Independently Invited by TrustRadius
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Azure Application Gateway | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft's Azure Application Gateway is a platform-managed, scalable, and highly available application delivery controller as a service with integrated web application firewall. | N/A |
![]() Azure Load Balancer | Score7.4 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft's Azure Load Balancer provides built-in load balancing for cloud services and virtual machines, so the user can create highly-available and scalable applications in minutes. | $0.01 Per Rule Per Hour |
Kemp LoadMaster | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | LoadMaster from Kemp Technologies in New York is an application delivery controller. | $1,720 per year |
| Azure Application Gateway | Azure Load Balancer | Kemp LoadMaster | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Azure Application Gateway | Azure Load Balancer | Kemp LoadMaster | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Considered Multiple Products | ![]() | ![]() No answer on this topic | |
| Key User Insights | |||
| Would buy again | |||
100% Would buy again 9 Answers | No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 61 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |||
100% Delivers good value for the price 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 60 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |||
100% Happy with the feature set 9 Answers | No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 61 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 52 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |||
100% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | No answers on this topic | 98% Implementation went as expected 58 Answers | |
| Azure Application Gateway | Azure Load Balancer | Kemp LoadMaster | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | NetScaler Score8 out of 10 | ![]() F5 BIG-IP Score9.2 out of 10 | ![]() F5 BIG-IP Score9.2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | NetScaler Score8 out of 10 | ![]() F5 BIG-IP Score9.2 out of 10 | ![]() F5 BIG-IP Score9.2 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Azure Application Gateway | Azure Load Balancer | Kemp LoadMaster | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | - | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | - | 8.6 |
| Usability | 9.0 | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | - | 8.2 |
| Implementation Rating | - | - | 9.1 |
| Configurability | - | - | 8.2 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | - | 9.1 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | - | 9.1 |
| Azure Application Gateway | Azure Load Balancer | Kemp LoadMaster | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() No answers on this topic | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() No answers on this topic | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | ![]()
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |