TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Portainer vs. Tanzu Application Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AAWS Elastic Beanstalk is the platform-as-a-service offering provided by Amazon and designed to leverage AWS services such as Amazon Elastic Cloud Compute (Amazon EC2), Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3).

    $35

    per month

    Portainer

    Score9.8 out of 10
    N/APortainer is a centralized container management platform for containerized apps and IoT device management. It helps accelerate container adoption and reduce time-to-value on Kubernetes, Docker, and Swarm with a management portal, allowing users to deliver and manage containerized applications from the data center to the edge. Portainer helps - Reduce the operational complexity associated with multi-cluster management Bridge the skills gap and facilitate feature…

    $0

    Tanzu Application Platform

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ATanzu Application Platform is a single, end-to-end integrated platform solution that enables companies to build and deploy more software, more quickly and securely, through a rich set of developer tooling and a pre-paved path to production.N/A
    Pricing
    AWS Elastic BeanstalkPortainerTanzu Application Platform
    Editions & Modules
    No Charge
    $0
    Users pay for AWS resources (e.g. EC2, S3 buckets, etc.) used to store and run the application.
    Portainer Business - 3 Nodes Free
    $0
    Home & Student
    $149
    per year
    Starter
    $995
    per year
    Professional
    $2995
    per year
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales for Pricing
    per year
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS Elastic BeanstalkPortainerTanzu Application Platform
    Free Trial
    NoYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AWS Elastic BeanstalkPortainerTanzu Application Platform
    Considered Multiple Products
    Amazon AWS
    No answer on this topic
    Portainer
    No answer on this topic
    Broadcom
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    88%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    94 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    87 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    88%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    94 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    75 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    92 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    AWS Elastic BeanstalkPortainerTanzu Application Platform
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Portainer and Tanzu Application Platform
    Feature
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    7.8
    28 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Portainer
    -
    Ratings
    Tanzu Application Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Ease of building user interfaces8.018 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability7.028 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform management overhead8.027 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability7.022 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform access control8.027 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration8.027 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Development environment creation7.027 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Development environment replication8.028 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification8.027 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue recovery9.025 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes8.026 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Portainer and Tanzu Application Platform
    Feature
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    -
    Ratings
    Portainer
    8.6
    94 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Tanzu Application Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Security and Isolation00 Ratings8.790 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cluster Management00 Ratings8.575 Ratings00 Ratings
    Storage Management00 Ratings8.680 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings8.183 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discovery Tools00 Ratings8.970 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings8.690 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AWS Elastic BeanstalkPortainerTanzu Application Platform
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Red Hat OpenShift
    Score9.1 out of 10
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AWS Elastic BeanstalkPortainerTanzu Application Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (28 ratings)
    8.6
    (94 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.9
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (10 ratings)
    8.5
    (15 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (12 ratings)
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AWS Elastic BeanstalkPortainerTanzu Application Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    I have been using AWS Elastic Beanstalk for more than 5 years, and it has made our life so easy and hassle-free. Here are some scenarios where it excels -
    • I have been using different AWS services like EC2, S3, Cloudfront, Serverless, etc. And Elastic Beanstalk makes our lives easier by tieing each service together and making the deployment a smooth process.
    • N number of integrations with different CI/CD pipelines make this most engineer's favourite service.
    • Scalability & Security comes with the service, which makes it the absolute perfect product for your business.
    Personally, I haven't found any situations where it's not appropriate for the use cases it can be used. The pricing is also very cost-effective.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Portainer
    Many developers, especially lesser experienced developers, don't have a really good background in setting up containers from the command line. Portainer is invaluable to them. Giving a UI to them gives them much more confidence and allows them to learn properties and capabilities of containers under far less stress. On the flip side of this, giving then a UI on a production system can lead to chaos...never give junior developers access to production servers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Getting a project set up using the console or CLI is easy compared to other [computing] platforms.
    • AWS Elastic Beanstalk supports a variety of programming languages so teams can experiment with different frameworks but still use the same compute platform for rapid prototyping.
    • Common application architectures can be referenced as patterns during project [setup].
