Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aurigo Enterprise
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
A construction-oriented project portfolio management solution, Aurigo Enterprise helps commercial builders, school districts, universities, hospitals, and healthcare systems prioritize and deliver every construction project on time and on budget with a cloud solution designed to manage the nuances of construction and maintenance projects. As a cloud solution it can be used from any mobile device or browser.N/A
AutoCAD Web
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
AutoCAD mobile (formerly AutoCAD 360) is an easy to use drawing and drafting app from Autodesk. It enables users in design, construction, and engineering industries to view, create, mark-up, edit, and share drawings on mobile devices.
$5
Per User Per Month
Planview AdaptiveWork
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Planview AdaptiveWork is a web-based collaborative work management software. Planview AdaptiveWork enables users to connect employees and partners and create documents, reports and specialized workflow automation. Planview AdaptiveWork is designed to work across multiple teams to enable cross-company task, project, and resource management.N/A
Pricing
Aurigo EnterpriseAutoCAD WebPlanview AdaptiveWork
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Premium
$5.00
Per User Per Month
Ultimate
$15.00
Per User Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aurigo EnterpriseAutoCAD WebPlanview AdaptiveWork
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aurigo EnterpriseAutoCAD WebPlanview AdaptiveWork
Considered Multiple Products
Aurigo Enterprise

