Azure Backup vs. Carbonite by OpenText

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Backup
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Backup is a cloud backup service.
$5
Carbonite by OpenText
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Carbonite by OpenText (also replacing the former EVault products acquired from Seagate in 2016) is a cloud backup solution for small business. Designed to recover anything from a single file to an entire system with the click of a button, Carbonite users can protect virtually any type of file.N/A
Pricing
Azure BackupCarbonite by OpenText
Editions & Modules
Storage in GB/Month
$0.0224 to $0.0569
per GB
Backup Instance <50GB
$5.00 + storage consumed
Backup Instance > 50 GB but < or = 500 GB
$10.00 + storage consumed
Backup Instance Instance is > 500 GB
$10 for each 500 GB increment + storage consumed
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure BackupCarbonite by OpenText
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure BackupCarbonite by OpenText
Considered Both Products
Azure Backup
Chose Azure Backup
Azure Backup is based on the most secure and encrypted cloud storage facility available...Microsoft. They have been doing this a long time and have ironed out all the kinks, leaving only the good and dependable solution in place. Azure Backup is fast also, you do not have major …
Carbonite by OpenText

No answer on this topic

Features
Azure BackupCarbonite by OpenText
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Backup
8.7
13 Ratings
4% above category average
Carbonite by OpenText
-
Ratings
Versioning8.511 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files9.16 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files8.26 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
File search8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Storage Security & Administration
Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Backup
9.0
13 Ratings
4% above category average
Carbonite by OpenText
-
Ratings
User and role management9.013 Ratings00 Ratings
File organization9.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Device management9.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Storage Platform
Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Product A and Product B
Azure Backup
8.0
13 Ratings
8% below category average
Carbonite by OpenText
-
Ratings
Performance8.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Reliability8.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Reports7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Azure Backup
-
Ratings
Carbonite by OpenText
8.9
24 Ratings
3% above category average
Universal recovery00 Ratings10.09 Ratings
Instant recovery00 Ratings3.811 Ratings
Recovery verification00 Ratings9.79 Ratings
Business application protection00 Ratings9.015 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations00 Ratings10.016 Ratings
Incremental backup identification00 Ratings9.721 Ratings
Backup to the cloud00 Ratings9.623 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression00 Ratings9.013 Ratings
Snapshots00 Ratings10.011 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings8.912 Ratings
Management dashboard00 Ratings8.912 Ratings
Platform support00 Ratings8.913 Ratings
Retention options00 Ratings6.714 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings9.814 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
Azure Backup
-
Ratings
Carbonite by OpenText
8.6
3 Ratings
1% above category average
Continuous data protection00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Replication00 Ratings8.62 Ratings
Operational reporting and analytics00 Ratings7.23 Ratings
Malware protection00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Multi-location capabilities00 Ratings8.32 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure BackupCarbonite by OpenText
Small Businesses
SugarSync
SugarSync
Score 4.3 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.5 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.5 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure BackupCarbonite by OpenText
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(13 ratings)
9.1
(49 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(8 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(3 ratings)
8.9
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
9.7
(4 ratings)
8.2
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure BackupCarbonite by OpenText
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure Backup is suitable for companies of various sizes, with varying amounts of data. The cost of the investment should be thought out carefully so that there are no bad surprises with unnecessary files going to Azure Backup. The interface is friendly and easy to configure and it does not require your company to have a backup expert. It is highly recommended for companies with smaller number of servers and better if the servers are already running in an Azure environment.
Read full review
OpenText
More than enough for small companies with several on-prem servers. In 2021, it wouldn't be wise to pit all important data to a single backup service. Carbonite Server is solid, but it's not 100% reliable so I'd definitely recommend having multiple backup services either on the cloud in conjunction with other backup services so the user has multiple safety nets in case of disaster and failed granular restorations.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Azure Backup is fast! Coupled with the fact that Microsoft created Azure and Windows - these two operate phenomenally together!
