Archibus by Eptura vs. Chrome Sign Builder

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Archibus
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
Archibus is an IWMS solution based on the IWMS capabilities of the former ARCHIBUS product line and the workspace planning and optimization solutions of the former Serraview, which merged with ARCHIBUS in December 2018.N/A
Chrome Sign Builder
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Chrome Sign Builder, from Google, is a digital signage utility that allows users to schedule and display content across managed Chrome devices and networks, built to make it easy to show web content content such as restaurant menus, images, and YouTube videos and playlists–as well as Google Presentations, which can be edited by anyone who has access to the presentation.N/A
Pricing
Archibus by EpturaChrome Sign Builder
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ArchibusChrome Sign Builder
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Archibus by EpturaChrome Sign Builder
Best Alternatives
Archibus by EpturaChrome Sign Builder
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Zoom Rooms
Zoom Rooms
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Archibus by EpturaChrome Sign Builder
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(3 ratings)
7.5
(25 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Archibus by EpturaChrome Sign Builder
Likelihood to Recommend
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
Archibus is well suited for organizations requiring heavy reporting functions, and that have complex processes for managing moves and space chargebacks. It is less well suited for organizations that require input from multiple users (such as doing an employee seating survey).
Read full review
Google
Chrome Sign Builder seems to work best when only one or two resources are displayed. Rotating through multiple screens in slideshow format without a ready ability to advance and pause causes some problems. When scheduling five outdoor ranges and a clubhouse, individuals have to stand and watch as sometimes complex calendars scroll by focusing on specific data and time. On the other hand, when limited to one or two rouses, the system works well enough.
Read full review
Pros
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Detail uploads of floor plans
  • Web based portal
  • Customizable service
Read full review
Google
  • schedule YouTube videos and playlists
  • Use Chrome Sign Builder to display menus. For example, to show menus for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, create 3 schedules. Each schedule has its own menu URL to display the menu content.
  • create a presentation using Google Slides and display it using Chrome Sign Builder.
  • When you publish the presentation, set it to start as soon as it loads and restart again after the last slide.
Read full review
Cons
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Lease Management's data structure may need more flexibility to adopt different business needs.
  • Capital Project Management need simpler interfaces and workflows to improve end user experience.
Read full review
Google
  • Would be good if there was a way if it could update live rather than needing to export the JSON file and upload it to the management console manually
  • Could be more visual based to make more complicated layouts easier rather than needing to use percentages.
  • Dated design compared to Google's latest UI upgrade
Read full review
Usability
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
User perspective it is simple through a web portal that shows all spaces and buildings. But as an administrator it was quite a bit of work to set up. And by extension updating is also a lot of work
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
Google
Support can be sparse, lengthy wait times, and sometimes not the most helpful solutions. If you really need assistance using it - contacting your VAR is a better bet than using Chrome Sign Builder support. We have also had frustrating cases where support will close tickets without a solution.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
Archibus compares well with other IWMS software when it comes to integrating with BIM models and reporting capabilities. I selected Archibus as it has all the tools and processes needed to manage space and moves, with the intention to expand to other modules like Lease Administration and Asset Management. The constant upgrades to Archibus also helps to keep the software up-to-date with other third party products such as Revit.
Read full review
Google
Chrome Sign Builder is very strong and flexible on manipulation and the quality of signs management is an effective and an excellent forms management system which is very easy on deployment and management of all our project documents. The easy-on reports building through Chrome Sign Builder is also another big point and the dashboard is very easy to adapt.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Met our business objectives
  • Positive ROI
Read full review
Google
  • As this is a free tool we save money on purchasing an alternative solution
  • Displaying pertinent signage through the building streamlines operations and provides the right data to those who need it
  • May not be as approachable to a new user, but someone with technical experience should have no issues getting started quickly with the tool
Read full review
ScreenShots