    • Multiple environments can be deployed for an application giving more flexibility for experimentation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Portainer
    • Separating server maintenance with application development, providing a clear user interface for developers who don't want to worry about the underlying server.
    • RBAC for container deployment linked to a SAML IDP, not something particularly easy in a native Docker instance but point and shoot in Portainer, allowing the use of Azure / Okta etc to provide user access.
    • Image management with multiple repositories is super clear and reduces incidents
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Limited to the frameworks and configurations that AWS supports. There is no native way to use Elastic Beanstalk to deploy a Go application behind Nginx, for example.
    • It's not always clear what's changed on an underlying system when AWS updates an EB stack; the new version is announced, but AWS does not say what specifically changed in the underlying configuration. This can have unintended consequences and result in additional work in order to figure out what changes were made.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Portainer
    • When setting up static IPs for a new container, having the used ones for a specific network at hand would be cool or something like a mini IPAM of some sort...
    • Using the developertools to see "oh, it's a 40x or 500" when something doesn't seem to load because the ui just states "Didn't work" is kinda annoying. expandable toasts or something would be nice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Likelihood to Renew
    Amazon AWS
    As our technology grows, it makes more sense to individually provision each server rather than have it done via beanstalk. There are several reasons to do so, which I cannot explain without further diving into the architecture itself, but I can tell you this. With automation, you also loose the flexibility to morph the system for your specific needs. So if you expect that in future you need more customization to your deployment process, then there is a good chance that you might try to do things individually rather than use an automation like beanstalk.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Portainer
    It is an excellent tool.
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    The overall usability is good enough, as far as the scaling, interactive UI and logging system is concerned, could do a lot better when it comes to the efficiency, in case of complicated node logics and complicated node architectures. It can have better software compatibility and can try to support collaboration with more softwares
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Portainer
    Accessibility for Non-Experts: even with some people having a bit longer on-boarding it is still very simple Quick setup is insanely useful, we can get it running in 10 seconds after installing docker Portainer has once again super clean UI and is very user friendly. Deployment/monitoring and management are super easy. I can tell just from a glance if something is out of date (watching at you Watchtower not doing your job for some reason)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    As I described earlier it has been really cost effective and really easy for fellow developers who don't want to waste weeks and weeks into learning and manually deploying stuff which basically takes month to create and go live with the Minimal viable product (MVP). With AWS Beanstalk within a week a developer can go live with the Minimal viable product easily.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Portainer
    One of their staff members jumped on a video call immediately with me and led me through the problem and solution during a quick session of screen sharing. In this day and age that is above and beyond, especially when it comes to software. It took approximately 5-10 minutes to diagnose and fix, including pleasantries!
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Amazon AWS
    - Do as many experiments as you can before you commit on using beanstalk or other AWS features. - Keep future state in mind. Think through what comes next, and if that is technically possible to do so. - Always factor in cost in terms of scaling. - We learned a valuable lesson when we wanted to go multi-region, because then we realized many things needs to change in code. So if you plan on using this a lot, factor multiple regions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Portainer
    It is really easy. Just follow the documentation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    We also use Heroku and it is a great platform for smaller projects and light Node.js services, but we have found that in terms of cost, the Elastic Beanstalk option is more affordable for the projects that we undertake. The fact that it sits inside of the greater AWS Cloud offering also compels us to use it, since integration is simpler. We have also evaluated Microsoft Azure and gave up trying to get an extremely basic implementation up and running after a few days of struggling with its mediocre user interface and constant issues with documentation being outdated. The authentication model is also badly broken and trying to manage resources is a pain. One cannot compare Azure with anything that Amazon has created in the cloud space since Azure really isn't a mature platform and we are always left wanting when we have to interface with it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Portainer
    Portainer takes the cup in terms of usability and features. It is also more useful for smaller deployments, whereas Kubernetes in our opinion and experience, could probably be more suited to certain other use cases. Portainer is also a fresh feel among all the preexisting container management solutions and brings positivity and a new breeze in the industry.
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • till now we had not Calculated ROI as the project is still evolving and we had to keep on changing the environment implementation
    • it meets our purpose of quick deployment as compared to on-premises deployment
    • till now we look good as we also controlled our expenses which increased suddenly in the middle of deployment activity
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Portainer
    • Increased productivity: Portainer's user-friendly interface and streamlined container management can help increase the productivity of IT teams.
    • Cost savings: By simplifying container management, Portainer can help reduce the time and resources required to manage container environments, potentially leading to cost savings.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots

    Portainer Screenshots

    Screenshot of Portainer is a universal container management platform to help adopt and manage Docker, Kubernetes, Nomad and Edge environments.