Aurea Process (formerly CX Process) from Aurea Software in Austin is a business process management offering, based on Savvion BPM.
$200,000
per year
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
ThreatDown (formerly Malwarebytes for Business), combines Malwarebytes' endpoint security capabilities in four bundles. The basic Core tier includes incident response, Next-gen AV, device control, vulnerability assessments, and the ability to block unwanted application.
$345
per year 5 endpoints (minimum)
Panda Systems Management
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Panda Security now offers system monitoring, client-less device management, patch management, and other capabilities via Panda Systems Management.
N/A
Pricing
Aurea Process
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Panda Systems Management
Editions & Modules
License
$200,000
per year
Core
$345
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
Advanced
$395
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
Elite
$495
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
Ultimate
$595
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aurea Process
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Panda Systems Management
Free Trial
No
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Optional Add-Ons include server and mobile device protection. Server protection ranges from $129 to $179 per annum depending on service tier. Mobile security is $10 per device, no matter the service tier. A 10% discount is offered for choosing a two-year billing plan.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aurea Process
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Panda Systems Management
Features
Aurea Process
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Panda Systems Management
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
5.3
1 Ratings
38% below category average
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
-
Ratings
Panda Systems Management
-
Ratings
Dashboards
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
5.8
1 Ratings
36% below category average
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
-
Ratings
Panda Systems Management
-
Ratings
Process designer
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process simulation
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business rules engine
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
SOA support
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process player
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model execution
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
4.0
1 Ratings
70% below category average
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
-
Ratings
Panda Systems Management
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
4.0
1 Ratings
68% below category average
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
-
Ratings
Panda Systems Management
-
Ratings
Content management
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
8.6
15 Ratings
1% above category average
Panda Systems Management
-
Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology
00 Ratings
8.314 Ratings
00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
00 Ratings
9.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Centralized Management
00 Ratings
9.715 Ratings
00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Infection Remediation
00 Ratings
8.414 Ratings
00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management
00 Ratings
8.413 Ratings
00 Ratings
Malware Detection
00 Ratings
8.615 Ratings
00 Ratings
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
-
Ratings
Panda Systems Management
9.0
1 Ratings
24% above category average
Virtualization monitoring
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
-
Ratings
Panda Systems Management
9.1
3 Ratings
22% above category average
Remote monitoring
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Network device monitoring
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Activity Monitoring
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Management Tasks
Comparison of Management Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
-
Ratings
Panda Systems Management
9.4
3 Ratings
29% above category average
Patch Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Policy-based automation
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Remote Access
Comparison of Remote Access features of Product A and Product B
The tool has potential. Its capabilities and visual aspects could be considered rather basic but this might improve, particularly if the business intelligence/analytics aspect is leveraged. Once running well, it could allow (perhaps smaller) companies to successfully improve their customers' experiences through digitalizing customer journey - and we all know that customer loyalty goes a long way. However, whether or not the tool is comprehensive enough to deliver this for larger companies with more complex, multi- and omni-channel interactions is yet to be seen...
I think Malwarebytes is the best anti-malware company. I think it is well-suited for any situation and any device. I think Malwarebytes does the best on Windows and on MacOS. Also, Malwarebytes is always improving, and you can tell they are a company that stays on top of cybersecurity trends. If you have a tight budget or looking for the cheapest solution, then Malwarebytes may not be the solution for you. To clarify, I don't think Malwarebytes is that much more expensive compared to its closest competitors.
Panda Systems Management is well suited for small to medium sized organizations looking for a tool to centralize asset management not only physical but also assist with rapid deployment of patches, applications, etc. It proves also to be very beneficial as permits (to and extent) to do troubleshooting without interfering or interrupting end users.
Protects against malware - No matter how much training you give end users on social hacking, there is always a breach at some point.
Protects against ransomware - Ransomware could spell disaster for a company...it could literally shut the doors for good.
Centralized administration - Without a terrific centralized method to manage all the systems being protected, it would require an extra position just to maintain all endpoints.
When I first used the tool in my home systems MANY years ago, I wished for a Business version. I was once at a focus group for a major antivirus company, and one attendee’s feedback to “what could we do better?” was “buy out MalwareBytes and add it to your tool”. I’ve used the Business version since it first became available, and have continued to be a dedicated user through the many iterations and improvements
It simply works. It doesn't require the hand-holding and monitoring that some other solutions do. It's simple to deploy and maintain, and adding custom content such as Exceptions require minimal effort. I’ve had to add a few exceptions for internal-use, in-house-developed tools, but it’s quite simple to do so within the online interface
As I mentioned, we have only email support. Their phone support was very expensive. If we ever have any issues, we have to email them and wait for their response. In most cases, I have figured out the issue on my own. The software is very stable so we haven't used their support much.
We rate and recommend Panda Systems Management not only because it is a very effective and very cost effective solution that pays itself for us (ROI) extremely fast, but also due to all reason described previously and possibly a few more I'm sure we missed here. I do have to says tech support for this solution sometimes leave a bit to be desired.
I first implemented this more than 10 years ago, when it required an in-site setup with SQL Server (or SQL Express), and even that was pretty easy. With the move to centralized web management some treats ago, it’s become even easier to deploy
It's no contest. Cisco AMP, Umbrella and Endpoint use vast amounts of resources and provide little protection when compared with Malwarebytes. One client recently replaced Cisco with MWB and found over 7,300 vulnerabilities on 352 endpoints, including 120 listed as Critical and 7,180 listed as High, with CVE's dating back to 2008.
Panda is a bit of a greatest hits between some of these other things. I feel like GoToAssist has a stronger remote support option, but Panda is more convenient. Kaseya has a ton of features, but from an ease of use standpoint, Panda seems stronger. Spiceworks has a fine inventory system but it lacks features. I added Azure as well since we are a 365 shop and Azure supplies a lot of the same visibility that Panda does. However it is a completely different animal, and it's way easier to hop into Panda and get what you need than get waaay more data than necessary from Azure/Azure AD/ATP.
As our customers vary in size and maturity, the ROI ranges accordingly.
For younger, smaller businesses this is a useful tool. Digitalization of he customer journey has certainly helped save time and efforts in many cases.
For more mature market players the tool is not always comprehensive enough. Dashboard and report personalization take time and efforts, and sometimes it feels that a dedicated BI tool would be a more suitable solution.
The ease of remediation has saved our IT team a number of hours manually installing, for example, the free version of Malwarebytes to remove infections, and then cleaning the machine up. Being able to centrally send commands to clean the device is much more efficient.
The centralised management has also alerted us to infections on machines that we might not otherwise have known about, as the existing AV had not detected them, saving us potential data loss, or system damage.