No answer on this topic

AutoCAD Web
Chose AutoCAD Web
Although there are lots of alternatives to AutoCAD mobile on the Google play store and the app store, many of these alternatives are not professionally developed and are associated with shady developers. So there might be a privacy or security risk with the usage these …
Chose AutoCAD Web
They are similar but the online/cloud feature of Fusion provides a better user experience across platforms.
Chose AutoCAD Web
I selected AutoCAD 360 because I had no idea how to work on in-house designs, plans, and geographic spaces. I invested part of the time in this innovative tool and I keep using it to have a clear idea of the materials that I should use in the different projects that I evaluate.
Chose AutoCAD Web
The AutoCAD 360 can work directly from the program, making changes or indicating where changes should be made while agreements are reached for the good of the project you are working on, the other systems show you the plan, but they do not help you with the edit or modifications
Chose AutoCAD Web
Although Draftsight is free and open source, AutoCAD 360 is better than Draftsight because more people use it. AutoCAD caters more to the "big" user base. It has a rather large learning curve though, however, there are many Youtube videos on explanations of how to use the …
Chose AutoCAD Web
As far as I know, Solidworks doesn't really have any sort of software like this, and that is pretty much the other industry standard I like to use a lot. So there really isn't any other competition out there competing with AutoCAD 360 which is kind of unfortunate as having …
Chose AutoCAD Web
Revit is another step above CAD 360 as more information can be added as well as more consultants and third party designers are starting to move toward those programs. I think the cloud compatibility is headed in the right direction and Autodesk is always trying to make the …
Chose AutoCAD Web
The best thing about AutoCAD is that it can create a Universal Output for any related software, irrelevant if it was created by Autodesk. Just about any software can interface with dwg or dxf file types to name a few. AutoCAD doesn't have a direct 1:1 that's comparable in my …
Planview AdaptiveWork
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
It's about the same. It should be noted that Planview AdaptiveWork was not our first choice. We selected Planview PPM Pro & ProjectPlace based on capabilities and roadmap. There were roadmap items that were going to solve several business problems and allow us to leverage …
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork is able to handle the volume of resourcing that we do as well as forecasting out multiple years where other systems were not able to do so.
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork is massively more customisable, leading inevitably to a high skill cap for editing and usage.
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
I've always enjoyed working with AdaptiveWork. It's a customizable tool that is easy for the end user to use.
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
We ended up going w/ Planview AdaptiveWork due to a more flexible time and expense capturing functionality.
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
I like that Planview AdaptiveWork is the full gamot for project, program and portfolio management. Building project plans, tracking tasks risks and issues, and being able to roll all of it up into comprehensive reports and dashboards is awesome. All of the new integrations …
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
We felt that Planview AdaptiveWork had the most potential to grow into the system and really liked that we could add on other Planview products if needed in the future. The system also felt more approachable for colleagues who might be less familiar with project, program, and …
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
More elaborate system in managing a project.
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
We also evaluated Kantana. Ultimately decided on Planview AdaptiveWork because of cost, ease of GUI, ease of configuration, reporting capabilities and integration capabilities.
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork was the right size, at the right price point that fit our customization and integration flexibility. It is intuitive to use but allowed us to add complexity as our needs grew
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
We moved from ConnectWise Manage to Planview AdaptiveWork. AdaptiveWork is so much more user friendly. Reporting is so much easier. Capacity planner is better.
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
We selected Adaptive Work for it's ease of configurability, advanced scheduling capabilities, and workflow capabilities.
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
Starting with the basisc of Daily Project Planning and Follow-up
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
As an IT professional in the field for over 15 years I have used multiple platforms to track projects and migrate resource data for analysis as well as creating dashboards for better leadership visualization. Planview is one of the best ones I have used as it has a lot of …
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
I believe Planview AdaptiveWork falls short.
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview Clarizen empowers us to spend less time aggregating on and more time acting on the data get a clear picture of the current and future requirements and visualize the portfolio and pivot quickly with changing business needs. Great product that empowers teams to reach …
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
Clarizen has a cleaner, easier-to-use UI than both Wrike and Microsoft Project in my opinion. Clarizen is overall pretty intuitive and you can use it on a daily basis to manage your projects without it taking up an exorbitant amount of time. Although I would say Wrike is …
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
It stacks up well to many other products. It is lightweight and intuitive to use. However, if you are a heavy Project user, or are considering a Project at the enterprise level, this might not be as sophisticated/ heavyweight as those kinds of products. However, for all but …
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
We are working on a Fixed work basis and have been using Clarizen for quite a long time. Clarizen helped us to track our project, requests, and billing in one shot, so we planned to stay with Clarizen.
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
Clarizen's ease of use, ease of setup, out-of-the-box delivery, project management, and time management were the factors for choosing Clarizen. All were good products but we are happy to have selected Clarizen.
Chose Planview AdaptiveWork
MS Project could not come close to matching the time tracking and forecasting abilities of Clarizen.
Features
Aurigo EnterpriseAutoCAD WebPlanview AdaptiveWork
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Aurigo Enterprise
-
Ratings
AutoCAD Web
8.0
Ratings
3% above category average
Planview AdaptiveWork
-
Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data exportability00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Aurigo Enterprise
-
Ratings
AutoCAD Web
7.6
Ratings
2% above category average
Planview AdaptiveWork
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists00 Ratings4.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation00 Ratings7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports00 Ratings6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools00 Ratings7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals00 Ratings6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
As-built drawings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Submittal design and management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Aurigo EnterpriseAutoCAD WebPlanview AdaptiveWork
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 1.5 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 1.5 out of 10
Teamwork.com
Teamwork.com
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Teamwork.com
Teamwork.com
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Wrike
Wrike
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Aurigo EnterpriseAutoCAD WebPlanview AdaptiveWork
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.4
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Aurigo EnterpriseAutoCAD WebPlanview AdaptiveWork
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
We utilize the software for remote access to our projects. It has come in the handiest when an unexpected issue arises and we don't have the right project files on our laptop. We can easily access our information from the cloud. If you need to download/print to a PDF file, this software is not able to do this.
Read full review
I've been an AdaptiveWork (Clarizen) admin for the past 14 years, so I've seen much improvement since I started working with the product. I'm very happy we can utilize the hybrid mode by using the cards, I think this was long overdue but it works very well.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Download a file from my cloud storage site
  • The zoom in and zoom out tool
  • The cloud line type for further evaluation
  • The rotation function on 3D models
  • The displacement command for lines and blocks
  • The lines and polines drawing command
Read full review
  • Many ways to acclimate to the system; documentation, videos, community, and contacts.
  • Planview provides scalable customization options tailored to the unique needs of each business unit or department. Easily add or remove fields in the system. As the admin, it was easy to learn how to configure.
  • Offers flexibility to adapt to existing systems and align with organizational workflows and processes. There are multiple ways to customize each part of the system to meet our needs.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Lite version should be available for lower end devices.
  • Editing drawings is a complex and time consuming task (even simple edits).
  • Finding drawings on the mobile is a hassle.
Read full review
  • Planview AdaptiveWork's ability to create relations between work estimates, resources, and time is one of its strengths but also one of its drawbacks. The average user is a little less considerate of the way these things interact with each and the automatic way in which Planview AdaptiveWork will affect one or the other can occasionally create a confusing scenario if the user is unaware of how changing one will affect the other
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
This is so useful so we would like to keep renewing as Autocad 360 does. In fact we are very optimistic about the tools that come in every renewal because we will then have even more features available.
Read full review
I give my renewal of this product a 9. It's only because we never know what product may come out next and how other factors in our office political environment may cause impact upon this. If I always had my way, this is what we'd settle on as our de facto project management system.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
It is easy to configure, intuitive. The customization process is in some ways better than Salesforce.com. It has a great UI. It does however depend on how it's implemented.

