AWS Secrets Manager vs. Google Vault

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS Secrets Manager
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
AWS Secrets Manager enables users to rotate, manage, and retrieve secrets throughout their lifecycle, making it easier to maintain a secure environment that meets security and compliance needs. With Secrets Manager, administrators pay based on the number of secrets stored and API calls made.
$0.05
Per 10,000 API Calls
Google Vault
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Google Vault is an ediscovery and archiving service for messaging and content created through some applications in G Suite. Users can retain, search, and export an organization’s data from select apps with Vault for G Suite Business and Enterprise editions.N/A
Pricing
AWS Secrets ManagerGoogle Vault
Editions & Modules
Per 10,000 API Calls
$0.05
Per 10,000 API Calls
Per Secret Per Month
$0.40
Per Secret Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS Secrets ManagerGoogle Vault
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
AWS Secrets ManagerGoogle Vault
Small Businesses
Keeper
Keeper
Score 8.8 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Keeper
Keeper
Score 8.8 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AWS Secrets ManagerGoogle Vault
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(2 ratings)
8.7
(16 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS Secrets ManagerGoogle Vault
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
[AWS Secrets Manager] is really good at managing the secrets for each environment (stage, production, ...), and with a simple command, the users will get all the variables for running the project. Depending on the user role, they could just read and/or edit the variables on the Secrets Manager on AWS. This facilitates the management of the secrets.
Read full review
Google
Well suited - 1. Quick archival esp in Google workspace apps. Very easy to archive and store important conversations, chats, etc. 2. Search and eDiscovery - Very important feature. Less appropriate - 1. Export - Very limited options and sometimes a cause of concern due to limited options post eDiscovery. 2. Integration - Very limited integration options and leads to the use of multiple alternatives or workspaces. 3. Archival post deletion - No option for this that leads to missing important elements sometimes.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Single source of truth for secrets
  • Securely share secrets with colleagues
  • Securely store secrets for services to access during runtime
Read full review
Google
  • Archiving - Archiving of emails, chats, etc, Pretty easy to use and have some amazing features wrt to duration, access, etc.
  • Search - Post archival, Google Vault makes it pretty easy to search for relevant content and eDiscovery.
  • Auditing - Workspace manager can easily audit user activities. Helps security at the org level.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • It could be good if a user can use a variable in the project but can't see them in the manager on AWS
Read full review
Google
  • More export options are available to the user, specifically allowing exported data to be imported into a new account easily
  • The interface is very basic and easy to use, but the dashboard could show more information to make it more usable
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
Both AWS Secrets Manager & MS Azure Key Vault are pretty similar. They're the default secrets manager on their respective cloud platform.
The choice comes down to where your infra resides on.
Read full review
Google
The product is similar offering but it is already well integrated into the other g-suite products that we use. It works really well in terms of searching and indexing documents. Other products seemed more elaborate and were complex to implement and use. Since our use case was rather simpler data backup and retrieval, hence it seemed a good fit to implement
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Costs are suitable
  • ROI is positive
Read full review
Google
  • Positive ROI- able to conveniently store and access files/data that otherwise would not have been as organized. Not only makes my day more efficient but leads to a better client experience.
  • Organized storage.
  • Easy interface once you get used it it- give it about a month.
Read full review
ScreenShots