Azure DevOps Services vs. GitKraken

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure DevOps Services
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Azure DevOps (formerly VSTS, Microsoft Visual Studio Team System) is an agile development product that is an extension of the Microsoft Visual Studio architecture. Azure DevOps includes software development, collaboration, and reporting capabilities.
$2
per GB (first 2GB free)
GitKraken
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
GitKraken's commit graph helps visualize branch structure and commit history. It helps verify recent Git actions on the repo, and also shows who made what code changes and when, so it’s easier to track down when a bug was introduced and revert back to a previous version. GitKraken Client is a Git GUI that detects and alerts users of potential conflicts so as to prevent them from happening. With itsuser Activity Status, the user can know who is online in the GitKraken Client.
$1,250
per installation
Pricing
Azure DevOps ServicesGitKraken
Editions & Modules
Azure Artifacts
$2
per GB (first 2GB free)
Basic Plan
$6
per user per month (first 5 users free)
Azure Pipelines - Self-Hosted
$15
per extra parallel job (1 free parallel job with unlimited minutes)
Azure Pipelines - Microsoft Hosted
$40
per parallel job (1,800 minutes free with 1 free parallel job)
Basic + Test Plan
$52
per user per month
Installed by You
$1250
per installed license
Hosted by GitKraken
Customized according to the amount of team members.
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure DevOps ServicesGitKraken
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure DevOps ServicesGitKraken
Considered Both Products
Azure DevOps Services
Chose Azure DevOps Services
Axosoft is a little easier to use but VSTS has provided more customization and usability across the business unit has increased.
GitKraken

No answer on this topic

Features
Azure DevOps ServicesGitKraken
Version Control Software Features
Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Product A and Product B
Azure DevOps Services
-
Ratings
GitKraken
9.9
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Branching and Merging00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Version History00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Version Control Collaboration Tools00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Pull Requests00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Code Review Tools00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Project Access Control00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Automated Testing Integration00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Issue Tracking Integration00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Branch Protection00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure DevOps ServicesGitKraken
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 6.8 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 6.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure DevOps ServicesGitKraken
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(70 ratings)
9.8
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.6
(9 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(11 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure DevOps ServicesGitKraken
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
DevOps is much more user friendly than Git itself. There is a more GUI-centric interface, tighter integration with the Azure / Entra architecture. For those of use in the Microsoft-sphere, it really is excellent for code-centric project management. I rate this as an 8 because it does not seem quite as well suited for fully functional / non-code project aspects in implementation. Nor does it have customer / end-user portal / front end for easy reporting and insight.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
The software is easy to use and share within our team. Licensing and setup is straightforward. The product just works and we love it.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Flexible Requirements Hierarchy Management: AZDO makes it easy to track items such as features or epics as a flat list, or as a hierarchy in which you can track the parent-child relationship.
  • Fast Data Entry: AZDO was designed to facilitate quick data entry to capture work items quickly, while still enabling detailed capture of acceptance criteria and item properties.
  • Excel Integration: AZDO stands out for its integration with MS Excel, which enables quick updates for bulk items.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Customizable workflow steps help organize projects
  • Time tracking down to seconds helps to estimate sprints
  • Burndown charts let you know when to plan your next release
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • I did mention it has good visibility in terms of linking, but sometimes items do get lost, so if there was a better way to manage that, that would be great.
  • The wiki is not the prettiest thing to look at, so it could have refinements there.
  • It could improve the search slightly better.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Timing Out - when editing a story or bug, occasionally Axosoft will time out and all changes will be lost
  • Viewing past sprints can be hard to locate
  • Multiple users within a Story - Axosoft could do a better job managing multiple users on the same story
  • User Interface isn't entirely user friendly and looks a bit outdated
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
I don't think our organization will stray from using VSTS/TFS as we are now looking to upgrade to the 2012 version. Since our business is software development and we want to meet the requirements of CMMI to deliver consistent and high quality software, this SDLC management tool is here to stay. In addition, our company uses a lot of Microsoft products, such as Office 365, Asp.net, etc, and since VSTS/TFS has proved itself invaluable to our own processes and is within the Microsoft family of products, we will continue to use VSTS/TFS for a long, long time.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
Azure DevOps is a powerful, complex cloud application. As such there are a number of things it does great and something where there is room for improvement. One of those areas would be in usability. In my opinion it relies too much on search. There is no easy way to view all projects or to group them in a logical way. You need to search for everything.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
Over the years, I have used many Git tools, but GitKraken stands out. It's now my favorite Git tool by far—excellent graphical overview of the branches, straightforward usage of all functionality, and lots of integration available. Currently, I am using GitKraken to connect to the ADO and quickly create PRs, using gitflow and tracking the work of my team mates.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
When we've had issues, both Microsoft support and the user community have been very responsive. DevOps has an active developer community and frankly, you can find most of your questions already asked and answered there. Microsoft also does a better job than most software vendors I've worked with creating detailed and frequently updated documentation.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Was not part of the process.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Microsoft Planner is used by project managers and IT service managers across our organization for task tracking and running their team meetings. Azure DevOps works better than Planner for software development teams but might possibly be too complex for non-software teams or more business-focused projects. We also use ServiceNow for IT service management and this tool provides better analysis and tracking of IT incidents, as Azure DevOps is more suited to development and project work for dev teams.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
I actually like JIRA better, to me the UI is a lot cleaner. Easier to use, and search tickets.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • We have saved a ton of time not calculating metrics by hand.
  • We no longer spend time writing out cards during planning, it goes straight to the board.
  • We no longer track separate documents to track overall department goals. We were able to create customized icons at the department level that lets us track each team's progress against our dept goals.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Productivity bump for developers over previous software
  • Code is never gone forever and can be found if needed
  • Allows us to collaborate and finish projects faster
Read full review
ScreenShots