Esri in Redlands, California offers ArcGIS, a geographic information system.
$100
per year
Tebra EHR
Score 1.0 out of 10
N/A
Tebra (formerly Kareo) provides a full-featured EHR. It is designed to fit the way its users work. Some key features include: Comprehensive Dashboard, Scheduler, Documentation, and Notes.
$150
per provider/per month
Pricing
ArcGIS
Tebra EHR
Editions & Modules
Viewer
$100
per year
ArcGIS for Personal Use
$100
per year
ArcGIS for Student Use
$100
per year
Editor
$200
per year
Field Worker
$350
per year
Creator
$500
per year
GIS Professional Basic
$700
per year
GIS Professional Basic
2,750
per year
GIS Professional Advanced
3,800
per year
Kareo Practice Management (Low Claim Volume)
$150
per provider/per month
Kareo Practice Management (Unlimited Claims)
$300
per provider/per month
Kareo Billing Services
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ArcGIS
Tebra EHR
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ArcGIS
Tebra EHR
Features
ArcGIS
Tebra EHR
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
ArcGIS
-
Ratings
Tebra EHR
4.0
5 Ratings
61% below category average
Real-time eligibility verification
00 Ratings
4.04 Ratings
Claims management
00 Ratings
4.04 Ratings
Coding
00 Ratings
4.05 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
ArcGIS
-
Ratings
Tebra EHR
1.0
4 Ratings
154% below category average
Calendar interface
00 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
ArcGIS
-
Ratings
Tebra EHR
2.2
5 Ratings
106% below category average
Charting / document management
00 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
Templates
00 Ratings
2.04 Ratings
Patient portal
00 Ratings
1.05 Ratings
Speech recognition
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Customization
00 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
E-prescribing
00 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
I'm very grateful to be able to use it, and I have a master's degree with a focus in Geospatial Analysis. There can be a bit of a learning curve, and I try to build user-friendly ways for volunteers to see & collect data. Meanwhile, if a colleague is less confident with building such a system, it may be more difficult for them to implement.
Kareo is not an appropriate application for any real-world clinical need. It is highly unreliable, crashing frequently, and often becomes frozen. It also cannot ingest data from Therapy Notes, which was a promised feature of the platform according to the sales team. Additionally, when we ran into reliability issues (every day, with every clinician at the practice, across a dozen different office locations with different internet service providers) we were not offered the ability to cancel our contract. Until the reliability issues are fixed Kareo is not well-suited to any use case because it does not work.
Simply because the program deserves it. It seems to me that it is a fundamental tool for the storage, analysis, and interpretation of medium and large-scale phenomena, unmanageable with traditional engineering software. Its versatility in the handling of the different "layers" with which the data is handled and interpolation tools, make this software a powerful ally both for companies and for the educational part of the universities.
Kareo was a massive waste of money. It's an unreliable product without promised features and sold by a disingenuous sales team. We will stick to reliable services like Doxy, Therapy Notes, etc.
Once set up, the tools are extremely easy to use. I had a staff member develop a tool for field data collection, that included an external and internal dashboards to monitor progress in days. The field workers that collected the data, barely knew how to use a computer, and within minutes they could use the application that was configured for them.
Unlike other platforms (ex: EMSI), there is no "help desk" new users can easily call into for troubleshooting or errors, and so you have to spend LOTS of time trying workarounds. This is also because the help center blog posts are usually pretty confusing, and many times do not include images or videos to help you along. Any such changes would be immensely useful!
My students love the "drop" feature in Google Maps, but besides that it truly doesn't compare. I love that you can add, delete, or change layers to this map to better understand its larger affect. There are many more ways to manipulate maps on ArcGIS than on Google Maps. I can also add personal details and information if I want to create a specific map, something that I am unable to do with Google
I selected Kareo EHR because it was a lot simpler to use and the customer service was definitely better. Every representative I have spoken to has been super friendly and helpful.
We have negative reviews as we were sold a product that left out some key variables. Things we really needed to make the transition.
I don't think KAREO is good for small business (0-10 employees) because their prices for additional or standard features is steep. They charge by the therapist to boot and it is steep!
Again ASK questions; do a test run; ask about the migration of your data and its charges.
You sign with them you will be locked into a 12 month contract with no out clause. If they are costing you the money you have to stay with them.