Archer offers a platform for holistic integrated risk management solutions that empower enterprise organizations to more effectively manage risk, ensure compliance, and address emerging challenges.
N/A
BigID
Score 6.5 out of 10
N/A
BigID in New York offers a data intelligence platform that helps organizations proactively discover, manage, protect, and get more value from their regulated, sensitive, personal, and critical data across their data landscape. BigID Helps Organizations Find, Inventory, Map and Correlate Data Across All Types of Data, In Any Language, At Petabyte-scale, In the Data Center or Cloud.
N/A
Diligent One Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Diligent One Platform offers a unified solution for Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) management, providing a comprehensive overview of risks and insights in one place.
Solution from RSA was much simpler and easy to customize over it's competition at that time. The modular architecture was also the key to selecting the tool as it gives you flexibility to adopt in a gradual way rather than figuring out to deploy a complete tool to justify the …
Microsoft Dynamics is a useful tool with easy integration to toolsets for analytics, and has a remarkable ease of use. The accessibility and discoverability in RSA Archer is more difficult, as sections get densely nested. The search capability in Dynamics is smoother but …
Better automation and control over process. Better reporting of progress. Better value for our dollar and pricing structure. I like that our costs are not driven by our utilization. This allows us to apply Archer to new areas without the immediate need to justify additional …
Both have similar functions, but it was decided that a separate application was desired for Risk and Compliance Systems. This was partly due to Line of Business Ownership and separation of duties.
It has been roughly 5 years since I have seen Securevue, so a lot can change, but to me it felt like several products were purchased and an attempt was made to piece them all together into a single solution (and I believe that may have been true). It also required agents on …
Oracle E-Business Suite Technical/Functional Analyst
Chose BigID
Affordable, scalable, seamlessly integrates with other applications, easy to configure and use. Great customer and product support. Affordable extended product support.
My experience in this regard has been limited unfortunately. Before Diligent our work was Excel based and in my previous company this type of activity was done through an in-house system which was custom built to suit the business. While Excel offer flexibility I would sum up …
We originally considered SharePoint and made the mistake of choosing Diligent One Platform. We thrilled to be going back to SharePoint; in our experience, Diligent One Platform was a complete waste of time and money.
Diligent One Platform is the best to me so far and it really does well to make use of technology and gadgets to have a paperless environment that can be easily updated and keeps track of changes and archives old documents well. Also has a level of safety from cyber attacks. It …
Even do I personally did not have previous experience with other solutions, the approach that Diligent One Platform has to show the real risks in the organization, how easy is to manage this information that is complex by definition and the support that gives us to 'create a …
The tool is extremely rigid in its definitions. We tried to implement it for almost a year and nothing happen. One time a team member made a mistake and uploaded a wrong list risks to it was not possible to eliminate any of them we had to take the database down, erase …
Cheaper. We retain diligent due to the cost. The other products have more advanced tools but unfortunately due to overall cost and time to implement we are limited in exploring other options at this time.
Archer is better suited for an environment that has at least some maturity in its program, whatever that program may be. If an organization does not know stakeholders involved, or the workflow for its own process, or has the technology in place to perform vulnerability scans, then Archer will probably not be much help. If an organization knows these items, but it's all paper based or in Excel spreadsheets, or they are struggling to report on them, or notify an individual when it is their time to take action in a process, then Archer can be a tremendous help.
Diligent Community is well suited for entities in the public sector who need to comply with the Brown Act. Diligent One Platform is not well suitable for those who are not tech savvy. Board members who are older and do not use the Diligent One Platform frequently, are not comfortable using some of the functionality - such as voting - so it still needs to be done on the back-end.
Integration capabilities to multiple enterprise systems
Control standards and Procedures to address multiple regulatory/authoritative sources, standards and frameworks enabling test once satisfy many requiremnts
Rapid application development and User friendly tool with configuration capability to customize easily without user requiring programming or coding skills
Enhance business compliance by maintaining records and documents for all our processes and reports, which allows us to not worry about training new people in case resources are transferred.
We integrated risk assessment tools and business continuity plans, which allowed proactive identification and mitigation of potential business risks.
It helped to secure communication channels with confidential discussions and document sharing among team members and leadership.
Good tool to get the information communicated, approval workflow, and easy to add new findings/questionnaires. Seems to be compatible with different browsers and little downtime. Only request for improvement is to add an export feature with fewer clicks. Maybe batch export.
The new platform seems to be much easier to use. The other had a lot of wasted space and it seems that has all been fixed. I like all of the new features and being so used to boarddocs, I was not sure about learning something new but I see that it will make my life easier.
Our RSA Archer team is dedicated to finding solutions for our organization. They haven't mentioned any issues with receiving support with deployment or bug fixes, and generally the platform is very dependable. They are always very excited about delivering a version upgrade and presenting any new features that provide more dashboards or chart types.
HighBond by Galvanize support has some of the best and fastest support that I have experienced. Though we only contact them through emails, they were quick to provide insightful information about our problems. Whenever we email them about an issue, they would be able to reply in less than an hour, ready and prepared with useful solutions to address the issue.
We’re pretty satisfied with the implementation offering and the reading experiences provided. With our quarterly audits, this tool has made the task much more accessible. The outcome of version control of documents is easy to accomplish, and gathering all the records in one place makes it more accessible.
Microsoft Dynamics is a useful tool with easy integration to toolsets for analytics, and has a remarkable ease of use. The accessibility and discoverability in RSA Archer is more difficult, as sections get densely nested. The search capability in Dynamics is smoother but reliant on complete words being used, whereas RSA Archer searching is full Boolean.
Affordable, scalable, seamlessly integrates with other applications, easy to configure and use. Great customer and product support. Affordable extended product support.
My experience in this regard has been limited unfortunately. Before Diligent our work was Excel based and in my previous company this type of activity was done through an in-house system which was custom built to suit the business. While Excel offer flexibility I would sum up our previous challenges with using an Excel based platform as follows: 1-Version control was a disaster to manage in a big company. There was not always a single version of the truth and broken formulas can derail the process and set us back significantly 2-Excel lacks the clear audit trails we wanted, specifically if we consider the key compliance areas of the business 3-Reporting to Exco took too long, relied on key individual skills in data analytics and reporting