The design of it is generally fine, however the ability to data upload people from a spreadsheet is an obvious miss.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Sometimes it is slow when everyone is entering their time on Fridays or Mondays but other than that we rarely see downtime and maintenance notifications are well in advance.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Reports: Quick to Reasonable

Most Ancillary Pages: Quick to Reasonable
(By "ancillary" I mean lesser used/master data maintenance pages - e.g. People, Customers, Individual Tasks, Milestones, etc.)

Work Plan (with 100 sub items): Reasonable to Slow
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
It's a good experience overall. Clarizen was useful when needed. It's mostly needed for advice on how to do more sophisticated actions or how to change something that was set up administratively. It's seldom used otherwise. The product consistently works, the documentation is acceptable, and the generally intuitive product is easy enough for most staff to pick up without much issue.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
• We worked with a Project Manager on their side. He was very good about developing a project plan to hit our goal. I think we had weekly or twice weekly calls – very steady cadence over 3 month period.
• Their PM skills were great – kept us on task. For the last week, they sent 2 people on site and they did training for power users. After that a couple of them revisited here
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
It's easy to access and frequently offered. Often I'm amongst only a few people on the call and get virtually individual attention. I also learn and share with the other attendees and we can see how we've each solved similar challenges.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
We have been able to implement AdaptiveWork pretty easily but it requires updating of resource availability and continuous training as roles change and new people join the company. Other documentation is used such as spreadsheets for longer range planning and project approval
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I selected AutoCAD 360 because I had no idea how to work on in-house designs, plans, and geographic spaces. I invested part of the time in this innovative tool and I keep using it to have a clear idea of the materials that I should use in the different projects that I evaluate.
Read full review
Planview AdaptiveWork was the right size, at the right price point that fit our customization and integration flexibility. It is intuitive to use but allowed us to add complexity as our needs grew
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • AutoCAD 360 has saved a tremendous amount of time in file sharing and reviewing files. I know I'm getting repetitive, but having such a small convenience like this honestly saves so much time, and makes life so much easier.
Read full review
  • Planview AdaptiveWork allows us to report out on the status of our real estate projects on a regular basis. We have internal objectives that need to be met for on-time delivery and Planview AdaptiveWork provides us the data to be able to show how the teams are tracking on delivery.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Planview AdaptiveWork Screenshots

Screenshot of AdaptiveWork's Portfolio ManagementScreenshot of Integration Through an Array of AppsScreenshot of Real-Time Project ManagementScreenshot of Social Collaboration - From Ideation to Project Delivery