsmith
Azure DevOps
OpenText LiquidOffice
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Product A and Product B
Appsmith
-
Ratings
Azure DevOps
-
Ratings
OpenText LiquidOffice
7.3
3 Ratings
9% below category average
Survey templates
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Themes
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Product A and Product B
Appsmith
-
Ratings
Azure DevOps
-
Ratings
OpenText LiquidOffice
7.1
3 Ratings
18% below category average
Changes to live survey
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Question design help
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.43 Ratings
Multiple question types
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Product A and Product B
Appsmith
-
Ratings
Azure DevOps
-
Ratings
OpenText LiquidOffice
7.7
3 Ratings
7% below category average
Survey logic flexibility
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Appsmith
-
Ratings
Azure DevOps
-
Ratings
OpenText LiquidOffice
6.2
3 Ratings
26% below category average
Response tracking
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.73 Ratings
Data export
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.13 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.13 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.43 Ratings
Analytics
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.73 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Product A and Product B
Appsmith
-
Ratings
Azure DevOps
-
Ratings
OpenText LiquidOffice
6.2
3 Ratings
33% below category average
Access controls
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.43 Ratings
Compliance
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Product A and Product B
It is best suited if you want to build a tool for internal use purpose. It is even better suited if you have your data in Google Sheets. You can build apps with functionlity of CRUD where you can not just view but modify and add new entries so you can make good internal CRM tool or HR tool or anything that you need with the flexibility that Appsmith offers.
Azure DevOps works well when you’ve got larger delivery efforts with multiple teams and a lot of moving parts, and you need one place to plan work, track it properly, and see how everything links together. It’s especially useful when delivery and development are closely tied and you want backlog items, code and releases connected rather than spread across tools. Where it’s less of a fit is for small teams or simple pieces of work, as it can feel like more setup and process than you really need, and non-technical users often struggle with the interface. It also isn’t great if you want instant, easy programme-level views or a very visual planning experience without putting time into configuration.
OpenText LiquidOffice would be most suitable if you engage or already use the large array of OpenText information management solutions; as integrations would be swift. From my experience LiquidOffice has been a successful investment to provide secure eForms from authenticated users. The PDF standalone forms are flexible enough to be opened on any browser or PDF viewer. It is a superb solution to collect and validate information from your audiences.
I did mention it has good visibility in terms of linking, but sometimes items do get lost, so if there was a better way to manage that, that would be great.
The wiki is not the prettiest thing to look at, so it could have refinements there.
I don't think our organization will stray from using VSTS/TFS as we are now looking to upgrade to the 2012 version. Since our business is software development and we want to meet the requirements of CMMI to deliver consistent and high quality software, this SDLC management tool is here to stay. In addition, our company uses a lot of Microsoft products, such as Office 365, Asp.net, etc, and since VSTS/TFS has proved itself invaluable to our own processes and is within the Microsoft family of products, we will continue to use VSTS/TFS for a long, long time.
It's a great help to get more information about new feature release and stay updated on what the dev team is working on. I like how easy it is to just login and read through the work items. Each work item has basic details: Title, Description, Assigned to, State, Area (what it belongs to), and iteration (when it’s worked on). See image above.They move through different states (New → Discovery → Ready for Prod → etc.).
It's easy to use from both ends; form creator and the one filling the surveys. It's easy to view the forms from all browsers with ease. It's also simple to use due to the drag and drop process modelling to configure forms in minutes with smooth scripting and integration capabilities.
When we've had issues, both Microsoft support and the user community have been very responsive. DevOps has an active developer community and frankly, you can find most of your questions already asked and answered there. Microsoft also does a better job than most software vendors I've worked with creating detailed and frequently updated documentation.
Not very good especially with its ever increasing feature set. It becomes a little clunky in the beginning. Although most of the features are easy to use, a basic tech support or training module could do wonders for the software
Microsoft Planner is used by project managers and IT service managers across our organization for task tracking and running their team meetings. Azure DevOps works better than Planner for software development teams but might possibly be too complex for non-software teams or more business-focused projects. We also use ServiceNow for IT service management and this tool provides better analysis and tracking of IT incidents, as Azure DevOps is more suited to development and project work for dev teams.
OpenText LiquidOffice's has a very simple to understand and relatively powerful form builder. The workflow designer is also very easy to pick up and requires users to have minimal training. OpenText Liquid Office does look a lot older than other products in its class though and I feel would benefit from a more fresh and modern design.
We have saved a ton of time not calculating metrics by hand.
We no longer spend time writing out cards during planning, it goes straight to the board.
We no longer track separate documents to track overall department goals. We were able to create customized icons at the department level that lets us track each team's progress against our dept goals.