  • Administering the backups inside of Azure is a breeze. The ability to mount, restore entire backups, or recover files, has been made very easy. You do not have to download any media to recover something, you do this all in the cloud and it gets mounted in Microsoft's systems. Making this process less than a quarter of the time you would have spent with your 'other' backup solutions.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Simple administrative web interface - It's easy to provision users, look at data usage stats, disable users, and update policies to control what folders users are allowed to backup, and what options they can access
  • Easy client installation - Installing and updating clients was very simple. The client would notify the user when a new update was approved by the site admins, and they typically went very smoothly.
  • Good performance - Backups went fairly fast, and were generally invisible to the user, other than the icon updating on files to indicate whether the current version of a file was backed up or not.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • backup schedule calendar would be cool
  • Backup vaults should ask if you want to send notifications when you first set it up, there have been a couple of times when I noticed a month later that, backup job failures were not configured to send email notifications.
Read full review
OpenText
  • While overall file restoration is easy to do, obtaining earlier versions is not as user friendly as it could be. You need to enter a date and click search to bring up the latest versions as of the date entered. That’s fine, but what is missing is the ability to see all versions of an individual file. If I am looking for a past file version I want to be able to view the file history as a subset of that file (in other words I should be able to click a + sign and expand to see past versions of the file). Otherwise I am just guessing which dates the file was changed in the past. Sometimes that’s OK, but Mozy needs to build in this enhanced, but necessary feature.
  • A couple of years ago, for non enterprise users, Mozy made radical storage and pricing changes forcing myself and many users off their system, as the price for the same storage was going up significantly. So be careful when using Mozy as past experience has shown they are willing to make major changes regardless of the negative impact on their users.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
OpenText
Carbonite Server Backup does not integrate or support any reporting; it is not good at it. We required monthly and quarterly reports for audit. If we fail in that we get fined or we have to pay a certain amount of money to customer. It does not support cloud instances and we are using N2WS for the cloud instances. This is an additional burden for customers.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Azure backup is easy to implement, accessible by using the web portal GUI, and has the ability to restore at the file level or the complete VM. We have experienced zero issues with the backup process or performing file-level restorations. We have not restored an entire VM to date.
Read full review
OpenText
Out of all the vendor we deal with they are one of the best when it comes to customers service. Reliable,you can reach them by telephone easily, Great overall can not say anything to the contrary. Usibility is excellent. I recommend them highly whether you need a simple backup ofr more complex for servers etc.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
One of the differentials of the solution is the high level of guarantee and support of the Azure Backup solution. Microsoft is a reference in a technology company with a highly trained support team and helps us with any questions or technical problems with the tool. Service is fast and efficient with trained engineers.
Read full review
OpenText
I usually find what I need to know by looking in the Carbonite knowledge base online. We haven't had any major problems, usually we just need clarification on a point or more details about a feature so we look it up. We haven't had to call in for help in quite awhile.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
OpenText
We had appliance and we just needed to setup the Director Console which was straight forward and easy.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Azure Backup works on Azure, the most famous of the cloud systems that the whole world has switched to, which is now a very large part of the Microsoft ecosystem that we have been used to using for years. Therefore, it is less tiring to use the additional service of an infrastructure that we already use, even if it is a part of it, which can be easily integrated with existing systems, which is one of the most important issues we IT professionals pay attention to. For this reason, we wanted to swim in familiar waters instead of another brand.
Read full review
OpenText
Netbak is a great product but we also had a secondary issue of having to backup several PC's on site and at remote locations. Carbonite helped with both and gave us one central admin console to be able to check the progress of all our backups, where netbak would have required us to setup a tunnel or use the internet to move data back to our main office.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • It allowed us to have our VMs protected very quickly and with simple implementation.
  • It saved us from taking backups from Azure workloads from the on-prem environment, or even deploying a Backup environment on the cloud.
  • It has a low/'controlled' cost as you "pay-as-you-go."
Read full review
OpenText
  • We have a safety net that we didn't have before.
  • Key players are now backed up through an automated system that was easy to silently install.
  • The resources used impacted our exchange server negatively and slowed email until it was disabled.
Read full review
ScreenShots